As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
Casper 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.57
14 hrs ago
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.13
 
The Conjuring 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.13
13 hrs ago
Dan Curtis' Classic Monsters (Blu-ray)
$29.99
1 day ago
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 day ago
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
House Party 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
Jurassic World: 7-Movie Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$99.99
1 hr ago
Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)
$30.50
20 hrs ago
Jurassic World Rebirth 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
The Breakfast Club 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-09-2007, 11:57 PM   #21
EricJ EricJ is offline
Banned
 
Jul 2007
The Paradise of New England
6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hyperdine View Post
Have no fear...Fox will be here!
At this point, we're just taking them at their word that they were just holding out for the more secure BD+ coding we finally got last month, after all those overblown hacker/HD scares.
And if MGM could start recently getting back on the horse for the same reason, take that as a good sign.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2007, 12:02 AM   #22
Zod Zod is offline
Member
 
Zod's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Default

Relax people, it's still a new technology and FOX is in this to make money. They'll release on blu-ray. HD-DUD is a dead format, the only formality being the official time of death.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2007, 12:11 AM   #23
ReduxInflux ReduxInflux is offline
Expert Member
 
ReduxInflux's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
orange county, ca
22
3
Default

regarding FOX:

the longer we wait to eat, the hungrier we are! people are growing impatient and the Blu-Ray ownership base is growing. And when the food is ready, we can expect an onslaught of strong sales for FOX.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2007, 12:20 AM   #24
BorrowedTime BorrowedTime is offline
Senior Member
 
May 2007
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blublublu View Post
The first test for Fox will be their next major release on DVD.

Frankly they haven't had a major new release since "Night at the Museum" (as far as I recall), and I'm not sure what the next one would be besides the last Die Hard.

I can't see how they would not release this and The Simpsons on Blu Ray.
lol,

I'm sorry, this comment made me laugh. As soon as I read "The Simpsons", and the last few comments were about Fox. I just had the image of Ralph Wiggum standing in the middle of the "O" on the Twentieth Century Fox Logo, screaming out the FOX theme music. Damn... now I wanna see this movie again.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2007, 12:21 AM   #25
tvted tvted is offline
Active Member
 
Jun 2007
Toronto, Canada
2
1
Default

Thanks for the Bill Hunt post.

If anything its convinced me to buy CE3K to show support for the format because I'm not a fan of the film. I do hope it gets exceptional; sales for a caralogue title to prove that BD is a winner.

ted
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2007, 04:35 PM   #26
darkblueme darkblueme is offline
Expert Member
 
darkblueme's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Salt Lake City, Utah
6
78
Wink Article from The Digital Bits

Published August 9, 2007
http://www.thedigitalbits.com/mytwoc...40.html#uniema
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2007, 04:39 PM   #27
erowe83 erowe83 is offline
Senior Member
 
erowe83's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
Los Angeles, CA
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkblueme View Post
Published August 9, 2007 on
http://www.thedigitalbits.com
BADASS...
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2007, 04:40 PM   #28
BTBuck1 BTBuck1 is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
BTBuck1's Avatar
 
Jun 2006
Oceanside, CA.
507
1
Send a message via ICQ to BTBuck1 Send a message via AIM to BTBuck1 Send a message via MSN to BTBuck1 Send a message via Yahoo to BTBuck1
Default

I was smiling from ear to ear after reading that.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2007, 04:51 PM   #29
dialog_gvf dialog_gvf is offline
Moderator
 
dialog_gvf's Avatar
 
Nov 2006
Toronto
320
Default

Quote:
But when Graffeo answered this question, in the way he did, I actually felt bad for the guy. It was clear to me, and to others who were on hand to witness the exchange (and I've confirmed today that many others who were there shared the same impression), that Ken (and Universal as a whole) is under a LOT of pressure related to his studio's exclusive support of HD-DVD.
Yeah, in the video I saw a rather tired looking Graffeo who looked very old, slouching and worried (lines on the forehead).

I wonder if the Kornblau thing was a way of relieving some pressure on Graffeo? In other words "stop blaming him, the buck stops here".

If that is the case, the pressure is even more than any of us imagine. And cracks are definitely showing everywhere. Graffeo feels so persecuted that Kornblau had to come to his aid in the HiHD piece.

Quote:
There's another issue here that's worth mentioning as well. Just a few minutes before the exchange above, Graffeo was asked by an audience member about the possibility of Steven Spielberg's films appearing on HD-DVD. I believe it happens at the end of video clip #4 on the HTF. Now... you may recall that earlier this year (on 1/29 to be exact), the HD-DVD Promotional Group had listed a number of Spielberg films on their website with the suggestion that they were "Coming Soon" to HD-DVD, including Jaws, E.T. and Jurassic Park. But shortly after they were posted, which caused an understandable stir, the Group removed the titles from the site and posted a retraction. To my knowledge, nothing more on the subject of Spielberg on high-def came to light until Graffeo was asked by an audience member (at the EMA panel two weeks ago) about the possibility of Spielberg films on HD-DVD. Here's his answer:

Graffeo: In regards to the Spielberg, um... it wasn't... Steven wanted to wait for DVD til there was a higher penetration for that. Um... right now, with 100... 200,000 players and 150,000... he wants to wait til there's more penetration. Because, um... you know when you do release... and Jaws was the first Steven Spielberg that we came out with, and at that time we released we sold a million units. More than we'd ever sold on VHS. But you have to have, sort of like... I don't want to say critical mass, because you had close to 3 or 4 million households that had players... but it's too early now. And I think we have to work very close with our filmmakers because they have a very big part in what we do.

Okay... I bought that argument and I think so did everyone else at the panel. And that would have been the last word on the subject... EXCEPT that just a week later, Sony announced at Comic-Con the first Steven Spielberg film to be released on high-definition, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, EXCLUSIVELY on the Blu-ray Disc format (on 10/2). Huh? Something doesn't jive here. Given his position within the industry, and Universal's close ties with Spielberg over the years, how did Graffeo not know this was coming just a week later? And for those of you who would say that Sony controls CE3K and not Spielberg, I was told directly by Sony reps at Comic-Con that Spielberg personally approved the high-def transfer of the film. Not only that, he's recorded a new interview just for the Blu-ray release. So he HAD to have approved this. How does Universal not know that was coming? In what light does that cast Graffeo's comments at EMA from just a week earlier? And, maybe even more to the point, what does it say about Spielberg's opinion of, and position on, this high-def format war, when his first high-def disc release is a Blu-ray Disc exclusive? Add to that Lucasfilm producer Rick McCallum's comments from a few weeks ago at the Star Wars Celebration convention in Europe, to the effect that if Hollywood doesn't get its you-know-what together and end this format war soon, Lucas might bypass high-def discs altogether and release the Star Wars films in high-def via download only. What does all that say about how good this format war REALLY is for consumers, regardless of Universal's belief that having helped to drive hardware prices down so quickly justifies their position? Who, at this point, does continuing this format war really benefit?
Clearly, it now benefits only those that aren't interested in HD discs.

So, Universal is a pawn in the war against discs. And they are too poor (due to years of box office nightmares) to give up sucking from the Microsoft teet.

Gary

Oh, BH RULZ!

Last edited by dialog_gvf; 08-10-2007 at 04:53 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2007, 04:55 PM   #30
Blu Tiger Blu Tiger is offline
Special Member
 
Blu Tiger's Avatar
 
Mar 2007
Denver, CO
725
27
Default

Graffeo: "In regards to the Spielberg, um... it wasn't... Steven wanted to wait for DVD til there was a higher penetration for that. Um... right now, with 100... 200,000 players and 150,000... he wants to wait til there's more penetration. Because, um... you know when you do release..."



...and, um...you're fired!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2007, 05:09 PM   #31
whippersnapper whippersnapper is offline
Special Member
 
Jan 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dialog_gvf View Post
Yeah, in the video I saw a rather tired looking Graffeo who looked very old, slouching and worried (lines on the forehead).

I wonder if the Kornblau thing was a way of relieving some pressure on Graffeo? In other words "stop blaming him, the buck stops here".

If that is the case, the pressure is even more than any of us imagine. And cracks are definitely showing everywhere. Graffeo feels so persecuted that Kornblau had to come to his aid in the HiHD piece.



Clearly, it now benefits only those that aren't interested in HD discs.

So, Universal is a pawn in the war against discs. And they are too poor (due to years of box office nightmares) to give up sucking from the Microsoft teet.

Gary

Oh, BH RULZ!
Quote:
Yeah, in the video I saw a rather tired looking Graffeo who looked very old, slouching and worried (lines on the forehead).
I wonder if the Kornblau thing was a way of relieving some pressure on Graffeo? In other words "stop blaming him, the buck stops here".
Hey, neither Graffeo or Kornblau should worry too much. After all, the Pet Rock Company could use a new marketing guy and a CEO. Don't expect those positions would pay that much right now. But the Pet Rock future may be more promising then the holes they're digging for themselves now.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Digital Bits: Warner reveals 2008 Blu-ray plans! Blu-ray Movies - North America blitz6speed 342 02-09-2008 05:07 AM
huge blu-ray news at digital bits Blu-ray Movies - North America ndirtdigler69 5 03-20-2007 12:25 AM
Why are there no Blu-ray reviews on Digital Bits? Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology BluSmoke 2 02-17-2007 03:55 AM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:00 AM.