|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() £29.99 | ![]() £19.99 1 day ago
| ![]() £22.73 9 hrs ago
| ![]() £19.99 | ![]() £10.99 21 hrs ago
| ![]() £16.99 | ![]() £25.99 | ![]() £14.99 | ![]() £16.99 | ![]() £44.99 | ![]() £36.99 | ![]() £29.99 18 hrs ago
|
![]() |
#41 |
Active Member
Nov 2023
|
![]()
Does anybody know if there will be a US release of this one, like there was with Ghostwatch?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
Did anyone else get this? I have the edition with the cassette, and it's really nice. Some of the tracks feature audio samples from the programme.
https://hiddenbritain.bandcamp.com/a...ectronic-means |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
It's called vidicon burn. The sensor in the camera would burn when exposed to bright light. In extreme cases, the spots would linger appearing on everything the tube captured. Some of it would dissipate over time, and sometimes they would burn in light evenly across the whole vidicon tube to cancel it- neither of which was possible while shooting.
Last edited by bigshot; 10-18-2024 at 04:59 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Member
|
![]()
Gonna pre-order it from Diabolik. I’d love it if someone, the BBC or the BFI or 101 or someone could ger ahold of Kneale’s “The Year of the Sex Olympics” to restore the surviving telerecording, perform color recovery (I can SEE the chroma-dot patterns in certain places), and VidFIRE it as well.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
Blu-ray Champion
Sep 2013
UK
|
![]()
From memory, YOTSO doesn't contain the dots in enough quality for colour recovery. Which is a massive shame, but it is what it is.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#47 | |
Blu-ray Champion
Jul 2012
The Arse of the World's Mind
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#48 | |
Blu-ray Champion
Jul 2012
The Arse of the World's Mind
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
Blu-ray Champion
Sep 2013
UK
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Grinnygog (10-30-2024), Mr. Thomsen (10-28-2024) |
![]() |
#51 |
Junior Member
Sep 2024
Doncaster
|
![]()
Definitely a great ghost story for Christmas with a very different depiction of a haunting. A curious upgrade to Blu ray, but I'm happy to support this release nevertheless.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Active Member
Oct 2019
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
Bottom line: whilst there's zero improvement in raw picture resolution when you put 625-line PAL video on Bluray compared to DVD, there is a modest improvement in picture quality (reduction in compression artefacts). And as the existing DVD releases were pretty bog standard transfers, there's also scope to apply PAL transform decoding, sensitively regrade a bit, and clean up the audio. Plus The Stone Tape is one of the best television programmes ever made, of course, so there is that ![]() EDIT: just to be clear - no, I don't believe there is *any* film on The Stone Tape, it was all shot on video in the BBC televsion studios (and also using Outside Broadcast video cameras for the few exterior shots). It would have been more usual for the Beeb to use 16mm film for location exteriors in those days, and the OB cameras were quite a novelty (and usually used for football matches!) so we might guess this was a deliberate artistic choice by the production team to avoid the Monty Python 'This House is Surrounded by Film' piebald aesthetic, and indeed something they probably had to get special dispensation for. Another driver for sticking to video in the studios would be that it made use of blue screen ('CSO') for a lot of the key visual effects shots involving ghosts, and CSO worked much better when all the elements were video: if you tried to composit on top of a film background, you'd usually get loads of film weave and jitter, which looked horribly wobbly even to a naive audience watching on a rickety 1970s television set. Last edited by LigandFields; 10-31-2024 at 03:29 PM. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Dickieduvet (12-07-2024), dvdjames (11-30-2024), Geoff D (12-09-2024), oddbox83 (10-31-2024), Sergeant Howie (11-04-2024) |
![]() |
#54 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Tchotchke (12-08-2024) |
![]() |
#55 |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | CouncilSpectre (12-06-2024), Dickieduvet (12-07-2024), Justin101 (12-06-2024), Tchotchke (12-08-2024), UnionJackMix (12-06-2024) |
![]() |
#57 |
Expert Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | everygrainofsand (08-08-2025) |
![]() |
#58 |
Active Member
|
![]()
I've looked at the letterboxd reviews for this, since I find that site to be a better barometer of what people online think about movies nowadays, and I've seen a few people there take umbrage with its portrayal of casual racism (the anti-japan stuff) & misogyny (how jane asher's character is treated).
I have a few points to make regarding that. firstly, I really wish more people online would understand that having deliberately unlikeable characters in your story is not a flaw. if you just want people to root for, go watch football. secondly, you're watching something produced over 50 years ago, when the standards of what was acceptable in mainstream entertainment were different. people, understandably so if you ask me, bristle at portrayals of discrimination a lot more now than they would have then. thirdly, I think it's made pretty clear by the ending where the story's sympathies lie. ultimately, when you watch a movie older than yourself through a modern lens, you're not going to see it the same way people at the time did, but I really wish more people had the media literacy to understand that portraying racism & misogyny in fiction is not even remotely the same thing as endorsing it |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | BobSimms (12-24-2024), daycity (12-12-2024), Eibon (12-06-2024), everygrainofsand (12-07-2024), grahams76 (12-09-2024), jacobvongunten (12-07-2024), MechaGodzilla (12-12-2024), nightowl80 (12-10-2024), pferreira (12-08-2024), Pluthero Quexos (12-10-2024), RossyG (12-15-2024), Rutger Lundgren (12-06-2024), ste71 (12-06-2024), Steedeel (12-08-2024), SVH (04-09-2025), theboyennis (12-09-2024), UnionJackMix (12-06-2024), wabrit (12-08-2024), WaverBoy (12-07-2024) |
![]() |
#59 |
Active Member
|
![]()
Funny thing about this is a lot of football players (either side of the Atlantic) are thoroughly unlikeable anyway but just play for your team!
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | MechaGodzilla (12-12-2024) |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|