|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $34.99 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.13 1 day ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $29.95 1 day ago
| ![]() $30.52 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $29.96 | ![]() $26.95 | ![]() $11.49 | ![]() $34.99 |
![]() |
#41 |
Banned
Nov 2023
California
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
I doubt this Imprint limited edition of 1500 copies will come down in price. (It’s currently $79.99 at diabolikDVD.) I love the movie, but I think, for the first time in my collecting career, I’m going to wait for the standard edition.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Blu-ray Guru
Jun 2011
Yorkshire
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 | |
Banned
Nov 2023
California
|
![]() Quote:
that was friggin hilarious, I was writing it and laughing and my co worker asked me what am I giggling about, and I said ''nothing just bullying some nerds'' I was a b*tch in high school and I am a b*tch now, tis what I do. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#48 | |
Blu-ray Guru
Jun 2011
Yorkshire
|
![]() Quote:
If you want to learn about projection in the UK at the time, there are several projectionists forums and groups out there. What I learned a few years ago from reading them was that UK cinemas were very 'careless' about masking flat widescreen films. Firstly, whilst there will undoubtedly have been at least some 1.66:1, 1.75:1 and 1.85:1 films projected, the majority of cinemas only had one mask (one size fits all), which they'd use for everything. Very few had separate masks and lenses for each. Secondly, it also needs to be remembered that, as the projectionist booth was almost always slightly above the screen's centre, the image cast would be a mild trapezoid. You wouldn't notice the slight distortion looking at the image itself, but would if you looked at the sides. The answer was simply to ensure all the edges were projected onto the sides, cropping a small amount. But the amount lost would be broadly similar to the difference between 1.66:1 and 1.75:1 or 1.75:1 and 1.85:1, and every director and DoP would be aware of that, certainly by the early '70s. Subsequently, these two facts suggest that the idea that a film was composed for 1.75:1 in any way which would make it artistically invalid at 1.66:1, is specious at best. Directors and DoPs would know that such 'accuracy' was absolutely impossible to attain in UK cinemas. |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|