Vote Blu at M. Bay's Site

[B-rad]

Thanks for the link. Registered and voted.

[gearyt]

Originally Posted by Living Near Shamu

I can't vote because I'm not registered. I'm not registered because I haven't gotten the ok email from their admin

also...

[Mystique]

I voted for BLU!

[LynxFX]

Blu-ray - 96
HD DVD - 13

I think the choice is clear.

[Bullet]

Registered. Voted.

Blu-Ray - 98 (81%)
HD-dvd - 13 (10%)

[cartman781]

Did my part

[CptGreedle]

I voted too. Over 80% Blu.

[monkyman]

Voted and posted.

[HMtheJJ]

"Quote:
Originally Posted by krawhitham
I voted HD-DVD

They both can produce the same quality movies but unlike Blu-Ray any HD-DVD player I buy today will always be able to play future movies and all of the extra features.
Voted HD for the same reasons."


can anyone see the problem here???? just how stupid can they be, no wonder they chose HD DVD cuz they dont even know their own format.

[CptGreedle]

Well i do not know about HD DVD, but I do know that many older BD player can not play the newer movies, at least not the extras. Profile 1.1. and 2.0 will play the movies but not the extras on older players, and in some cases the players might not be able to play the discs either. But this is not a real issue in the long run since the requirement is that all new ones support 1.1 now, and the best selling player already does. Only early adopters that can probably afford a new machine will be unable to watch the extras until they buy a new machine. Any consumer new to the market should not have to worry as long as they get a new model.

[blueblood]

Voted Blu

BLU 106
DUD 14

[ckenisell]

Originally Posted by CptGreedle

Well i do not know about HD DVD, but I do know that many older BD player can not play the newer movies, at least not the extras. Profile 1.1. and 2.0 will play the movies but not the extras on older players, and in some cases the players might not be able to play the discs either. But this is not a real issue in the long run since the requirement is that all new ones support 1.1 now, and the best selling player already does. Only early adopters that can probably afford a new machine will be unable to watch the extras until they buy a new machine. Any consumer new to the market should not have to worry as long as they get a new model.

I wonder how many early adopters of non-PS3, non 1.1 or later profile Blu-Ray players there really are. Although they are out there (and probably a member of this forum), I bet their numbers pale in comparison to PS3 owners.

[FastEddie]

I was the 14th bluray voter I left them with this one tasty tidbit and no one could argue it. One guy tried but was shot down quickly.

"My vote is for Blu-Ray, anyone that says HD-DVD is a better format is a fool. Now that doesnt mean that picture quality or audio quality is currently much better in either format but that is currently, not in the future. So you can argue how simular this movie looked to that movie, or how Transformers on HD-DVD has great sound,but Blu-Ray has higher bitrate and greater capacity. The 51g HD-DVD is nothing when compaired to a 100g or 200g Blu-Ray. And anyone that says most movies currently fit on 25g and 30g discs so we dont need the extra space is just being dumb. With greater capacity, we can increase bitrates,use less compression,and with the greater size you can one day have multiple versions of movies or entire hd trilogys with bonus hd content on single discs. HD-DVD Works for now, Blu-Ray works for the future.

Remember, we are going to be using this format for a while if DVD is any indication, and in a few years I bet ALOT more people will have 1080p sets."


p.s. When I voted it was hddvd-13, bluray-14, so in that time hddvd got 1 vote, bluray almost 100 lol.

[DNR7265]

Done and done.

[Jroxproductions]

HD DVD 15 11.11%
Blu-Ray 111 82.22%
Both 5 3.70%
None 2 1.48%
I'll sit this one out 1 0.74%
Don't care/don't know, I still have my VHS tapes. 1 0.74%


LOL @ THE LANDSLIDE...

[Flying172]

113 (82.48%) to 15 (10.95%) after my vote.

Go Blu!

[GTP]

Voted for truth.