|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $35.99 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $33.49 20 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.49 22 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $137.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $30.48 | ![]() $27.57 | ![]() $24.96 |
|
View Poll Results: Size of Your Primary HDTV and if You'd Go Smaller or Larger Next Time. | |||
32" |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 6.85% |
40"/42" |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
35 | 15.98% |
50"/52" |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
73 | 33.33% |
55" |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
20 | 9.13% |
58"/60" |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
27 | 12.33% |
65" |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
23 | 10.50% |
More than 65" |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
29 | 13.24% |
I'd go with something smaller than I have now. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 0.46% |
I'd go with something larger than I have now. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
77 | 35.16% |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 219. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#21 |
Blu-ray Count
Jul 2007
Montreal, Canada
|
![]()
went with ove 65" since I believe fits the spirit of the question better. In my HT I have a Projector with a 10' wide image used for movie & gaming, in the FR a 61" TV used for TV watching/recording. I also did not answer the second part since my HT can't fit a larger screen (but if possible I would go higher), 10' gives a height of around 5.5' and so it is around 2' from the floor (any lower and the front row would interfere with the viewing from the second row. On the other hand I am thinking of the 65" Pany for the GR, so that one could eventually be a bit bigger.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
I recently moved up from a Sony 40" XBR4 LCD to a Panasonic 50" VT20 plasma. Gorgeous upgrade all-around. The 40" Sony is my bedroom TV now. Got a free Dynex 19" LCD which will go into my son's bedroom the Christmas, where the Sony S350 Blu-ray player resides. It'll be neat to give my son HD in his room.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Active Member
|
![]()
On our main system (the living/family room) we have the 47" Phillips set. In our second system (the master bedroom) we have the 46" Samsung.
When we upgrade (maybe next year) it will be to a 3D TV of about the same size. I think that this is about the limit for the size of rooms that we have. We are sitting about 9ish feet away from them now. I am not making any bones about this, as I know that it can cause some wildy differing opinions and heat. As I look at either of our two TVs, I really wonder how we tolerated our 32" CRT Sharps 16:9 TV, it seemed so very small compared to our current monsters! |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
At this point I am using a 50" Pioneer Elite Pioneer Elite Kuro PRO-111FD but I hope that the 100" 2D/3D HDI Laser TV expected to be released next year will cost as projected and perform as well as expected.
![]() If it does, I hope to purchase one next year. Rich |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
Active Member
|
![]()
I should have looked at the poll more closely. I answered that my HDTV is 32" (absolutely TERRIBLE cheapo walmart LCD set, I actually hate watching it more and more every day. I used to have a Samsung CRT HD display, which provided a far more staisfactory picture, but the power supply on it burned out about 2 days after the warranty expired; it still runs but it emits an absolutely terrible high-pitched screech), but I plan on upgrading soon.
I am currently working on purchasing a new house, and once that happens, my plan is to buy a 50 or 55 inch plasma. It gives me a good excuse to wait and see what Panasonic has to offer next year. I am hesitant to purchase another Samsung after my experience with my CRT and my current LCD, but I will be sure to look into next years' offerings from them, and reviews of their sets. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|