As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
The Howling 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
3 hrs ago
The Bone Collector 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
11 hrs ago
Death Wish 3 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
13 hrs ago
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 day ago
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
18 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
Death Line 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
3 hrs ago
Spotlight 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
9 hrs ago
Signs 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.00
4 hrs ago
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)
$30.48
 
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.33
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-16-2008, 01:41 PM   #1
Deciazulado Deciazulado is offline
Site Manager
 
Deciazulado's Avatar
 
Aug 2006
USiberia
6
1159
7044
4040
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beast View Post
I only bought them the first time because I got it for a steal and there was no other option. This time I'm choosing to not give WB my money for an inferior product. Especially when we were told if they ever double-dipped on the season, we'd get the intended and preferred format. Warner Brothers failed to deliver, and I don't see why I should reward them for it. My DVD's are fine and they upconvert just fine as well.

Lamest answer ever. Congratulations. I'm gung-ho about the proper presentation of the series in it's intended aspect ratio. You know, the one that the creator intended. Why should I reward WB for giving me an inferior product. I wouldn't leave a generous tip for a mediocre meal. Maybe you like throwing money away.
But. What if the 1.33 master was made in 1080 x 1440 and the only way to present that in 1.78 was to crop it to 800 x 1440 and upscale it ("zoom" it up) to 1080 x 1920. Wouldn't that be in essence, what you'd be doing with the BD? Yes it would.

Unless the 1.33 master was made originally in 1440 x 1920 (2K) or higher, all 1.78 1080 versions would be zooms.

So before you start complaining they gave you a 1080 x 1440 master instead of a 1080 x 1920 master for this picture, first ask and find out if one even exists. Otherwise even if they remastered/reissued the picture in 1080 x 1920, all you'd get is h same thing you're getting now already zoomed for you.

So, you can zoom it now and have it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2008, 02:26 PM   #2
Darth Lavender Darth Lavender is offline
Active Member
 
Jul 2008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deciazulado View Post
But. What if the 1.33 master was made in 1080 x 1440 and the only way to present that in 1.78 was to crop it to 800 x 1440 and upscale it ("zoom" it up) to 1080 x 1920. Wouldn't that be in essence, what you'd be doing with the BD? Yes it would.

Unless the 1.33 master was made originally in 1440 x 1920 (2K) or higher, all 1.78 1080 versions would be zooms.

So before you start complaining they gave you a 1080 x 1440 master instead of a 1080 x 1920 master for this picture, first ask and find out if one even exists. Otherwise even if they remastered/reissued the picture in 1080 x 1920, all you'd get is h same thing you're getting now already zoomed for you.

So, you can zoom it now and have it.
I just opened the thread to post this very observation.
Given the slight 'jaggies' we already see on the blu-ray, one suspects that Warner might already be pushing the resolution a little too high (not sure when Justice League was created but, as mentioned elsewhere, Warner went through a stage were at least their 'High Definition' masters for DVD PAL, NTSC and later high definition broadcast weren't true 1080p, so it seems pretty plausible that at some stage the same sort of cost-cutting took place regarding animation)

The next question, of course, is why Warner didn't just create a new master (as they now do with Blu-Ray films) That sort of thing was done occasionally with older anime (the 80s "Urotsukidoji" movies were apparently 'refilmed' from the original drawings for release in America, and the same sort of thing happened with the restoration of 'Neon Genesis Evangelion')
In this case, it's probably a mix of two reasons...
- Warner feels it just isn't worth the cost/effort.
- As with pretty much all the more recent animation, Justice League may have been animated partly in the physical cells, and then partly within the computer. In which case, just 're-filming' the cells would leave you with a lot of stuff missing (depending on the animation style; certain backgrounds, possibly things like laser beams, certain lighting effects, etc.)
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2008, 02:45 PM   #3
Deciazulado Deciazulado is offline
Site Manager
 
Deciazulado's Avatar
 
Aug 2006
USiberia
6
1159
7044
4040
Default

Well I'm only speculating here, someone that's an expert on Warner animation must know more, about the particulars of each case, but in general and this goes for every TV program etc, if the elements were created or finalized at X resolutions and there's no higher resolution film negative involved, you can't create a "new" master, unless you mean do all the work again (make a new movie). If Warner animatiion was done all in film (and I mean specially in 35mm film but 16mm too) then a re-scan is possible, that's how you remaster movies. But if the "master" is not film, if the finished work is not film , it's "video" , it can't be re-scanned, it can only be scaled. That's why things like the SFX of Babylon 5 or Star Trek Next Generation or things shot live in NTSC like Saturday Night Live would have to be: scalings in any other video resolution that's not 480, and why you hear that to do B5 or Next Generation proper would mean $$$, the film parts could be scanned again, but the SFX would have to be started from scratch, and everything be re-edted toguether. If it's film it can be scanned at higher resolutions till its detail maxes out. Or if its CGI and you have the raw data for rendering it may be possible to re-render higher. But if not, it's just scaling.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2008, 02:57 PM   #4
Rob71 Rob71 is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
Rob71's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Florida
13
295
5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deciazulado View Post
That's why things like the SFX of Babylon 5 or Star Trek Next Generation or things shot live in NTSC like Saturday Night Live would have to be: scalings in any other video resolution that's not 480, and why you hear that to do B5 or Next Generation proper would mean $$$, the film parts could be scanned again, but the SFX would have to be started from scratch, and everything be re-edted toguether.
What a way to start my weekend. Babylon 5 is one of my favorite TV series and would love to see it on Blu-ray, but I doubt theres a big enough fanbase to warrant all the extra work. In their mind anyway.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2008, 04:42 PM   #5
Alan Gordon Alan Gordon is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Alan Gordon's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Dawson, GA
867
2455
437
1874
2065
4091
1896
44
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deciazulado View Post
But. What if the 1.33 master was made in 1080 x 1440 and the only way to present that in 1.78 was to crop it to 800 x 1440 and upscale it ("zoom" it up) to 1080 x 1920. Wouldn't that be in essence, what you'd be doing with the BD? Yes it would.

Unless the 1.33 master was made originally in 1440 x 1920 (2K) or higher, all 1.78 1080 versions would be zooms.

So before you start complaining they gave you a 1080 x 1440 master instead of a 1080 x 1920 master for this picture, first ask and find out if one even exists. Otherwise even if they remastered/reissued the picture in 1080 x 1920, all you'd get is h same thing you're getting now already zoomed for you.

So, you can zoom it now and have it.
If the creator of the show created the show in widescreen in anticipation of future HD broadcasts, SURELY he/they had the foresight to think about this.

Most likely, WB, who KNEW the fans wanted the widescreen version, STILL didn't see enough reason to go back to the matted versions.

~Alan
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2008, 09:50 PM   #6
QuasidodoJr QuasidodoJr is online now
Blu-ray Samurai
 
QuasidodoJr's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
Cincinnati, OH
614
1649
152
267
Send a message via AIM to QuasidodoJr
Default

Isn't this entire situation about not wanting to watch it with pillarboxes? I guess most of you will be skipping on The Adventures of Robin Hood and Casablanca as well, then.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2008, 10:09 PM   #7
Alan Gordon Alan Gordon is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Alan Gordon's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Dawson, GA
867
2455
437
1874
2065
4091
1896
44
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by QuasidodoJr View Post
Isn't this entire situation about not wanting to watch it with pillarboxes? I guess most of you will be skipping on The Adventures of Robin Hood and Casablanca as well, then.
I'll probably get "Casablanca" whenever I can get it for around $20. I'll probably end up getting "The Adventures Of Robin Hood" eventually. "Roman Holiday" (4x3) will be a D&D purchase when it's eventually released.

HUGE difference between those and "Justice League" since the movies mentioned above were NOT intended by the creators to be matted. "Justice League" S1 was CREATED to be matted as the creator wanted it widescreen due to the emergence of HDTV... and he PREFERS the look of the widescreen version. The 4x3 versions were only done as a compromise... which is why I feel this Blu-ray release is a COMPROMISED release.

Some of us WAITED to watch the widescreen versions on TV due to the preference, and in my case, watched it on a 50-inch SDTV with black bars on the tops and bottoms... so it's not really a case of "letterboxing" and "pillarboxing" for many of us, but rather the preference of the creator.

I never watched the 4x3 versions until the DVD came out, and I was HOPING to finally get the creator's vision on Blu-ray, but it appears I will have to hold out hope for an eventual double-dip.

~Alan
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2008, 12:03 AM   #8
Darth Lavender Darth Lavender is offline
Active Member
 
Jul 2008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Gordon View Post
If the creator of the show created the show in widescreen in anticipation of future HD broadcasts, SURELY he/they had the foresight to think about this.

Most likely, WB, who KNEW the fans wanted the widescreen version, STILL didn't see enough reason to go back to the matted versions.

~Alan
There's a very detailed webpage on the Babylon 5 issue that I might be able to find the link for later.

Basically, because of tv schedules, budgets, etc. They could only render the CGI scenes in 4:3 (would have taken too long/too expensive to render 16:9, especially considering that the show was being transmitted in just 4:3 at the time) The idea was to preserve the live-action scenes (filmed in Super 35) as High Definition (presumably 1080i or 1080p) and recreate the CGI scenes later.
Unfortunately, when the DVDs came out, all the computer-models, etc. had been deleted/lost, so they couldn't just 'rerender' the CGI in 16:9, and had to go back to the NTSC recordings used for original broadcast (cropping them to fit the live-action, 16:9, scenes)

As for those scenes that include both live-action and CGI, I haven't been able to find definitive information. But, given the intentions involved, I assume those are also stored in High Definition somewhere, without the CGI.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2008, 12:44 AM   #9
GGX GGX is offline
Banned
 
GGX's Avatar
 
Oct 2006
Kentwood, Michigan
262
2
Send a message via Yahoo to GGX
Default

I don't understand the purpose of this thread. The first season of Justice League has an OAR of 4:3.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2008, 03:06 PM   #10
Deciazulado Deciazulado is offline
Site Manager
 
Deciazulado's Avatar
 
Aug 2006
USiberia
6
1159
7044
4040
Default off topic babel post ;)

I'm sorry .

On the bright side, even if they only rescaled the SFX, if they do it properly this time, the SFX can look much better than they actually do on DVD right now. And maybe they'll go the Star Trek original series route one day and actually re-do the SFX . One can always hope.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2008, 02:50 AM   #11
Deciazulado Deciazulado is offline
Site Manager
 
Deciazulado's Avatar
 
Aug 2006
USiberia
6
1159
7044
4040
Default

So matte it. It's easy if you have a PS3, or a display/player with zoom function, or a projector with zoom lens or CIH setting.

Those without, can use the old black tape technique and sit closer. (I always watched the open matte Psycho video I had, in widescreen like that)

(Yes I know, it's a drag not the ideal situation. Better with a zoom. Not that I condone it. But it's lemonade )

Last edited by Deciazulado; 08-17-2008 at 03:24 AM. Reason: typo
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 09:31 AM   #12
Neil_Luv's_BLU Neil_Luv's_BLU is offline
Special Member
 
Neil_Luv's_BLU's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
Berkshire, England
149
Question Anyone bought Justice League Season 1?

Just wanted to know if anyone had bought it and what your opinion was of the set, PQ, AQ, extras... all that jazz.

I've just purchased it from a guy on ebay who I buy a lot of region free imported Blu-rays from.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 09:34 AM   #13
kevin2323 kevin2323 is offline
Active Member
 
May 2008
Default

just got it in the mail Ill let you know when I see it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 09:39 AM   #14
Neil_Luv's_BLU Neil_Luv's_BLU is offline
Special Member
 
Neil_Luv's_BLU's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
Berkshire, England
149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin2323 View Post
just got it in the mail Ill let you know when I see it.
Great

Thanks kevin
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 09:51 AM   #15
MOONPHASE MOONPHASE is offline
Blu-ray Duke
 
MOONPHASE's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
California
8
520
820
18
29
Default

im not expecting to much from the audio since its not in lossless audio even though there are some good 5.1 dolby movies but i rather have it in at least dolby truehd. i would be more concerned with the pq
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 09:55 AM   #16
kevin2323 kevin2323 is offline
Active Member
 
May 2008
Default

pq is GREAT!.....AUDIO is good not great.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2008, 05:26 PM   #17
Boa Vista Boa Vista is offline
Banned
 
Boa Vista's Avatar
 
Aug 2008
Default

I am going to buy it after work and watch it all rest of the evening!

Time for me to go back to work! G'day everyone
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 05:02 PM   #18
Jimmy Smith Jimmy Smith is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
May 2008
17
Default

Picture quality is great. Say what you want about the 4:3 aspect (which as I have said I have absolutly no problem with as this preserves the original animation and often in action sequences the whole 4:3 frame is often used) the colors have a level of clarity I didn't think these episodes were capable of. There are some minor flaws such as jaggies but I think these are likely flaws in the original animation not the transfers. Television 2D animation ain't gonna be high def demo material no matter what. Still I can't think of these episodes looking better.

Audio on the other hand is dissipointing. Quality is definutly better then the 2.0 tracks on the DVDs but next to most modern theatrically released Blu-Rays they fall flat. My back speakers rarely are ever used. With 3 discs to work with would it have been so hard to include TrueHD and to remix the soundtracks. These don't sound bad just not up to a high Blu-Ray standard.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2011, 03:38 AM   #19
kevink71 kevink71 is offline
New Member
 
kevink71's Avatar
 
Jul 2011
Chicago
Default Superfriends

Does anyone know if they are going to restore the old Superfriends cartoons and convert them on to Blu-Ray?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2011, 03:47 AM   #20
DaveFi DaveFi is offline
Special Member
 
Nov 2006
362
4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevink71 View Post
Does anyone know if they are going to restore the old Superfriends cartoons and convert them on to Blu-Ray?
It's pretty much a definite no on that. We'll be lucky just to get all seasons of JL/JLU on Blu.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Justice League Season 1 video issue Blu-ray Movies - North America zeze 0 12-19-2009 12:21 AM
justice league season 2? Wish Lists blulsu 2 05-20-2009 04:21 AM
Justice League Blu-ray Movies - International simon1976uk 5 04-22-2008 03:45 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:19 PM.