|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() £49.99 | ![]() £22.99 | ![]() £9.99 | ![]() £39.99 | ![]() £30.60 | ![]() £19.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() £16.99 | ![]() £9.99 | ![]() £16.99 | ![]() £14.99 | ![]() £1.90 | ![]() £9.99 |
![]() |
#21 |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]()
I think I know which scenes they are talking about and I can see why they felt the need to do it - it does look very ropey and would look worse in HD of course.
Still feel we should have the choice though. Either way Im still buying it. |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Member
|
![]() Quote:
Not a deal breaker for me. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
The link posted yesterday seems to suggest they have also (badly) altered the close up of the Angel of Death's face. This was always just a practical effect, not a really shoddy optical like the tarantula. Sprucing up crappy opticals, which have a sort of digital look to them anyway, is one thing. Changing a practical effect to a digital one is blasphemous. And not something I'm willing to put my money down for.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
Member
|
![]() Quote:
As always I'll judge for myself after it arrives and I get a chance to view it. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Power Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
Eh, they're fine I guess. The face hasn't been replaced with a digital version like the previous article suggests, just a digital background. The lightning fork looks pretty stupid though.
Would love some caps of any alterations to the tarantula |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
Blu-ray Ninja
Sep 2009
|
![]()
I actually like them too, but I just think the backlash is just for lack of choice between this and the original. If they included both versions in this package, this would be a non-problem with people.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
another article about the "enhancements"
very disappointing from a purist standpoint to say the least. grrr............. ![]() ![]() http://www.sfx.co.uk/2012/09/28/blog...r-desecration/ |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Senior Member
Oct 2009
|
![]()
Frank Collins review:
...Putting the ethics of whether you should go back and revise or enhance films to one side, I believe not including the original, restored version without the enhanced effects on this release is an error of judgement. Both versions should have been on the disc to satisfy fans, old and new, and to quote Marcus Hearn, fulfill 'the efforts that have been made to present [these films] as most British audience-members would have originally seen them.' Clearly they never saw the film with CGI clouds, smoke and water and I'm sure many of us would like the choice to see the restored film as such... |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|