|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $82.99 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $101.99 20 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $124.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $39.02 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $35.99 | ![]() $19.12 | ![]() $23.79 15 hrs ago
|
![]() |
#21 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
That is why you guys should just go with a projector with a 2.35:1 screen and make an anamorphic lens (or use the zoom if the projector allows). I spent less on my whole theater than some of you spent on your TV or even your audio equipment. This is still respectable to the filmmakers intentions, in fact watching it on a projection set up akin to a theater IS the filmmakers intention. I'm loving it
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.trustedreviews.com/tvs/re...56in-LCD-TV/p1 You can even add shutter curtains on the TV if you really want to (not really though, but you CAN). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Power Member
|
![]()
Ive just used the panorama setting on my camera it dosent have a panoramic lens so it takes 3 photos and joins them together and the end result is what youd get on a 2:40.1 movie but the photo was probably even wider though by the look of it.This showed me how much more information a panoramic lens can include and its a big amount.Its worth having the black bars to see all that extra picture.Am i right in thinking a 1:78.1 or 1:85.1 movie isn't filmed with a panoramic lens then? i was watching star trek 3 the other night and Kirk,McCoy and Sulu were stood in a lift side by side facing the camera and i thought that looks great but without the black bars you wouldnt be able to fit them all in and see a shot like that at home unless you had the 21:9 tv of course.Maybe a 2:40.1 movie isnt necessarily filmed with a panoramic lens im sure you'll put me right.
Last edited by Stu123; 06-25-2010 at 06:05 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
I also hated black bars on movies but I grew to love them because its that the director of the movie wanted the person to see "everything". You get the full scope of the movie not a cropped version that full screen gives you. Give me black bars anyday.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
Sorry, but there's nothing for you to "buy." Until you understand how movies are supposed to be presented, then you'll always want the inferior "fullscreen." It's kind of like saying "I love this song!", but only hearing the chorus without ever hearing the intro and verses. You're missing the big picture. Educate yourself, and you'll realize you've been making a mistake all this time. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
I hated them when VHS started coming out with them, and just accepted it as DVD, then started seeing exactly how much more picture I'm getting. Personally, I don't even see them anymore and they don't bother me at all. *shrug* If you pay for a T-Bone Steak and the waiter gives you a Pork Chop, are you happy? That T-Bone is how the director wants you to see it and how it was intended. That Pork Chop while enjoyable at times, is how networks used to air stuff because nobody had the equipment to watch it properly. October 2011, when Star Wars comes out on Blu, if they so choose to use the "Special Editions" (I hope not) but, in Episode IV, one of the "added" scenes, there's some "Sand Dragons" that are like 80% cut off on the Full-Frame. Maybe then people will really see what's missing and what is not and accept that it's far superior to enjoy as intended. Then again, these are probably the same people who stretch the image too.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
Black Bars in a movie are what the director intended. You see more of the directors intended vision of the movie. 2 directors that swear by them and use them all the time are Steven Speilberg and James Cameron. Speilberg refuses to make a movie without them according to recent interview.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#33 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
Sep 2008
Bainbridge Island, WA
|
![]() Quote:
It's funny that Cameron released the 2D version of Avatar in 1.78:1 on disc even though it played in 2.39:1 in theaters. (The theatrical version was actually cropped to create a wide screen output.) Saving Private Ryan is also 1.78:1. No letterboxing on either of those BDs. Last edited by BIslander; 07-20-2010 at 02:21 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
Please note that AVATAR was filmed with IMAX cameras and has an OAR (Original Aspect Ratio) of 1.43:1. Therefore the next closest aspect ratio would have been 1.78:1 to be closest to the original presentation. With 2.4:1 too much would have been lost. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#35 | |
Expert Member
|
![]() Quote:
I've known people to simply have velvet panels/strips that they would afix to the sides of their display with Velcro to achieve this. Obviously a nice self masking screen system like Carada makes is great for front projection, but similar "cheap" methods can be used with big screens as well. I'm not a huge fan of using anamorphic lenses. I love OAR, but hate "dark gray" bars. I tolerate them because of my love for OAR, but still hate them and will mask whenever possible. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Blu-ray Samurai
Sep 2008
Bainbridge Island, WA
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
Congrats, Dr. Strangestu (Or How You Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bars)! |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|