Madame Web (2024)

[snipemonkey]

Holy sh*t the reviews for this are brutal.

[ctujackbauer]

This has a legitimate shot at joining and staying in the bottom 100 at IMDB.

[rsp_clark]

I saw this because there was nothing else to see and thought it was okay. Not something I am going to see again, but definetly not the disaster people are saying it is. (Now, "Morbius", that was a true disaster!)

[drb999]

Venom = good, Venom 2 = garbage, Morbius = good. Madame Web probably not good. Kraven = ?

[mwynn]

Originally Posted by drb999

Venom = good, Venom 2 = garbage, Morbius = good. Madame Web probably not good. Kraven = ?

I think they have the Silk movie on the schedule. No idea why they just did not go all in on Ghost Spider.

[HenryNOTCavill]

Originally Posted by Blu Myers

Why does this keep happening? Can studios finally figure out that you can't just put characters in tights and expect the audience to forgive you?

To be blunt, Madame Web is lifeless, with absolutely zero depth of any character. It feels like a tax write-off. There's no heart or ambition in the performances. The villain Ezekiel is probably the worst part of the movie. A robot could have given a better performance.

This movie is shockingly bad. Webbin' time!!

1.5/5

I’d be scared to see a robot give a better performance!

[Joey9775]

Originally Posted by ben6543

I think someone today on X said it best which was also kinda funny. Marvel knew how bad Madame Web was gonna be that's why they released the Deadpool 3 teaser FF4 cast announcement and the X-men97 trailer so close together.

Yknow I can believe that. It changed the narrative damn quick.

[drb999]

Originally Posted by mwynn

I think they have the Silk movie on the schedule. No idea why they just did not go all in on Ghost Spider.

It’s a streaming series

https://deadline.com/2022/11/spider-...on-1235175212/

[Chedwiggen]

Said it before and I'll say it again, Sony would be wise to drop these spin-offs and do a
Raimi Spider-Man 4 and Amazing Spider-Man 3.

[Mikezilla3k]

Originally Posted by drb999

Venom = good, Venom 2 = garbage, Morbius = good. Madame Web probably not good. Kraven = ?

Kraven does have a solid director at the helm plus the writers of The Equalizer and Iron Man. Got a better feeling about that.

Originally Posted by mwynn

I think they have the Silk movie on the schedule. No idea why they just did not go all in on Ghost Spider.

Silk is going to be a TV series. And to hell with Fraud Stacy lol. Nothing but a wattpad original made by Dan Slotto and actual harrassers.

[VictoryAtNight]

Madame Web has snagged at least a few moviegoers into spending their Valentine's Day in theaters – as told by the film's $6 million box office haul. Though it's impressive that Madame Web (with its abysmal critics scores and low audience scores) got that many people to spend their romantic holiday on it, it should be clear that this isn't a good sign for Sony's opening weekend box office. Paramount's Bob Marley: One Love more than doubled Madame Web's Valentine's Day haul, taking in $14 million.

Right now, it looks like Madame Web will be following Sony's other Spider-Man Universe spinoff Morbius (2022) in terms of box office performance. Morbius earned $5.7 million from Thursday night previews, and ultimately $39 million during its opening weekend.

https://comicbook.com/movies/news/ma...day-6-million/

[Gacivory]

Originally Posted by Chedwiggen

Said it before and I'll say it again, Sony would be wise to drop these spin-offs and do a
Raimi Spider-Man 4 and Amazing Spider-Man 3.

Does Raimi want to do a Spider-Man 4?

[eiknarf]

Originally Posted by Johnny Blu

If The Marvels didn't get a poll, then why should a mod add one here. Neither one would receive honest votes.

It’d be:

“This movie was not good. But it wasn’t terrible. 4 out of 5 stars”
-blu-ray.com poll

[Batman1980]

Wasn't good but not terrible is 3/5.

[filmbuffTX]

Originally Posted by mwynn

I doubt anyone asked.

None of the polls are honest. Which is why I only do yes or no options.

Why do you think that? They seem pretty honest to me. I always vote honestly. Sure you see a small few "1 star" and "5 star" votes that don't seem legit, but the vast majority seem like normal votes and reflect what you'd expect from that particular movie.

[drb999]

The thing with these polls is everone has a different way of rating movies. A 4 to some is a 3 or whatever. They’re very subjective.

[HenryNOTCavill]

Originally Posted by Chedwiggen

Said it before and I'll say it again, Sony would be wise to drop these spin-offs and do a
Raimi Spider-Man 4 and Amazing Spider-Man 3.

Everyone hated Spidey 3 and Garfield as Spiderman back in the day, so what's going to change now?

[Foggy]

My first half star film since The Bubble back in 2022.

[Mikezilla3k]

Originally Posted by HenryNOTCavill

Everyone hated Spidey 3 and Garfield as Spiderman back in the day, so what's going to change now?

Give 7 years or so, and people will do the same with this film.

"You know, I enjoyed Madame Web. IT'S A GOOD MOVIE WHY NO SEQUEL"

[Mandalorian]

Yes, the same people who like Madame Web now will repeat that notion in the future when it comes up in discussions. Because not everyone hated Spider-Man 3 or the Garfield films then either.