As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best 4K Blu-ray Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.13
1 day ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
House Party 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
14 hrs ago
The Terminator 4K (Blu-ray)
$21.41
2 hrs ago
Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)
$30.52
 
Jurassic World Rebirth 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
The Breakfast Club 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
 
Starship Troopers 4K (Blu-ray)
$26.95
 
The Alfred Hitchcock Classics Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$32.49
 
Superman 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > 4K Ultra HD > 4K Blu-ray and 4K Movies
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-06-2022, 01:15 PM   #2001
alexdg1 alexdg1 is offline
Senior Member
 
alexdg1's Avatar
 
Jan 2015
Miami, Florida
127
560
234
Paramount

Quote:
Originally Posted by OneBuckFilms View Post
Looking at this, I think Paramount (for films other than the DE) are simply porting over what they release in the 50th Anniversary set, but remastering the movies from the 4K sources, and releasing the 4K disks as well.

I think the inconsistencies come partly from the way they are defining the scope of the projects.

The Trek II expansion, and the inclusion of Part 2 of the Roger Lay documentary, was rather obviously meant to whet the appetite for the 50th Anniversary set, and was an outlier of sorts as well as test the waters for whether fans will buy the remastered disks.

The 4 movie set on 4K was also likely a test the waters for the other two films (and TNG films down the line).

The TMP DE release should be seen, IMHO, as a separate entity in it's own right, and it seems they are doing that correctly in-and-of itself.

It's inclusion in the 6 movie set (could be seen almost as a 7 movie set) is really a meeting of two separate release projects (The theatrical films in 4K+revised Blu-rays, The TMPE release)

Somewhat convoluted history behind all this. We could almost write a novel detailing these movie's release on Blu-ray and 4K
.
Indeed.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2022, 01:16 PM   #2002
alexdg1 alexdg1 is offline
Senior Member
 
alexdg1's Avatar
 
Jan 2015
Miami, Florida
127
560
234
USA

Quote:
Originally Posted by stvn1974 View Post
Around 2008 my media collection was stolen. Over 800 CDs and a couple of hundred DVDs. What was really infuriating was going to the used store in town and seeing my stuff for sale. The police said there was nothing they could do. I did get a nice insurance settlement. Always catalogue your collections people.
Ugh. That bites.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2022, 03:43 PM   #2003
KMFDMvsEnya KMFDMvsEnya is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
KMFDMvsEnya's Avatar
 
Jun 2014
UT
Default

It would have been awesome if Paramount had gone back and repurposed the DE scans and work to reconstruct the TC with superior picture quality.

Simply absurd that the 2009 transfer actually looks better in numerous cases than the rubbish job done with 2021 transfer. Really half-assed.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Bolty (08-06-2022), JohnCarpenterLives (08-06-2022), Lope de Aguirre (08-06-2022), mar3o (08-07-2022), Mose Harper (08-07-2022), TheDarkBlueNight (08-07-2022)
Old 08-06-2022, 03:56 PM   #2004
Bolty Bolty is online now
Blu-ray Knight
 
Bolty's Avatar
 
Jan 2009
Boynton Beach, Fl
76
100
93
82
Default

Yeah, it's crazy that the TC is now locked in with that awful "fix" in the space dock.
Maybe there is a slight chance that when the DE team was "finishing" the Kirk spacewalk shot they pointed out that the mounting arm fix was a screw up and to use their version from the DE.

Remember that the 2021 TC release came out long before they had completed their project. I wonder whose idea it was to finish the Kirk space walk scene. If it was the DE team then maybe they also made some suggestions for the re-release of the TC/SLV combo.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
JohnCarpenterLives (08-06-2022), Lionel Horsepackage (08-09-2022), Lope de Aguirre (08-06-2022)
Old 08-06-2022, 05:55 PM   #2005
stvn1974 stvn1974 is offline
Blu-ray Prince
 
stvn1974's Avatar
 
Jan 2012
Earth
18
Default

I have the first four films on the remastered BDs that were released when the first 4K set came out. I decided to go ahead and order the Complete Six Film set of 4K/BDs and the Director's Cut box. Now I just need to find out what new 4K player I want to get since the Sony X700 that I have now is garbage.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
CairnsyMan (08-06-2022)
Old 08-06-2022, 06:37 PM   #2006
david_blu david_blu is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
Jul 2011
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bolty View Post
Yeah, it's crazy that the TC is now locked in with that awful "fix" in the space dock.
Maybe there is a slight chance that when the DE team was "finishing" the Kirk spacewalk shot they pointed out that the mounting arm fix was a screw up and to use their version from the DE.

Remember that the 2021 TC release came out long before they had completed their project. I wonder whose idea it was to finish the Kirk space walk scene. If it was the DE team then maybe they also made some suggestions for the re-release of the TC/SLV combo.
I swear to god if the TC/SLV disc corrects these issues on the TC now that I have cancelled the Deluxe set I will do my own impression of Khaaaaaaaaannnn!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2022, 06:53 PM   #2007
Jar Jar Stinks Jar Jar Stinks is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
Jar Jar Stinks's Avatar
 
Aug 2011
-
-
-
-
246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KMFDMvsEnya View Post
Simply absurd that the 2009 transfer actually looks better in numerous cases than the rubbish job done with 2021 transfer. Really half-assed.
I haven't heard that before. Is that really true?

Quote:
Originally Posted by KMFDMvsEnya View Post
It would have been awesome if Paramount had gone back and repurposed the DE scans and work to reconstruct the TC with superior picture quality.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bolty View Post
Remember that the 2021 TC release came out long before they had completed their project. I wonder whose idea it was to finish the Kirk space walk scene. If it was the DE team then maybe they also made some suggestions for the re-release of the TC/SLV combo.
Quote:
Originally Posted by david_blu View Post
I swear to god if the TC/SLV disc corrects these issues on the TC now that I have cancelled the Deluxe set I will do my own impression of Khaaaaaaaaannnn!
There's a topic on this in the ST:TMP Appreciation Group.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2022, 07:53 PM   #2008
david_blu david_blu is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
Jul 2011
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bolty View Post
You cancelled the deluxe because if those issues?
Honestly it's possible but do we really think they're going to mess around with what they've already approved and released last year? I just don't think they care enough.
Nooo, no no, I cancelled because I realised I don't need the SLV and all the other stuff in the set. But if that disc proves to be an improvement then that would be annoying.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
OneBuckFilms (08-06-2022)
Old 08-06-2022, 08:00 PM   #2009
KMFDMvsEnya KMFDMvsEnya is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
KMFDMvsEnya's Avatar
 
Jun 2014
UT
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jar Jar Stinks View Post
There's a topic on this in the ST:TMP Appreciation Group.
I do not use nor have a profile with Facebook or Metafook, so alas I cannot see any discussion of that matter.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Mose Harper (08-07-2022)
Old 08-06-2022, 09:07 PM   #2010
starmike starmike is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
starmike's Avatar
 
Feb 2012
NJ
Default

Watching people complain about this set for silly reasons is probably the most fun I've had in a long while on a forum.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2022, 11:49 PM   #2011
OneBuckFilms OneBuckFilms is offline
Senior Member
 
Dec 2012
47
228
29
49
12
7
1
15
Default

I’m merely speculating.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2022, 12:27 AM   #2012
BNex99 BNex99 is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
Sep 2014
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KMFDMvsEnya View Post
Simply absurd that the 2009 transfer actually looks better in numerous cases than the rubbish job done with 2021 transfer. Really half-assed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jar Jar Stinks View Post
I haven't heard that before. Is that really true?
No, it's not. Some of the VFX shots in the 2021 remaster have some excessive noise reduction, and their counterparts in the 2009 BD do look a little better. And Vulcan is too red.

Otherwise, the 2021 remaster is vastly superior to the older Blu-ray, in terms of detail, color, and everything else.

Also, I still don't believe that one shot of the Enterprise leaving spacedock is a recent digital fix. As others have suggested, I think it's much more likely, considering the post-production process on this particular movie, that different passes of the shot made it into different elements (negative, interpositive). That might also explain the two different takes of Spock in the Vulcan scene.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Bolty (08-07-2022)
Old 08-07-2022, 01:24 AM   #2013
Geoff D Geoff D is online now
Blu-ray Emperor
 
Geoff D's Avatar
 
Feb 2009
Swanage, Engerland
1346
2523
6
33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BNex99 View Post
No, it's not. Some of the VFX shots in the 2021 remaster have some excessive noise reduction, and their counterparts in the 2009 BD do look a little better. And Vulcan is too red.

Otherwise, the 2021 remaster is vastly superior to the older Blu-ray, in terms of detail, color, and everything else.

Also, I still don't believe that one shot of the Enterprise leaving spacedock is a recent digital fix. As others have suggested, I think it's much more likely, considering the post-production process on this particular movie, that different passes of the shot made it into different elements (negative, interpositive). That might also explain the two different takes of Spock in the Vulcan scene.
Nah. The frozen stars that've been lazily copied in to cover the path of the moving bracket scream 'digital fix' to me. And double nah, you don't have different shots cut into an interpositive because that's contact printed directly from the conformed negative. People have speculated that different versions of that shot exist, fine, but you won't have different shots cut into different pre-print elements as the conformed original negative is the primary source for all downstream elements.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
thebarnman (12-10-2022)
Old 08-07-2022, 01:52 AM   #2014
BNex99 BNex99 is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
Sep 2014
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff D View Post
Nah. The frozen stars that've been lazily copied in to cover the path of the moving bracket scream 'digital fix' to me. And double nah, you don't have different shots cut into an interpositive because that's contact printed directly from the conformed negative. People have speculated that different versions of that shot exist, fine, but you won't have different shots cut into different pre-print elements as the conformed original negative is the primary source for all downstream elements.
You might be right, but I just know they were rushing to finish this thing in 1979. The frozen stars are weird, but the fuzziness of the ship and the side of the deflector dish flickering says optical printing to me. If that's a 2021 digital comp, then it is indeed an astonishingly sloppy one.

Also, somehow two separate takes of the Vulcan High Master mind-melding with Spock did make it into different versions, so I still don't know. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Last edited by BNex99; 08-07-2022 at 02:35 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
CairnsyMan (08-08-2022)
Old 08-07-2022, 02:21 AM   #2015
User897 User897 is offline
Expert Member
 
User897's Avatar
 
Mar 2011
1
6
Default

In other words, this film is still bordering on cluster**** status, although not as bad as what has come before. Maybe they'll get it right for the 2029 super-deluxe-this-is-it edition.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2022, 03:20 AM   #2016
OneBuckFilms OneBuckFilms is offline
Senior Member
 
Dec 2012
47
228
29
49
12
7
1
15
Default

From what I've seen, I think the 2021 release is a significant overall improvement from 2009 on Blu-ray, but none of these have been perfect.

I strongly suspect that the DE is where the real improvements are likely to be found, especially with the recomposited effects in may places.

I'll have to look more closely to see about effects in the 2021 release that are of poorer quality to those of 2009, aside from the obviously fixed spacedock scene.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2022, 05:46 AM   #2017
SpacemanDoug SpacemanDoug is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
SpacemanDoug's Avatar
 
Mar 2018
Washington State
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OneBuckFilms View Post
From what I've seen, I think the 2021 release is a significant overall improvement from 2009 on Blu-ray, but none of these have been perfect.

I strongly suspect that the DE is where the real improvements are likely to be found, especially with the recomposited effects in may places.

I'll have to look more closely to see about effects in the 2021 release that are of poorer quality to those of 2009, aside from the obviously fixed spacedock scene.
really the only scene besides that spacedock fix that noticeably degraded was the bolt of light sequence, that portion looked noticeably more dupey than the rest of the non-effects shots of that scene

there was also the scene whenever Spock is retrieved by Kirk after Spock attempts to enter the main "brain" of V-Ger, there is a bit of Paramount DigiSmear™ that lurks there but still isn't so noticeable as it's at least very brief and nowhere near as bad as it looked on the 2009 transfer

Last edited by SpacemanDoug; 08-07-2022 at 06:19 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Trekkie313 (02-23-2025)
Old 08-07-2022, 07:42 AM   #2018
mar3o mar3o is offline
Banned
 
Dec 2011
1
2
Default

After seeing those caps, I think I've made my decision to cancel my pre-order for the deluxe box set. The DNR/processing on the previous/upcoming theatrical cut effect shots is so bad, and the Special Longer Cut will be using all of that same exact footage via branching. So all that money on the deluxe set just to see all the effect shots smeared into a blurry mess seems pointless when the director's cut will look so much better. The old blu-ray almost seems to have more detail in many of those shots than the UHD theatrical does. That's a disgrace. To think the only way to see the theatrical on UHD is to see those effects shots in that condition is a shame.

I just can't see myself wanting to watch the theatrical (and by extension, the SLV) ever on UHD knowing how smeared the effects footage is, knowing how much better the Director's Cut looks. Which is a shame, because I'm big on nostalgia, and would have appreciated owning the SLV. If the SLV branched the Director's cut for the effects footage, I'd be all over it. But using the vastly inferior theatrical version for the branching ensures out of the 3 cuts, the Director's cut is the only cut I'll want to watch, despite my fondness for the theatrical/SLV cuts.

I realize the theatrical cut live action footage is a huge improvement over previous editions, but the same can be said for the Director's Cut too now, and considering how many visual effect shots are in this film, I can't get past how bad they look in the theatrical - again, due to the DNR/processing. This film was nominated for an Oscar for visual effects. It's a major part of this film. It's not just a few shots. If I thought there was a chance the upcoming theatrical cut/SLV would be using the Director's Cut scans of the effects shots, I'd keep my order in. But I highly doubt they will do that.

Last edited by mar3o; 08-07-2022 at 07:56 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
TheDarkBlueNight (08-07-2022)
Old 08-07-2022, 07:51 AM   #2019
JohnCarpenterLives JohnCarpenterLives is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
JohnCarpenterLives's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
232
993
419
5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mar3o View Post
[Show spoiler]After seeing those caps, I think I've made my decision to cancel my pre-order for the deluxe box set. It's appalling how bad the DNR/processing is on the previous/upcoming theatrical cut effect shots, and the Special Longer Cut will be using all of that same exact footage via branching. So all that money on the deluxe set just to see all the effect shots smeared into a blurry mess seems pointless when the director's cut will look so much better. The old blu-ray almost seems to have more detail in many of those shots than the UHD theatrical does. That's a disgrace. To think the only way to see the theatrical on UHD is to see those effects shots in that condition is a shame.

I just can't see myself wanting to watch the theatrical (and by extension, the SLV) ever on UHD knowing what they did with the effects footage, knowing how much better the Director's Cut looks. Which is a shame, because I'm big on nostalgia, and would have appreciated owning the SLV. If the SLV branched the Director's cut for the effects footage, I'd be all over it. But using the vastly inferior theatrical version for the branching ensures out of the 3 cuts, the Director's cut is the only cut I'll want to watch, despite my fondness for the theatrical/SLV cuts.

I realize the theatrical cut live action footage is a huge improvement over previous editions, but the same can be said for the Director's Cut too now, and considering how many visual effect shots are in this film, I can't get past how bad they look in the theatrical - again, due to the DNR/processing. This film was nominated for an Oscar for visual effects. It's a major part of this film. It's not just a few shots. If I thought there was a chance the upcoming theatrical cut/SLV would be using the Director's Cut scans of the effects shots, I'd keep my order in. But I highly doubt they will do that.
Hoping against all logic that they remove the DNR for the TC/SLV.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Lope de Aguirre (08-07-2022), mar3o (08-07-2022)
Old 08-07-2022, 11:39 AM   #2020
Geoff D Geoff D is online now
Blu-ray Emperor
 
Geoff D's Avatar
 
Feb 2009
Swanage, Engerland
1346
2523
6
33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BNex99 View Post
You might be right, but I just know they were rushing to finish this thing in 1979. The frozen stars are weird, but the fuzziness of the ship and the side of the deflector dish flickering says optical printing to me. If that's a 2021 digital comp, then it is indeed an astonishingly sloppy one.

Also, somehow two separate takes of the Vulcan High Master mind-melding with Spock did make it into different versions, so I still don't know. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
As the sainted people behind the DE restoration still managed to put some astonishingly sloppy work in that version (captains lounge, the shuttle that stops moving before the shot ends) then I’m not surprised that whatever day players who did the theatrical tweaking ended up doing that spacedock shot so badly.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
hatter76 (08-07-2022), mar3o (08-07-2022), TheDarkBlueNight (08-07-2022)
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > 4K Ultra HD > 4K Blu-ray and 4K Movies

Tags
star trek, startrek


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:23 AM.