|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $44.99 | ![]() $27.13 16 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $27.57 16 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.96 45 min ago
| ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $30.50 23 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $70.00 |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Banned
![]() Oct 2011
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Last edited by Scottie; 02-26-2017 at 01:53 PM. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | a clockwork orange (06-10-2015), Abby is Q (06-11-2015), bailey1987 (06-18-2015), Big_Paulie (06-21-2015), Brett C (06-11-2015), Member-222782 (06-10-2015), Count Orlok (06-17-2015), Ill_Be_Back (06-10-2015), jkington (06-14-2015), jlk5844 (06-11-2015), jmb1381 (06-11-2015), JRBTempe (06-11-2015), MTRodaba2468 (06-11-2015), omenboy (06-10-2015), Pinot Grigio (06-10-2015), redrunner97 (06-10-2015), returnofthemack (06-10-2015), RiFiFi1955 (06-11-2015), Ruemorgue10 (06-10-2015), saginawjuggalo (06-11-2015), tylerdurden10 (06-11-2015) |
![]() |
#4 |
Active Member
May 2015
|
![]()
So stoked!
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Power Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: |
![]() |
#10 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
Why not include all cuts for the completists, and for comparison's sake?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
Just in time for fall break.
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | dohrmannmf (06-11-2015), redrunner97 (06-11-2015) |
![]() |
#14 |
Special Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | saginawjuggalo (06-15-2015) |
![]() |
#15 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
It doesn't really compromise anything. The movie is barely 90 minutes long - a 50gb disc can easily hold two cuts at a decent bitrate with extras.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
Then again, Shout put 2 cuts of LIFEFORCE on a BD50 and that had issues. I personally wouldn't watch a cut version unless it has some alternate footage. A seemless branching version as others have mentioned would be the best alternative. |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|