|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $45.00 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $27.95 1 hr ago
| ![]() $82.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $26.59 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.95 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.99 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $41.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $20.99 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $47.49 1 hr ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $101.99 |
![]() |
#1 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
Can there be stricter enforcement on people who create threads in the North America BD section, for titles that have yet to see one shred of confirmation of even existing at that point?
If there is a race/prize to being the OP in the most number of threads on there, then disregard this as I apologize for not knowing about that in advance of asking this -- but otherwise, there seems no logical reason to race (with yourself or 1 other apparently, since there's only 1-2 real culprits of doing this repeatedly) to try and start a thread with no known information. That seems to be what the "wishlist" section is for, is it not?? ![]() So these entries of "this should hopefully be released sometime soon" can stop clogging up the forum for those of us who like actual information to be posted about and be available at the time of posting? This has been an ongoing problem in that section for a while now, I'm aware. But now it's being noticed that those who do that, are now going into other subsections of the forum and creating threads for things that either: -do not exist, period. -have barely even been announced -have NO information/details to them other than "coming soon" -pre-orders for titles that have no pre-order links even available on any major retailer's site, and are not even released in theaters yet It wouldn't be a problem if those who feel the desperate need to be an OP on everything, actually UPDATED the thread once information is known 6-8 months later. But just to create a thread and then never return to it, & have to have a Mod input the relevant information many months later seems ridiculous. |
Thanks given by: | AutomaticDriver (01-06-2015), detective392 (01-06-2015), Ray O. Blu (01-10-2015), rickah88 (01-06-2015) |
|
|
![]() |
|
|