|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $39.99 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $37.99 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $10.49 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $32.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $32.99 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $30.72 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.49 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $36.69 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $72.99 22 hrs ago
| ![]() $32.99 | ![]() $79.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $38.02 14 hrs ago
|
![]() |
#62 | |
Blu-ray Archduke
|
![]() Quote:
For the purposes of the thread, however, I like the idea of deferring to the film noir classifications on sites like AMC Filmsite and Internet Movie Database, along with the classifications in the official reviews here on this site. Suddenly, Crashout, Plunder Road, White Heat, and others may not fall 100% into the parameters, but viewers are still on the right track. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#63 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
How do you guys feel about Pursued? It's on the list, but it's more of a hybrid Western/Noir, and I wasn't sure if it should be on there or not. The setting isn't noir per se, but the tone and structure is. Quite a few of these western/noir hybrids were made, another on BD being Ramrod.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#64 | ||
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
No, but you can order the Canadian import on the US Amazon site for under $15: link. Quote:
I'm personally in favor of casting a wider net when categorizing what is and isn't noir. For instance, there are bona fide classics of the genre like The Narrow Margin that have what some would call a happy ending, but that certainly shouldn't disqualify them from being classified as noir. A lot of great noirs have some of the major elements of the genre, but not all of them. Some might seem noirish or noir lite, but it doesn't mean they should be thrown out of the genre completely. I'm worried about this, too. I'm going to have to be disciplined and keep myself from spending all my time getting into these kind of debates. Last edited by noirjunkie; 01-23-2014 at 05:02 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#66 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
Debates are good, as long as they're healthy ones
![]() Now with regards to formating, I am a bit torn on whether to make a separate category for British noir, or just to keep them incorporated with the rest. Film noir is predominantly American, but that has to do more with styling than the actual country that produced it. So films like The Third Man, They Made me a Fugitive, Brighton Rock still fits the mold. Plus I'm not sure if there are even enough British noir titles to justify a separate category. The same thing with International titles like Rififi, Les Diaboliques, and High and Low. I'd say they're all noir, but they don't exactly have the typical structure, or tone that we associate with the category. As always, I'm completely open to discussion about all of this. I'll be working on adding some of the titles suggested soon, so if you see any other missing title that haven't been mentioned in the thread, please do so. Thanks ![]() Last edited by MifuneFan; 01-23-2014 at 05:32 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#67 |
Active Member
|
![]()
A couple of questions regarding classification that I've had for a while:
1. Where do folks draw the line in terms of production year for classic film noir and neo noir? 2 examples come to mind. Anatomy of a Murder (1959) and Blast of Silence (1960). Both are very late in the classic film noir cycle, but seem to have the elements of classic film noir. 2. How would you classify films like Chinatown and L.A. Confidential, which were produced way after classic film noir but are set in the classic era? |
![]() |
![]() |
#68 | ||
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() Quote:
The last paragraph from the wiki article on neo-noir sums it up some of my thoughts on the subject: Quote:
Last edited by MifuneFan; 01-23-2014 at 06:44 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#69 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
I guess the problem with defining neo-noirs (especially for this page) is that it gave a rise to it's own subgenres.
Such as: Tech-noir: [which includes films as Alien (1979), Blade Runner (1982), and The Terminator (1984)] Psycho-Noir: [which includes films as Se7en (1995), Mulholland Drive (2001), Fight Club (1999), and Memento (2000)] Science fiction noir: [which includes films as Alphaville (1965) and Soylent Green (1973)] So I guess for the purposes of this page, how are we defining neo-noirs? Because if we try to include everything that someone/studio/critic calls "neo-noir"...we're going to have a long list. Maybe because neo-noir is so subjective, we need to cite a real (perhaps academic?) source to why the film is a neo-noir (if it's not easily identifiable as one, such as Sin City or Brick). At least so there will be less debates over some "iffy" inclusions. Last edited by GoldMotel; 01-23-2014 at 06:34 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#70 | |
Blu-ray Archduke
|
![]() Quote:
MifuneFan's idea of filing such films under "Modern Noir" is a good idea. Last edited by The Great Owl; 01-23-2014 at 06:44 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#71 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#72 |
Member
|
![]()
Midnight Lace (1960) - Noir in color/Neo-noir? Unsure, but definitely feels like a film Hitchcock himself would've made.
British/French noirs: Gaslight (1940) It Always Rains on Sunday (1947) Le Trou (1960) - Similar to "Brute Force"? Neo-noirs: The Man Who Wasn't There (2001) Side Effects (2013) - Soderbergh's retiring? Trance (2013) Last edited by JB3Royce; 01-23-2014 at 07:45 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#73 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
Okay, I've come up with a compromise that I hope most parties will be satisfied with. Rather than make separate categories for the few British and other International Film noirs, I will designate these with a flag of their respective country next to the title. So all British Film noirs will get the Unionjack
![]() ![]() ![]() Initially these flags were to designate what country you could get the BD release from, but instead I will put that in parentheses after the title name. I like that way better too as it might seem confusing to see a title like Gilda with an Italian flag next to it. Let me know what you guys think Last edited by MifuneFan; 01-23-2014 at 08:13 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#74 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
Another film I don't think anyone has yet mentioned is Melville's TWO MEN IN MANHATTAN (1959), not exactly a textbook noir but certainly a loving homage to the style and some of the themes. It's almost a neo-noir before noir had quite died out yet. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#75 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#76 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#78 |
Power Member
|
![]()
To be clear, I certainly wasn't trying to start a fight, I had just never heard that and had always considered Odd Man Out and Rififi noirs and just wanted to hear the reasoning.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#79 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
2. Chinatown and L.A. Confidential are both neo-noirs due to a combination of their later production dates and the fact that they were shot in color. To be safe, I'd say anything post 1965 should be considered neo-noir. Last edited by noirjunkie; 01-23-2014 at 10:50 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#80 |
Member
|
![]()
Suggestions: the third man, white heat, panic in the streets, night of the hunter, sweet smell of success, and kiss me deadly. Also, I've always considered movies like fargo or down by law as noir because of the dark (noir) subject matter.
PS From here to eternity, eyes without a face, in cold blood, sunset blvd., sin city, and breathless. Last edited by moodyblus; 01-23-2014 at 11:01 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|