Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017) - Page 4 - Blu-ray Forum

Walts Ghost · 02-10-2015, 04:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diesel

Ding ding ding. When I was reading the release and coming to comment here I knew I'd already find a post from you seeing through the fluffy, press release wordings

This is almost exactly what we have been saying Sony should do for years and Feige/Iger clearly thought the same thing.

You know me too well.

Quote:

Originally Posted by walruswarrior

Do you really believe Sony would have allowed Marvel to buy the rights?

This was probably the best situation that was realistically possible.

I wouldn't quite call it a hostile takeover like Walt lol

I'm being dramatic.

But my point is basically, this wouldn't have happened if Marvel wasn't retaining a lot of the control. That press release is so full of fluff it's not even funny. Sony wants to look successful in all this, and Marvel just wants their character back. This was a win-win for both. It's good to see Sony Japan brought Marvel back to the table after Sony walked the first time.

Moviefan2k4 · 02-10-2015, 04:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diesel

Um?

The Dark World made nearly $700M worldwide and topped $200M domestically...it was quite a success.

On the surface, sure...but most attributed that to Tom Hiddleston returning as Loki. Malekith was the weakest villain after Trevor Slattery so far, and Natalie's performance seemed really empty compared to the first film.

Thomas Guycott · 02-10-2015, 04:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moviefan2k4

If that's true, then Feige shouldn't have lied about the control issue.

It's not lying, this is how PR between giant multinational corporations works.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moviefan2k4

On the surface, sure...but most attributed that to Tom Hiddleston returning as Loki. Malekith was the weakest villain after Trevor Slattery so far, and Natalie's performance seemed really empty compared to the first film.

So what, that's subjective. Money's money, very objective.

Moviefan2k4 · 02-10-2015, 04:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomas Guycott

It's not lying, this is how PR between giant multinational corporations works.

Lying is lying, period. If you say one company has the final say on a matter when the reverse is true, your claim is a deliberate falsehood.

jscoggins · 02-10-2015, 04:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moviefan2k4

Lying is lying, period. If you say one company has the final say on a matter when the reverse is true, your claim is a deliberate falsehood.

Jacob Anderson · 02-10-2015, 04:53 AM

So as of right now their movie schedule is the following correct?:

2016
May 06th Captain America: Civil War
Nov 04th Dr. Strange

2017
May 05th Guardians of the Galaxy 2
Jul 28th Spider-Man
Nov 03rd Thor: Ragnarok

2018
May 04th Avengers: Infinity War - Part 1
Jul 06th Black Panther
Nov 02nd Captain Marvel

2019
May 03rd Avengers: Infinity War - Part 2
Jul 12th InHumans

Diesel · 02-10-2015, 04:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jacob Anderson

So as of right now their movie schedule is the following correct?:

2016
May 06th Captain America: Civil War
Nov 04th Dr. Strange

2017
May 05th Guardians of the Galaxy 2
Jul 28th Spider-Man
Nov 03rd Thor: Ragnarok

2018
May 04th Avengers: Infinity War - Part 1
Jul 06th Black Panther
Nov 02nd Captain Marvel

2019
May 03rd Avengers: Infinity War - Part 2
Jul 12th InHumans

Indeed

HD Canuck · 02-10-2015, 05:00 AM

Kamelot · 02-10-2015, 05:02 AM

Great, Silver Surfer should be next.

Gigawing1 · 02-10-2015, 05:04 AM

Sorry, don't feel bad for Andrew Garfield one iota. After all, he did get Emma Stone out of the deal.

In all seriousness, I'm glad that Marvel has got control (mostly) of Spider-man back. Best case scenario would have seen Disney buy the rights back completely, as I don't want Sony involved at all (my opinion - all the Spidey movies have sucked @$$). However, this seems like the most realistic option available. Too bad the hackers didn't do more damage.......

Logan Lerman? No way. I liked him in 3:10 to Yuma, The Perks of Being a Wallflower, and Fury, but Peter Parker he is not.

Diesel · 02-10-2015, 05:06 AM

Zac Efron for Peter

Thomas Guycott · 02-10-2015, 05:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gigawing1

Logan Lerman? No way. I liked him in 3:10 to Yuma, The Perks of Being a Wallflower, and Fury, but Peter Parker he is not.

How about Donald Glover?

[Show spoiler]

HD Canuck · 02-10-2015, 05:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stvn1974

Now I am going to be greedy and expect an X-Men announcement.

+1

DisneyBlu · 02-10-2015, 05:07 AM

Thank you, Marvel, and thank you, Sony. Spider-Man is coming home. I'm excited!

AvengingCursader · 02-10-2015, 05:11 AM

Bring on good Spidey films again. The Original first 2 Sam Raimi films were Amazing. I hope now that Spider-Man is in the MCU the caliber of film will be just as good as Captain America, Iron Man & Thor.

MPeriolat · 02-10-2015, 05:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stvn1974

Now I am going to be greedy and expect an X-Men announcement.

Not happening, you will pry Logan, Xavier and the rest from Fox's cold dead hands.

Now, Fantastic Four on the other hand... well, to quote The Shawshank Redemption: "Geology is the study of pressure and time. Pressure and time."

StevenHarvey1990 · 02-10-2015, 05:12 AM

OMG!OMG!OMG!OMG!OMG!

YES!! It happened. I am SOOOO pumped now. Spidey and Hulk on the same screen. You can take your Batman and your Superman and... you know the rest.

Right, now North Korea need to go after Fox

Hackers Assemble!

motorheadache95 · 02-10-2015, 05:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moviefan2k4

I'd love that, but it would never work. The moment he showed up, fans would be crying for Tobey to walk through the door...and he's too old for Spidey now.

I think it'll work-- they had Judi Dench return as M in Casino Royale and nobody got confused about that. I was actually hoping they'd bring him back for the Amazing Spider-Man series anyway, since by movie three nobody could possibly have been confused with the continuity by then.

Adam_ME · 02-10-2015, 05:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gigawing1

Logan Lerman? No way. I liked him in 3:10 to Yuma, The Perks of Being a Wallflower, and Fury, but Peter Parker he is not.

I'm not sure about that casting either. He's kinda short. Then again, if he's gonna crossover into the other films, Lerman may be standing opposite Robert Downey Jr., Mark Ruffalo, and Jeremy Renner who are even smaller than he is.

Moviefan2k4 · 02-10-2015, 05:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MPeriolat

Not happening, you will pry Logan, Xavier and the rest from Fox's cold dead hands.

Now, Fantastic Four on the other hand... well, to quote The Shawshank Redemption: "Geology is the study of pressure and time. Pressure and time."

I'm all for the X-Men remaining with Fox; the Donners have had a pretty good track record all-around with those movies.

As for the other matter...well, I think everyone here probably knows my stance by now.

View Poll Results: Rate the movie (after you have seen it!)
	7	1.42%
	28	5.69%
	67	13.62%
	219	44.51%
	171	34.76%
Voters: 492. You may not vote on this poll

02-10-2015, 04:53 AM	#66
Jacob Anderson Blu-ray Guru Member since:Feb 2013 Location:Janesville, WI Blu-ray collection:898 DVD collection:200 Trading Score:75	So as of right now their movie schedule is the following correct?: 2016 May 06th Captain America: Civil War Nov 04th Dr. Strange 2017 May 05th Guardians of the Galaxy 2 Jul 28th Spider-Man Nov 03rd Thor: Ragnarok 2018 May 04th Avengers: Infinity War - Part 1 Jul 06th Black Panther Nov 02nd Captain Marvel 2019 May 03rd Avengers: Infinity War - Part 2 Jul 12th InHumans

02-10-2015, 05:00 AM	#68
HD Canuck Blu-ray Samurai Member since:Sep 2011 Location:Calgary, AB, Canada 4K collection:122 Blu-ray collection:1486 DVD collection:219 Digital collection:1543 iTunes collection:398 Blu-ray reviews:1

02-10-2015, 05:02 AM	#69
Kamelot Senior Member Member since:Mar 2012 Location:VA	Great, Silver Surfer should be next.

02-10-2015, 05:04 AM	#70
Gigawing1 Active Member Member since:Feb 2014	Sorry, don't feel bad for Andrew Garfield one iota. After all, he did get Emma Stone out of the deal. In all seriousness, I'm glad that Marvel has got control (mostly) of Spider-man back. Best case scenario would have seen Disney buy the rights back completely, as I don't want Sony involved at all (my opinion - all the Spidey movies have sucked @$$). However, this seems like the most realistic option available. Too bad the hackers didn't do more damage....... Logan Lerman? No way. I liked him in 3:10 to Yuma, The Perks of Being a Wallflower, and Fury, but Peter Parker he is not.

02-10-2015, 05:06 AM	#71
Diesel Blu-ray Archduke Top contributor Member since:Jan 2009 4K collection:- Blu-ray collection:- DVD collection:- Digital collection:- Blu-ray reviews: 31 Trading Score:10	Zac Efron for Peter

02-10-2015, 05:07 AM	#74
DisneyBlu Blu-ray Samurai Member since:Mar 2011 Blu-ray reviews:4 Trading Score:212	Thank you, Marvel, and thank you, Sony. Spider-Man is coming home. I'm excited!

02-10-2015, 05:11 AM	#75
AvengingCursader Member Member since:Feb 2015	Bring on good Spidey films again. The Original first 2 Sam Raimi films were Amazing. I hope now that Spider-Man is in the MCU the caliber of film will be just as good as Captain America, Iron Man & Thor.

02-10-2015, 05:12 AM	#77
StevenHarvey1990 Power Member Member since:Oct 2012 Blu-ray collection:178	OMG!OMG!OMG!OMG!OMG! YES!! It happened. I am SOOOO pumped now. Spidey and Hulk on the same screen. You can take your Batman and your Superman and... you know the rest. Right, now North Korea need to go after Fox Hackers Assemble!

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals