|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $24.96 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $19.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $27.13 1 day ago
| ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $27.57 1 day ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $29.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.95 |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
#2 |
Special Member
Jun 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Blu-ray Knight
Jan 2006
www.blurayoasis.com
|
![]()
It's a shame to see that one little piece of bad news after endless months of nothing but nonstop good news before and since, combined with a healthy dose of FUD and "marketing" leads to cage rattling reactions like what we're seeing in this thread.
That's really a shame. ![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Senior Member
Feb 2007
|
![]() Quote:
If you want to buy into HD DVD that's your call, but don't think the studios will start churning out titles from the 30's, 40's, 50's & 60's just because you have helped to keep HDM a minority sport. Two formats = customer confusion and failure to make HD disc a mass market format. Limited market = limited resources available to remaster & press HD titles. Support Blu-ray as the one HD disc format! That way you are more likely to see a HD disc catalogue that will deliver the deep catalogue rarities (and Criterion will start to release on Blu-ray too). Just remember, every time you buy a HD DVD title, to tell yourself "I am helping to prolong the format war and helping Microsoft achieve their HD-lite download ambitions". Maybe that will bring you (and others doing the same) to your senses. |
|
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Jul 2007
|
![]()
HD = Heavy Dung
|
![]() |
#8 |
Active Member
|
![]()
Another good point would be this, why spend $500 on HD-DVD support if you truly do love movies? $500 is on average around 22 Blu Ray discs or 30-50 regular DVDs: you're much better off promoting the new standard [Blu-Ray] or continuing to enjoy the current standard [DVD]
As for HD-DVD? Why don't you go out and buy a cassette player instead? There's a lot of good records out there on casette that need a good home. And at least cassette players are still good for recording and listening to the radio. |
![]() |
#9 | |
Expert Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
#10 |
Moderator
Jul 2004
Belgium
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Power Member
|
![]() Quote:
Addendum: By that time the market may have changed ... Last edited by Teazle; 08-31-2007 at 07:49 PM. Reason: Addendum, literal |
|
![]() |
#16 | |
Active Member
May 2007
Lewisville, part of the ★DALLAS★ metroplex, in the Republic Of Texas
|
![]() Quote:
Supporting both formats just means you have the money for both, and the love of movies for both. This tiresome 'war' will be over one day, sooner then later, and either BD will have won, and those with HD-DVD players (or combo players), will still enjoy their movies, or both formats will have lost due to average Joe's not giving a crap, and keeping with standard DVD, or the third, and most likely option, downloading of movies will have taken off, (like downloading music), and no one will give a crap about little shiny discs. I personally, over the last few days, have begun to think it's the third option that will ultimately prevail, given the idiotic nature of most consumers, that don't recognize quality in the first place; SACD anyone? I mean, let's look back...BETA lost. Heck, even further back, Quadraphonic sound lost, or how about something a bit more modern, Mini Discs lost as well. All were better formats (with Mini Discs clearly having advantages over CD'S), and yet all lost. It's not a matter of BD winning, or HD-DVD, it's a matter of High Def winning, and I just don't think that it will. It seems the same people that think that downloading music, and listening with crappy ear buds, are the same sort of people that are content with watching videos on tiny little screens (video iPods), and prefer pan and scan. We are the minority when it comes to demanding better audio and video, and we will be unless something radical happens. |
|
![]() |
#17 |
Banned
Aug 2007
|
![]()
Agreed COMPLETELY with the ABOVE, It's like I said I'd rather buy an HD DVD over a standard dvd, nothing more, nothing less.
It had nothing to do with me saying HD DVD was greater or better then Blu Ray. |
![]() |
#18 |
Active Member
Aug 2007
|
![]()
Going neutral simply prolongs the nonsense. BluRay is superior technology, BluRay still has significant support with movie distributors as well as Computer manufacturers and CE manfacturers. Blu Ray is dominating everywhere else in the world, including North America (2:1). So your going out and "wasting" money just so you can see a couple of movies offered on one format vs. another? This lacks all sense of logical thinking. This is still a niche market, it needs time to grow, but it can only grow with ONE format. If you like HD-DVD and have a player then go with it. If you like BluRay and have a player then go with that, but to go with both simply defeats the HDM medium, gives Microsoft a clear victory (one way or another - codec licesning or HD download) and keeps the consumers confused. It's a TIE!! Like kissing your sister!!! No one like ties, they like winners.
|
![]() |
#19 |
Power Member
|
![]()
After a bit more thought ... OK, your main beef with BD is that there isn't full studio support -- you can't have all the movies. I agree that it would be intolerable _never_ to be able to watch Universal and Paramount movies on HDM at home. But suppose you wait a year or 18 mo. before deciding whether or not to invest in a HD-DVD-capable player. Then there are two cases.
At that time either: a) the format war is over or almost over. Universal is neutral, BD is on the cusp of victory. No point in buying HD-DVD hardware then: you picked the winner out of the gate and saved some coin and a lot of hassle. b) the war still drags on. OK, in this case admittedly it appears that it's either buy those HD-DVDs or maybe you never get them on HDM ever. So then go dual-format. At this point the players and the discs will be cheaper than they are now, so again you saved some coin. Either way, you still get all the movies eventually. Given that you already have Blu-ray, the only thing you stand to gain by going dual-format _now_ is a handful of extra movies in the short term at relatively large expense. Talk about diminishing returns. You already have the better type of player and access to lots of HDM movies (actually the majority of them) and with better picture and sound. Whereas if you simply wait, you will eventually get the movies you want, no matter what. And you help speed the end of the war by not supporting HD-DVD. And save some coin. That's the way I see it at any rate. |
![]() |
#20 |
Special Member
Jun 2007
|
![]()
I don't even see the point of posting this here on the Blu-ray forum, unless it is a cry for help. If I were to buy an HD-DVD player, I certainly wouldn't post it here.
Personaly do what you want, but in this war, your supplying bullits to one side and guns to the other. |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Will format neutral members continue buying hd dvd now that Warner has switched? | General Chat | drb124 | 7 | 01-05-2008 01:26 PM |
Format neutral supporters wanted - from HD DVD to Blu-ray! | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | tron3 | 176 | 11-10-2007 03:35 PM |
Switching to format neutral... | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | ben7ben3 | 177 | 08-22-2007 11:40 AM |
Format Neutral Members.... | Blu-ray Movies - North America | drb124 | 26 | 06-20-2007 10:25 PM |
|
|