|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $9.62 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.96 1 hr ago
| ![]() $49.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $36.69 | ![]() $34.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $13.99 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.99 | ![]() $80.68 | ![]() $29.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $72.99 | ![]() $37.99 | ![]() $7.50 5 hrs ago
|
![]() |
#481 |
Member
|
![]()
Grammar is indeed important, but attacking a non-native speaker on that is a bit unfair.
![]() That said, I never understood why bars on the sides of a 16:9 screen are deemed so horrendous. By that logic, one should watch films shot in 2.35:1 AR as cropped on the sides, so that you don't have to bear the sight of black bars on the upper and lower portions of the screen... But this need of filling up the tv set only seems to arise when it comes to 1.33:1 or 1.37:1 aspect ratios. |
![]() |
![]() |
#482 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() ![]() Joking aside, if a show was shot and intended for 4:3, leave it be. 4:3 is what was the original intended look of the show and that should be preserved. However, I'm I bit more forgiving to this because the original creator was involved with this widescreen version (like The Wire), so hopefully that means it should look passable even if it's not the original intended version. However, there's a fine line for stuff like this and those lines being crossed is what leads us to disasters like Buffy HD or the Dragon Ball Z season set Blu-rays. Last edited by CrazyBlu-RayFan; 07-30-2018 at 02:42 PM. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | flyonthewall2983 (07-31-2018), trippledx3 (07-30-2018) |
![]() |
#486 | |||
Active Member
Dec 2011
|
![]()
Ha! For one second I thought you guys ment Ronnie, as he wasn't in the Vic, Shane and Lem pic. Shame what Jace did though....
Quote:
I need to know something. Did they show The Shield on US TV in 4:3 for ALL seasons... 1 through 7? Or did they stop airing the show in 4:3 after season 5? Quote:
Note: Seinfeld doesn't exist on BD yet, but they are showing an HD version cropped in 16:9 and it is really bad. So bad in fact I would agree with Bates. I think Seinfeld used almost all of the full frame for its 4:3 composition, so there isn't possible to make a 16:9 version without cropping the original 4:3 frame(s). Last edited by Renascent; 07-30-2018 at 10:43 PM. Reason: Merging post |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#487 | |
Expert Member
|
![]() Quote:
Aspect Ratio 1.33 : 1 (cropped US original broadcast version) 1.78 : 1 (international and Sony DVD aspect ratio) For reference here's what they say for The X-Files: Aspect Ratio 1.66 : 1 (Approx) (Season 1 - 4 Full Frame) 1.78 : 1 (Season 5 - 9 Full Frame) 4:3 (Seasons 1-9) (Original Broadcast), (Seasons 1-4) (DVD) 16 : 9 (Seasons 5-9) (DVD), (Seasons 1-9) (Blu Ray) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#488 | |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#489 | ||
Active Member
Dec 2011
|
![]() Quote:
Aspect Ratio 2.00 : 1 (4k UHD ProRes) But the first season is clearly in 1.78:1. In case someone posted wrong information on IMDB, I wanted to confirm it with someone who actually saw The Shield when it aired in the US. In regards to X-files, this is what the reviewer had to say about the Blu-ray set: https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-X.../59724/#Review Quote:
*This happened with my VHS copy of Star Wars E:II. The movie was full-screen in 4:3, no bars. When Yoda and Master Windu is talking in front of the senate entrance, only one of them are visible. To add more misery, the last 5 seconds of the movie is the entire widescreen frame compressed into a 4:3 image. All of the sudden everyone were very slim and thin. Last edited by Renascent; 07-30-2018 at 11:17 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#490 | |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#491 |
Active Member
Dec 2011
|
![]()
On HBO Nordic (Norway) the first season is shown in 1.78:1 while the second season is shown in 2:1. I thought it was weird why the aspect ratio changed all of the sudden, but it makes sense now.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#494 |
Active Member
|
![]()
I'm an OAR guy but my take on it is that it's not a big deal as long as the reframing is done with care. A couple posts up is a video about reframing Seinfeld episodes and what is missing when going from 4:3 to 16:9. Look, I've watched a lot of Seinfeld and whenever I catch an HD episode on TBS I've never once thought to myself "oh my God, they completely butchered this scene, you used to be able to see Jerry's kitchen table!". I remember the jokes, the visual gags, all that stuff quite well, but if you put a gun to my head I honestly couldn't tell you what's actually no longer visible in those HD episodes (except educated guesses like "Jerry's feet" or "the ceiling"). Sure I'd prefer OAR but honestly these HD remasters are pretty dang good.
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | LPMA (07-31-2018) |
![]() |
#495 | |
Active Member
Dec 2011
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#496 | |
Expert Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#499 |
Member
|
![]()
As much as the intended AR is 4:3, this show was shot in 16:9. So the show can work both ways and there shouldn't be any cropping made. If one wants to enjoy it in 4:3, all is needed is to set the image on the player or tv as to apply black bars on the sides, and only have the intended part of the frame that was on the original broadcast.
IMDb too labels the 4:3 "cropped", so it's clear the full frame has a 16:9 AR. |
![]() |
![]() |
#500 | |
Active Member
Dec 2011
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|