As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Casper 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.57
5 hrs ago
The Conjuring 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.13
4 hrs ago
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 day ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
Dan Curtis' Classic Monsters (Blu-ray)
$29.99
16 hrs ago
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.13
 
Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)
$30.50
11 hrs ago
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
House Party 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
1 day ago
Superman 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
The Breakfast Club 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-15-2021, 10:05 PM   #1
Mose Harper Mose Harper is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
Mose Harper's Avatar
 
Jul 2014
31
514
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jkoffman View Post
Are the publicity stills on the Criterion website proven to be actual scans of their releases? I honestly don't know, but I'm inclined to think it might not be a definitive representation of their release.
2K restoration alludes to that being the right read of all this.

Sad to say.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2021, 10:19 PM   #2
jkoffman jkoffman is offline
Banned
 
Oct 2015
U.S.
363
4990
660
86
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mose Harper View Post
2K restoration alludes to that being the right read of all this.

Sad to say.
OK, maybe I didn't phrase that well. Are all of the movie stills on Criterion's site actual scans of their specific releases? I'm just thinking more historically in the industry, that photo images from a film are not necessarily directly from the same presentation.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2021, 10:22 PM   #3
dylrichard02 dylrichard02 is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
dylrichard02's Avatar
 
Feb 2019
In the mouth of madness
590
2198
271
9
10
6
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jkoffman View Post
OK, maybe I didn't phrase that well. Are all of the movie stills on Criterion's site actual scans of their specific releases? I'm just thinking more historically in the industry, that photo images from a film are not necessarily directly from the same presentation.
It's possible that Fox could've licensed stills for promotional purposes. Granted 2K and HD aren't exactly the same. It's possible it's a new transfer.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2021, 10:09 PM   #4
MifuneFan MifuneFan is online now
Blu-ray Emperor
 
MifuneFan's Avatar
 
Mar 2012
New York City
27
1143
69
Default

Those screenshots look damn good, I had no idea the original BD looked like that either. For some reason I had it in my mind that it was a bad transfer. So, yeah, I guess the biggest draw for this release are the extras? Sort of like Dr. Strangelove in that regard, except not as compelling. I really like the cover art though, it would make for a nice poster.

edit: The artist has the original art without the cover treatment, as well as some original sketches for it on his instagram

https://www.instagram.com/accounts/login/

Last edited by MifuneFan; 11-15-2021 at 10:14 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2021, 10:13 PM   #5
dylrichard02 dylrichard02 is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
dylrichard02's Avatar
 
Feb 2019
In the mouth of madness
590
2198
271
9
10
6
1
Default

I'd really like to see those new interviews, I'm a big fan of this film, the Coens, and the cast of this one. I only spent $4 on the old one technically. So I guess I might go for this during a 50% off sale.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2021, 07:49 PM   #6
BuckNaked2k BuckNaked2k is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
BuckNaked2k's Avatar
 
Feb 2010
Connecticut
32
761
47
146
Default

Should I buy this? I don't know. I got the UK SteeelBoook!

  Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2022, 12:42 PM   #7
Waldorf Waldorf is offline
Active Member
 
Oct 2018
Default

I watched the Criterion last night and it's definitely not a new ground up restoration from the camera negative. Some of the optical inserts are a bit rough looking and there are fluctuations in a few shots - overall it's a bit soft looking and there are some minor compression artifacts. It would make sense that it's the old version with some new extras (I only watched the Bryne and Turturro one which is OK).

So, yes, you will likely be 'upgrading' for the extras only.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Vincent Dawn (01-27-2022)
Old 01-24-2022, 02:52 PM   #8
jkoffman jkoffman is offline
Banned
 
Oct 2015
U.S.
363
4990
660
86
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Waldorf View Post
I watched the Criterion last night and it's definitely not a new ground up restoration from the camera negative. Some of the optical inserts are a bit rough looking and there are fluctuations in a few shots - overall it's a bit soft looking and there are some minor compression artifacts. It would make sense that it's the old version with some new extras (I only watched the Bryne and Turturro one which is OK).

So, yes, you will likely be 'upgrading' for the extras only.
Just the new 5.1 remix track as far as audio? How did it sound?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2022, 03:42 PM   #9
Waldorf Waldorf is offline
Active Member
 
Oct 2018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jkoffman View Post
Just the new 5.1 remix track as far as audio? How did it sound?
Sounded fine but I'm not sure it's really new - the specs of the old disc list 5.1 DTS_HD Master Audio as well and I no longer have the old disc to compare.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2022, 04:04 PM   #10
jkoffman jkoffman is offline
Banned
 
Oct 2015
U.S.
363
4990
660
86
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Waldorf View Post
Sounded fine but I'm not sure it's really new - the specs of the old disc list 5.1 DTS_HD Master Audio as well and I no longer have the old disc to compare.
I'm assuming you have a preview copy to review it? Maybe the back of the case or the booklet clarifies this info from Criterion:
Quote:
2K digital restoration, approved by director of photography Barry Sonnenfeld and filmmakers Joel and Ethan Coen, with new 5.1 surround soundtrack mix presented in DTS-HD Master Audio
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2022, 01:40 PM   #11
Waldorf Waldorf is offline
Active Member
 
Oct 2018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jkoffman View Post
I'm assuming you have a preview copy to review it? Maybe the back of the case or the booklet clarifies this info from Criterion:
I just borrowed the disc. Distributors like Alliance have had it in stock for weeks now.

The music cue is present during 'What heart?' if that clarifies things.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
jkoffman (01-26-2022), WaverBoy (02-05-2022)
Old 01-26-2022, 03:17 AM   #12
chrisandy007 chrisandy007 is offline
Active Member
 
Nov 2020
110
140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Waldorf View Post
I watched the Criterion last night and it's definitely not a new ground up restoration from the camera negative. Some of the optical inserts are a bit rough looking and there are fluctuations in a few shots - overall it's a bit soft looking and there are some minor compression artifacts. It would make sense that it's the old version with some new extras (I only watched the Bryne and Turturro one which is OK).

So, yes, you will likely be 'upgrading' for the extras only.
Sigh.. that's disappointing. Thanks for the info.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2022, 03:44 AM   #13
Matt89 Matt89 is online now
Blu-ray Knight
 
Matt89's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Toronto
337
362
48
2
Default

I mean, are we surprised that this isn't a new scan? It was never advertised as being one in the first place. Both the official announcement and Criterion's website say "2K digital restoration". It's a shame, but there was no indication that it was ever going to be a new scan.

I'm curious to see how Written on the Wind looks, as that's supposed to be a "NEW 2K digital restoration".

~Matt
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2022, 03:49 AM   #14
chrisandy007 chrisandy007 is offline
Active Member
 
Nov 2020
110
140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt89 View Post
I mean, are we surprised that this isn't a new scan? It was never advertised as being one in the first place. Both the official announcement and Criterion's website say "2K digital restoration". It's a shame, but there was no indication that it was ever going to be a new scan.

I'm curious to see how Written on the Wind looks, as that's supposed to be a "NEW 2K digital restoration".

~Matt
That's a good point regarding the semantics. I already own the Fox Blu but hearing it's basically a mirror release with new extras makes me reticent. I was hoping for... more, I guess?

I know the Coens don't care for HDR so perhaps Criterion decided no point doing a 4K scan and just release what was already there.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Matt89 (01-26-2022)
Old 01-26-2022, 03:52 AM   #15
drb124 drb124 is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
drb124's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
US
3
-
-
-
-
-
4
402
Default

Well that is disappointing. I may just keep the Fox release.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
chrisandy007 (01-26-2022)
Old 01-26-2022, 04:07 AM   #16
Matt89 Matt89 is online now
Blu-ray Knight
 
Matt89's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Toronto
337
362
48
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drb124 View Post
Well that is disappointing. I may just keep the Fox release.
Tbh it'll probably have the better compression anyway lol.

~Matt
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2022, 01:11 AM   #17
mattaaron2112 mattaaron2112 is offline
Active Member
 
mattaaron2112's Avatar
 
Oct 2016
IA
1025
1230
1140
1900
6
Default

My copy from Best Buy shipped yesterday, looks like it will arrive tomorrow. Like everyone else, I'm not expecting it to look any better than the old disc. But the extras will hopefully be worth the double dip. And I'm curious about whether they've actually fixed the 5.1 (I doubt it).
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2022, 03:58 AM   #18
chewbabka chewbabka is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
Mar 2017
316
678
34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattaaron2112 View Post
My copy from Best Buy shipped yesterday, looks like it will arrive tomorrow. Like everyone else, I'm not expecting it to look any better than the old disc. But the extras will hopefully be worth the double dip. And I'm curious about whether they've actually fixed the 5.1 (I doubt it).
They did:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Waldorf View Post
I just borrowed the disc. Distributors like Alliance have had it in stock for weeks now.

The music cue is present during 'What heart?' if that clarifies things.
I’ll be happy to stick with the old disc with the 4.0 track though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2022, 05:16 AM   #19
chrisandy007 chrisandy007 is offline
Active Member
 
Nov 2020
110
140
Default

Is there a consensus on this disc yet or too early? Seems like it won’t be worth the double dip from Fox Blu from what I gather..
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2022, 05:29 AM   #20
MassiveMovieBuff MassiveMovieBuff is offline
Blu-ray Count
 
MassiveMovieBuff's Avatar
 
Apr 2014
411
1629
97
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisandy007 View Post
Is there a consensus on this disc yet or too early? Seems like it won’t be worth the double dip from Fox Blu from what I gather..
Same here. I canceled my order until comparison caps are posted.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
chrisandy007 (02-05-2022)
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:49 PM.