As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Corpse Bride 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
1 hr ago
Airport: The Complete Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$86.13
10 hrs ago
Hard Boiled 4K (Blu-ray)
$49.99
1 day ago
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
9 hrs ago
Shin Godzilla 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.96
1 day ago
Spawn 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.99
 
In the Mouth of Madness 4K (Blu-ray)
$36.69
1 day ago
The Terminator 4K (Blu-ray)
$14.44
12 hrs ago
Looney Tunes Collector's Vault: Volume 1 (Blu-ray)
$19.99
1 hr ago
Curb Your Enthusiasm: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$122.99
7 hrs ago
The Sound of Music 4K (Blu-ray)
$37.99
 
Shudder: A Decade of Fearless Horror (Blu-ray)
$80.68
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Home Theater > Home Theater General Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-28-2007, 07:14 PM   #21
daisuke149 daisuke149 is offline
Active Member
 
Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ack_bak View Post
This Samsung LED DLP is a great set as well. I would highly recommend it as it does not have a color wheel or need to have bulbs changed:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/cus...blurayforum-20

sorry bro ive seen these day ina nd day out and their not that great. example in comparing 61" model.s Led = 3k, regular = 2100. Its not worth the extra 900 when your saving only a few hundred on bulbs and the picture isnt as bright or sharp.

Also if anyone cares to look at the screen for this carefully.. there are semi circular lines running across the screen at different points. Seen it in 8 different sets so far around atlanta.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 07:24 PM   #22
nhaase nhaase is offline
Special Member
 
Mar 2007
2
Default

I've got a 56" JVC HD-ILA, which is the same technology as the Sony SXRD (LCoS). I love it, I was looking at that and the SXRD, and chose mine because it has a more adjustable iris, so you can adjust the light more to better suit the room lighting. This fall JVC will be releasing a 58" projection TV which is only 10" deep, so while it's still not "flat panel," it's pretty close.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 07:36 PM   #23
ack_bak ack_bak is offline
Power Member
 
Mar 2007
181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daisuke149 View Post
sorry bro ive seen these day ina nd day out and their not that great. example in comparing 61" model.s Led = 3k, regular = 2100. Its not worth the extra 900 when your saving only a few hundred on bulbs and the picture isnt as bright or sharp.

Also if anyone cares to look at the screen for this carefully.. there are semi circular lines running across the screen at different points. Seen it in 8 different sets so far around atlanta.
It is 2199 via Amazon with free shipping and no tax (see the link I provided). Cannot speak for the screen issues you detected, but this set gets solid reviews from some major AV mags.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 08:03 PM   #24
mcy_999 mcy_999 is offline
Active Member
 
Mar 2007
Default

SXRD is the only to go. It is bright, fast, sharp and with superb color saturation. Get the biggest screen size that would fit right with your room. Screen size does matter if you want to create a theater like set-up. 55-60in is the minimum. The present price for the large size of LCD is still too high and not worth it. SXRD offers much faster response time than either DLP or LCD.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 08:30 PM   #25
daisuke149 daisuke149 is offline
Active Member
 
Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ack_bak View Post
It is 2199 via Amazon with free shipping and no tax (see the link I provided). Cannot speak for the screen issues you detected, but this set gets solid reviews from some major AV mags.
true but the non led version is 1500 online.

as for magazines sure but then again nearly everything in those magazines is garbage.

Having read alot of personal opinions on these sets from many many locations and personaly usage i'd say stay away from the LED systems. alot of people reporting burn light engines early on.

Btw check out the avsforum thread dedicated to the samsung LED systems. I havnt really read anythign good outta there yet.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 08:56 PM   #26
JakeNRoland JakeNRoland is offline
Expert Member
 
JakeNRoland's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Bay Area, CA
Default

Wow. Thank you everyone for you input. I think I'm sold on the SXRD. I think I was sold before I even started the thread, but it's nice to hear so much positive feedback in support of that initial thought.

Now I just need to save up and/or find some credit. LOL.

Probably going to shoot for the 55". We have a small living room. I could maybe push 60", but... that might be too much for the room.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2007, 12:25 PM   #27
rbelong2us rbelong2us is offline
Member
 
Aug 2007
Default

http://www.crutchfield.com/S-3z5ZfX0...chDisplay=Sony

[quote]Details:

» 55" widescreen HDTV (16:9 aspect ratio)
» built-in digital (ATSC) and analog (NTSC) tuners for over-the-air TV broadcasts (antenna required)
» built-in QAM cable TV tuner receives unscrambled programs without a set-top box (cable service required)
» 1080p 3-SXRD light engine (1920 x 1080 pixels)
» Motionflow™ 120Hz anti-blur technology for clearer motion
» 2.5-millisecond pixel response time
» 130°(H) x 60°(V) viewing angle
» adjustable/dynamic Advanced Iris for improved contrast and black level
» BRAVIA Engine™ EX digital video processing
» adjustable DRC MultiFunction v1 (upconverts lower-quality video signals)
» built-in stereo speakers (12 watts x 2)
» multibrand remote control
» BRAVIA Theatre Sync™ remote control networking system (HDMI-CEC)
» picture settings memory for each video input
» 8 A/V inputs, including:
• 3 composite video
• 1 S-video
• 2 component video (accepts signals up to 1080p)
• 3 HDMI digital audio/video inputs
(accepts signals up to 1080p — 60Hz, 24Hz)

» PC input: analog RGB (D-Sub 15-pin)
» RF input for antenna/cable signals
» optical digital audio output for Dolby® Digital
» compatible with optional BRAVIA Internet Video Link
» power consumption: 240 watts
» Energy Star® compliant
» 49-5/8"W x 36-1/4"H x 15-5/8"D
» weight: 81.7 lbs.
» warranty: 1 year parts & labor — in-home service
» Want more peace of mind? Extended Service Plans Available

Ok so this set looks awesome and I'm also in the market to upgrade soon but I have a question about Hz that I know some of you can answer.

Above I have bolded two lines that seem to be conflicting. I know there not, its just my ignorance, but can someone explain inputing 60hz-24hz into this set and the 120hz this set displays at?

I hope my question is clear, I'm of to work so hopefully it make sense.

Thanks for the help in advance.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2007, 12:56 PM   #28
jnm422 jnm422 is offline
Active Member
 
jnm422's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Montgomery Village, MD
57
Default Panasonic Plasma

OP, I know you are already sold on the sony, but, burn-in is not as much a problem as some may lead you to believe. It was back when plasmas first came on the scene. Not anymore. I've read in multiple places that the burn-in fear is overhyped. These new 1080p panasonic plasmas are awesome.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2007, 01:31 PM   #29
groovyone groovyone is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
groovyone's Avatar
 
May 2007
PSNetwork: groovyone
Default

The new 60" Bravia A3000 just popped up at my local Best Buy for $2700. Very tempting, but I am thinking of holding out for a 52" XBR4.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2007, 02:03 PM   #30
Teazle Teazle is offline
Power Member
 
Teazle's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Canada
1
Default

[QUOTE=rbelong2us;191595]http://www.crutchfield.com/S-3z5ZfX0...chDisplay=Sony

Quote:
Details:

» 55" widescreen HDTV (16:9 aspect ratio)
» built-in digital (ATSC) and analog (NTSC) tuners for over-the-air TV broadcasts (antenna required)
» built-in QAM cable TV tuner receives unscrambled programs without a set-top box (cable service required)
» 1080p 3-SXRD light engine (1920 x 1080 pixels)
» Motionflow™ 120Hz anti-blur technology for clearer motion
» 2.5-millisecond pixel response time
» 130°(H) x 60°(V) viewing angle
» adjustable/dynamic Advanced Iris for improved contrast and black level
» BRAVIA Engine™ EX digital video processing
» adjustable DRC MultiFunction v1 (upconverts lower-quality video signals)
» built-in stereo speakers (12 watts x 2)
» multibrand remote control
» BRAVIA Theatre Sync™ remote control networking system (HDMI-CEC)
» picture settings memory for each video input
» 8 A/V inputs, including:
• 3 composite video
• 1 S-video
• 2 component video (accepts signals up to 1080p)
• 3 HDMI digital audio/video inputs
(accepts signals up to 1080p — 60Hz, 24Hz)

» PC input: analog RGB (D-Sub 15-pin)
» RF input for antenna/cable signals
» optical digital audio output for Dolby® Digital
» compatible with optional BRAVIA Internet Video Link
» power consumption: 240 watts
» Energy Star® compliant
» 49-5/8"W x 36-1/4"H x 15-5/8"D
» weight: 81.7 lbs.
» warranty: 1 year parts & labor — in-home service
» Want more peace of mind? Extended Service Plans Available

Ok so this set looks awesome and I'm also in the market to upgrade soon but I have a question about Hz that I know some of you can answer.

Above I have bolded two lines that seem to be conflicting. I know there not, its just my ignorance, but can someone explain inputing 60hz-24hz into this set and the 120hz this set displays at?

I hope my question is clear, I'm of to work so hopefully it make sense.

Thanks for the help in advance.
For a 24Hz signal (eg feature film on BD captured at 24fps) each frame is displayed five times in a second (5 x 24 = 120). The display itself keeps going at 120Hz, it's just that the frames are duplicated.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2007, 02:20 PM   #31
Branden Branden is offline
Senior Member
 
Branden's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
Calgary, Alberta
28
559
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rbelong2us View Post
can someone explain inputing 60hz-24hz into this set and the 120hz this set displays at?
movies are filmed at 24 frames per second (24p, or 24Hz), television in NA is broadcast at 30Hz because electrical AC in NA is 60Hz. a device that runs at 60Hz can only display images running at a factor of 60 (60/2=30). in order for consumers in NA to be able to watch movies in the native 24Hz the TV converts the 60Hz AC to 120Hz which is now able to display movies at 24Hz (120/5=24).

most TVs are displaying 30fps but the source is only 24fps, essentially meaning there's 6 'hiccups' per second. this is most noticable during scenes where the camera does a slow pan, it won't seem very smooth. a 120Hz TV fixes this.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2007, 03:10 PM   #32
cawgijoe cawgijoe is offline
Special Member
 
Feb 2007
1
Default

I really like the Sony XBR LCD's, but they are not cheap.

My brother-in-law has the Sony 60" A2000 series SXRD set and he loves it.
The picture is terrific.

The new SXRD sets are priced very well.

The downside has been mentioned here.....not skiny like the LCD's.....the bulb will evetually need to be replaced.....and even though they are bright, you still want to make sure light doesn't shine on the screen.

You get alot of value for these sets.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 08:02 AM   #33
LeoneFan LeoneFan is offline
Senior Member
 
Jan 2007
Default

Great choice, SXRD all the way. I'm waiting for the XBR5 series SXRD coming in October. I hope the 70" comes in under $5000.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 08:15 AM   #34
richard lichtenfelt richard lichtenfelt is offline
Power Member
 
richard lichtenfelt's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
I'm not drunk, I'm just tired cause I been up all night drinking.
3
Default

With a rear projection tv you have to replace the bulbs every few years at a cost of usually $300 to $600. LCD half brightness after 20yrs of watching 10hrs a day. If cost is the difference, in the long run the lcd is less expensive. Also, lcd tvs use far less electricity to run.
When you get right down it both are excellent if you invest in a quality brand.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 08:31 AM   #35
Cyan Cyan is offline
Active Member
 
Jul 2007
Default

The OP said that he primarily plans on playing video games...everytime I've looked into buying a plasma, I was told that you should not play video games on plasma, as they have a tendency towards screen burn. Is this incorrect?

I researched alot of TVs before I bought mine, and ended up with a 65" Mitsubishi DLP. I thought the Sony was impressive, but, Sony televisions are pretty ridiculously overpriced, and often you're not really getting anything more out of it, other than the Sony name..or what you do get isn't worth an extra $1800.

Fortunately, this does not appear to be the case with Sony BluRay players
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 12:56 PM   #36
daisuke149 daisuke149 is offline
Active Member
 
Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyan View Post
The OP said that he primarily plans on playing video games...everytime I've looked into buying a plasma, I was told that you should not play video games on plasma, as they have a tendency towards screen burn. Is this incorrect?

I researched alot of TVs before I bought mine, and ended up with a 65" Mitsubishi DLP. I thought the Sony was impressive, but, Sony televisions are pretty ridiculously overpriced, and often you're not really getting anything more out of it, other than the Sony name..or what you do get isn't worth an extra $1800.

Fortunately, this does not appear to be the case with Sony BluRay players
sorry bro but comparing a mitsu dlp to the sony sxrd isnt even a competition. the mitsu's are pretty terrible side by side in clarity, sharpness, colors, brightness contrast. We've had many many mitsu's come thru our store and ill be honest. We had to mark one brand new 65" 1080p dlp mitsu at 1200 before anyone would even consider buying it cus the floor model sat next to a sony 60" sxrd. at 1101.93 someone purchased it.

I myself wouldnt.

You do save money no questions but in terms of quality you do get alot more with the sony.

as for the person talking about bulbs etc and lifespans. Half life of an lcd doesnt matter. neither for a plasma. Most recent studies show most plasma's realistically lasting average 6-7 years and lcd's 10 years. This is still their expected true lifetime not their "bulb half life".
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 01:13 PM   #37
Cyan Cyan is offline
Active Member
 
Jul 2007
Default

I absolutely looked at a side by side comparison for them. Yes, there was some difference in clarity. No, there was not nearly enough to warrant the Sony model costing almost 2 grand more than the one I bought. In fairness, I bought the high end 65" DLP, which is largely superior to the other versions.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 09:38 PM   #38
daisuke149 daisuke149 is offline
Active Member
 
Aug 2007
Default

i know the model ur talking about dont worry about that. Its still not nearly as good as the sxrd's tho. good bang for the buck. but in the end a hyundai isnt a bmw. ya know?
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Home Theater > Home Theater General Discussion

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Projection vs. Plasma/LCD Home Theater General Discussion DealsR4theDevil 14 12-31-2008 04:24 AM
Rear Projection vs. LCD Display Theory and Discussion thehellgate911 68 03-27-2008 08:13 PM
Sony lcd vs. rear wega projection lcd Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology andyn1080 1 01-20-2008 05:16 AM
Rear Projection vs. LCD Home Theater General Discussion HDJK 6 03-05-2007 12:16 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:19 PM.