|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $68.47 20 hrs ago
| ![]() $49.99 | ![]() $26.59 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $36.69 | ![]() $31.99 | ![]() $34.96 | ![]() $29.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $96.99 | ![]() $54.45 21 hrs ago
| ![]() $86.13 | ![]() $80.68 |
![]() |
#3623 |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]()
"Deu Suay Doo" (aka "Raging Phoenix")
Ahh, leave it to Thailand to keep on producing kick-a** martial arts movies! I'm not exactly feeling 100% attentive today, especially since I had to prepare something for tomorrow, but I think I got the gist of this Thai film. Stylistically, it resembles "District B-13;" lots of funky dirty graffitti-ridden sets and lots of mean-looking tattoo-wearing thugs. The fight scenes are frequent and slick, and do not dissapoint. The main feature of this film is that the fights are a blend between standard martial arts (I'm not savvy with martial arts terms, but I'm guessing this is Muay Thai) and modern street dancing; the effect is similar to Mugen's fight style from "Samurai Champloo." All that being said, I really didn't find the story or characters terribly gripping on this initial viewing (like I said though, my attention span this time around is limited). It seems a bit long. On the plus side though, it is pretty well-made and stylish (some parts seem to have iffy artistic effects though; like the opening scenes looked all stretched out). I'll keep it for now anyway; I like it better than "Dynamite Warrior" and "Tiger Blade," but not nearly as much as "Ong Bak" or "Chocolate." 3.5/5 (entertainment: 3.5/5, story: 3/5, film: 3.5/5) This UK Blu-Ray is region-free (save for the extras), and it looks decent. Color is a little dull and bland, with a distinctive grayish look, but I think it's intentional (key flashback scenes are much more colorful, if not oversaturated). It is still very sharp, clean, and detailed. Sound quality seems good (subtitles only, no English dub). PQ: 4.5/5, AQ: 4/5 |
![]() |
![]() |
#3624 |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]()
DANCES WITH WOLVES 236 Minute DIRECTOR'S CUT
I'm in HD PQ and AQ nirvana right now having just finished watching what I consider to be the high-water mark of Kevin Costner's career, his romanticized tale of life and love among the plains Indian, specifically, the Lakota Sioux. This Director's cut has a run time of 236 minutes. The only other movie I can think of which is similar and is just as epic as this one is another one of my favorites, John Ford's longest work at 158 minutes, Cheyenne Autumn. In 2007, this film was selected for preservation in the U.S. National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant." "A personal project for star Kevin Costner, "Dances with Wolves" disproved a reputation Western films had acquired in the latter years of the 20th Century for being money-losers. The film also became the second Western to win the Academy Award for Best Film. The movie presents a fairly simple, intimate story (the quest of a cavalry soldier to get to know a nearby Sioux tribe and his resulting spiritual transformation) in an epic fashion, with sweeping cinematography and a majestic John Barry score. The film marks one of the more sympathetic portraits of Native-American life ever shown in American cinema, and introduced the American public to Lakota Sioux folklore, traditions and language." Surprisingly, I haven't seen Goodfellas yet but this did mark the second time that Martin Scorsese lost the Academy Award for Best Director to an actor making his directorial debut (the other was ten years earlier with Robert Redford on Ordinary People). PQ is simply amazing and this beats all of the previous versions I've owned and earns a 4.5/5 from me AQ is even better. Hoping the audio would sound as good as my soundtrack on SACD, I was not disappointed. Not as robust as the SACD, this is still the best I've heard this film on any video medium and so it earns a 5/5 from me. Sadly, this BD is Region B so most of you won't be able to enjoy this film like I just did. There are 2 audio commentaries in English, one with Director Kevin Costner and Producer Jim Wilson and the other one with Cinematographer Dean Semler and Film Editor Neil Travis. The BD also has the theatrical trailer in 1080p. MOVIE: 4.5/5 PQ: 4.5/5 AQ: 5/5 SUPPLEMENTS: 3/5 |
![]() |
![]() |
#3625 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
You imported the German version, I see? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3626 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
The Lovely Bones (HD on demand)
Obviously, PQ and AQ will not be rated because it wasn't a blu, but the sound shook my house and had some of the best panning effects I've heard and the PQ was incredible (the reviewer on this site said the PQ is as good as it gets). Film: 3 1/2 stars (out of 4) I know I'm going to get a lot of slack for my rating, but I rate films how I see it. Yes, this film has a 33% on Rottentomatoes and yes, Ebert gave it 1 1/2 stars. This marks the single greatest deviation I've ever had from Ebert when rating a film. There have been less than 5 times ever in which my rating has differed more than a full star, and this is one. My review will focus on negating Ebert's take. Although I love Ebert, his review is incredibly off-base. Despite admitting that the film has exceptional acting (which it does) and good technical qualities, he gives the film 1 1/2 stars and solely blames Peter Jackson. His review should not be given much credence for this fact alone. His rating is solely due to his misconception of the point of the film, which he believes to be an almost glamorization of the afterlife for a girl who was brutally raped (happened in the book but not even really implied here) and murdered (never even shown). Because he considers this to be "deplorable" he gave the film a very poor rating. I rarely see Ebert do this, but sometimes he does rate films based solely on emotion and not on what it deserves and this is such an instance, which is a shame because he didn't understand the film at all, which I find baffling (that being said, neither did many of the critics who had a similar view--I'm not sure how they missed the point so blatantly) (single worst run on sentence ever--the former English major in me is embarassed). It is an unfortunate reality that children are raped and murdered but it happens everyday. I haven't read the book, although it's on my shelf to be read when I'm done with my current book, but there's a reason why it was such a phenomenon--it attempted show the pain of such an unspeakable event for both the victim and the family being eased. It's meant to show that although a child can undergo such a horrific event, his or her death can bring people together and can alter lives in a way that may not be possible in life. The other point is that although it may seem unfair that a child should have to undergo such an event (correction: it is unfair, obviously), he or she can still experience a world of unearthly and eternal bliss. So, in essence, the point of the film is that although something unfair and terrible may happen during life, one's eternal life can still be blissful. For the devastated relatives, sadness and depression will still occur (I like that this can't be altered--more realistic), but just the belief that the deceased is still with you is enough to pull them through. I find it odd that Ebert hated the film for its wrongly interpreted message, as did many other critics, but films that encourage anarchy like Fight Club or the attempt at eliciting sympathy for an admitted Nazi mass murderer like The Reader (a best picture nominee) can escape unscathed. Yet this film is not allowed a pass, despite being less offensive even if it was interpreted like Ebert thought. In a way, the film is actually quite beautiful. [Show spoiler] I agree that there are scenes which seem to trivialize the murder, such as the odd scene involving Susan Sarandon and her antics at the home (which was an entirely pointless group of scenes) and the cartoonish montage of sledding in Heaven (I found the rest of the Heaven scenes to be very fitting and often very touching. They are also incredibly well filmed). However, these scenes can be forgiven when the rest of the film is so good. Walhberg and Weisz are great as grieving parents. Weisz has a great ability to convey bottled up emotions, as she showed in The Fountain and The Constant Gardener (Oscar win). Wahlberg was great in his role. Saoirse is truly an actress worth watching, as she showed in Atonement. Stanley Tucci, in an Oscar nominated role, is terrifying and extremely creepy. I found the directing to be incredible. I wondered how Jackson would handle a more intimate film after his previous four epics (I haven't seen his earlier work), and I think he did a great job. The special effects range from beautiful (Heaven) to disturbing (bathtub), but every scene is meticulously created and filmed. I will get a lot of heat for saying this, but this should have been one of the 10 best picture nominees. It's better than Avatar (which I liked a lot, for what it was), District 9 (which I did not like at all), and An Education (which was good but not great). So, of the films I've seen (still have a few more worthy candidates, like The Last Station, Coraline, The Road, and A Single Man, as well as the foreign films which I'm sure would have at least 2-3 nominees), these are my list of films that should have been nominated (not in order): 1) Up 2) Up in the Air 3) The Lovely Bones 4) The Cove 5) Sin Nombre 6) The Stoning of Soraya M. 7) The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo (does it qualify because it was released abroad last year, or does it not qualify because it was released domestically this year?) 8) Harry Potter and the Halfblood Prince 9) The Hurt Locker 10) The Blind Side Top 5: 1) The Cove 2) The Hurt Locker 3) Sin Nombre 4) The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo 5) The Stoning of Soraya M. Last edited by jhiggy23; 06-21-2010 at 10:41 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3628 | |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3630 | |
Blu-ray Duke
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3631 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
Ahh I need to stop being so dramatic about importing titles, especially those with non-English covers! I'd love to have this film in its extended version.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3632 |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]()
I really laughed when I read this because you must know I'm not a big fan of Avatar! The story just hasn't caught my attention and that's sad because I usually love everything starring Sigourney Weaver but not this time.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3634 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() No but seriously, I havent seen the film, but it sounds very interesting from your review. Your reaction to his review was my reaction to his Clockwork review. I felt he had the same knee-jerk reaction to the emotion of the film, rather than its merits. Of course, I know that film is very polarizing and reasonable minds (you and me) can disagree. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3636 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3637 | |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3638 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
![]() but...touche! Ok I'm sorry! you got me back! putting Fight Club in the same post as Clockwork?? ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3639 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3640 | |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
What movie have you watched the most ??? | Movies | BLUE MYSTIC RAIN | 822 | 02-04-2023 01:21 PM |
The Most Boring Movie You Ever Watched | Movies | Blu Man | 3990 | 10-11-2022 10:18 AM |
What Blu-ray Are You Watching Or Just Watched? Give a Mini Review | Blu-ray Movies - North America | slick1ru2 | 30 | 01-24-2010 07:09 PM |
Official Rate The Last Movie You've Seen Thread | Movies | _Bolt_ | 10 | 11-29-2008 03:28 AM |
User Review Rate Down Trolls | Feedback Forum | Grant Matrix | 1 | 10-30-2008 04:34 PM |
|
|