|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 3D Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $14.99 | ![]() $11.99 | ![]() $21.28 | ![]() $14.99 | ![]() $18.15 | ![]() $9.55 | ![]() $9.55 | ![]() $14.99 | ![]() $9.37 |
![]() |
#41 | |
Senior Member
Apr 2009
Long Island N,Y,
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Senior Member
Apr 2009
Long Island N,Y,
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
Special Member
Mar 2015
the colonies
|
![]()
Not sure when or where I got it, but my copy is region free (tested it on both my region A and region B 3D players. Disc and box are absent of any region markings.
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | the13thman (12-12-2020) |
![]() |
#48 |
Special Member
Nov 2009
In a bunker
|
![]()
Just watched Spiders this evening. Other than one hyperstereo shot of Manhattan I'd say this is has the most insipid 3D of any natively shot film that I've seen. I can't think of any post-converted films from the last several years that have worse 3D; Spiders, for me, is a great example of how native doesn't equal good. Still, if you love a giant spider...
|
![]() |
![]() |
#49 | ||
Moderator
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
http://www.dvdcompare.net/comparison....php?fid=23181 |
||
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Telegram Sam (01-27-2020) |
![]() |
#50 |
Special Member
Nov 2009
In a bunker
|
![]()
Ha ha! I can't imagine sitting through this film in 2D (can't really imagine watching it in 3D again if I'm honest). If I'm being generous, some of the less giant spiders in long shots didn't look too awful and, overall, the film had a reasonable look (for a cheapie), but the humourless script and performances were its biggest downfall (along with the mostly poor 3D).
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | the13thman (01-28-2020) |
![]() |
#51 |
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]()
So this business of one camera picking up reflections that the other is not, what did the camera people do wrong when they were shooting this and how is this issue avoided on other natively shot movies? I understand what is happening but I'm wondering how could they have prevented it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#52 | |
Special Member
Nov 2009
In a bunker
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | levcore (06-23-2020) |
![]() |
#54 | |
Special Member
Nov 2009
In a bunker
|
![]() Quote:
I honestly think that in films with more experienced people working on them they're able to minimize or completely remove the issue by being more careful what they put in front of the cameras, but you just don't notice they've done it. My guess is that the better native films had someone on the set looking out for exactly this problem. (I think I read somewhere that on Avatar Cameron put in things like helmet screens digitally after the event specifically to get around the problem.) |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | levcore (06-23-2020) |
![]() |
#55 |
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]()
I do have A Haunting in Salem and now you mention it, I recall the exact same issue with reflections!
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Telegram Sam (06-24-2020) |
![]() |
#57 |
Power Member
|
![]()
Watched it last night. I give this a rating of 4.25.
Quality of Depth 5/5. Great depth. Quality of Pops 3/5. Not much pops. A shattering scene in the beginning had a great pop but the rest of the few ones ljust popped average to below average distance. Quality of Layering 4/5. Above average feel of 3D throughout. Quality of Ghosting Minimization 5/5. Very few and far between ghosting. An example of scene with ghosting is when the couple were in stairs and went down and as they walked through the corridor to exit the building, there is ghosting, more apparent on the woman's legs. English Subtitles have zero ghosting. Last edited by Blu-Ray 3D President; 12-12-2020 at 01:39 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|