|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $24.96 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $27.13 22 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $27.57 22 hrs ago
| ![]() $30.48 1 day ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $29.96 | ![]() $34.99 |
![]() |
#3901 | |||
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
|||
![]() |
Thanks given by: |
![]() |
#3902 | |
Member
Nov 2021
Los Angeles, CA
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3903 |
Blu-ray Samurai
Jun 2014
UT
|
![]()
Also during the shot with Rose at the dining table, at frame right of her hair the grain exhibits artifacts from the processing.
Visible at normal speed, and more apparent when trying to find the matching frame for comparison to the 35mm scan. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3904 |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]()
The grain as you see on your monitor from a color-corrected still would never be the same on Blu-Ray or UHD. That's the nature of the beast when it comes to home video, it can look pretty darn close but never that razor sharp. Streaming which has exploded since the time of that scan complicates matters further cause even more compression and optimization is needed now.
Yes less "natural" grain is usually a negative, but when shown theatrically on film it never had that level of detail either. The hair looks worse on the scan to me. Last edited by Trekkie313; 12-08-2023 at 12:24 AM. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Steedeel (12-08-2023) |
![]() |
#3906 |
Active Member
Sep 2016
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Comrade_beandip (12-08-2023), Riddhi2011 (12-08-2023) |
![]() |
#3907 |
Active Member
|
![]()
I won’t have the disc in hand until next week so reserving my judgement until then.
We should, however, acknowledge that these boards absolutely nailed what has been done to this remaster of Titanic long before the official rundown came from Lightstorm via Bill Hunt. That is impressive, and just underlines the fact that the collective boards in here will know more or less exactly what has been done to other previous remasters/restorations as well even if wenever get an actual official breakdown like in the case of Titanic. Hats off to everyone … |
![]() |
![]() |
#3908 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
Welp here we go again another 4K thread ruined by so called experts who just have to find any little thing to nitpick and then the sheep follow. Sigh this forum is ridiculous sometimes I swear!
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: |
![]() |
#3910 |
Special Member
|
![]()
So we just blindly accept and totally ignore obvious issues with the disc, just to please you?
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Aragorn the Elfstone (12-08-2023), daycity (12-08-2023), mar3o (12-08-2023), Riddhi2011 (12-08-2023) |
![]() |
#3911 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | crowe-t (12-08-2023), thejoeman2 (12-08-2023) |
![]() |
#3912 |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]()
i'm just fast forward little bit that yellow sure is bright
![]() i did used 70.13 gift card balance this and indiana jones dial of destiny 4k and fact that target didn't have neither of them in stock so couldn't like order 1 and used my target gift didn't want to pay full price still cranky that as soon title came out early tues morning sorry price jump from 30.99 pre order to 40.99 if it would stay on that when was saying pre order all day long mon wouldn't had to pay visa card gotten these free today but i did end up paying 9.93 visa card due to price magically change i did complain a little bit about this to amazon since went back 30.99 yesterday gave me 20 back on gift card they said was site price issue and should had stay on 30.99 when it was release early 2 am in morning tues not change to 40.99 at all ![]() Last edited by y2jman; 12-08-2023 at 01:31 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3915 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3916 | |
Active Member
Sep 2016
|
![]() Quote:
Do you hear how nuts that sounds? |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: |
![]() |
#3917 |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]()
I’m no “expert” and it’s no issue to me if people love the release and think it’s definitive or whatever. I wouldn’t try to persuade anyone to think otherwise.
But I just think it’s a pointless release. It’s been established it’s the 4K master used for the blu-ray spruced up with sharpening and AI to make the film look more clean and contemporarily digital. The blu isn’t the most organic either, but I’d might as well just to stick to that and have my 4K player do the upscale since I prefer the film to look more like film. HDR isn’t worth the trade-off for me. It’s disappointing but no big deal. The blu-ray already uses a 4k master and I’ll just spend the money elsewhere. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | JMEANS (12-09-2023), Riddhi2011 (12-08-2023) |
![]() |
#3918 |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]()
There has been months and years of Cameron getting slammed on these boards for perceived lack of attention to his older movies and T2 being botched. Plus a lot of baseless rumors and a few hits regarding how these new masters would be handled since Cameron doesn't like grain on home video.
Users were going absolutely mental over a decade ago when Aliens was going to debut in HD, fearing no grain...history repeats itself etc. So yeah, there is definitely more bias against than for unless you really love Avatar. Last edited by Trekkie313; 12-08-2023 at 01:14 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|