|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $49.99 | ![]() $36.69 | ![]() $22.49 1 hr ago
| ![]() $29.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.96 23 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.96 | ![]() $31.99 | ![]() $44.73 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $86.13 1 day ago
| ![]() $96.99 | ![]() $39.99 | ![]() $29.96 1 day ago
|
![]() |
#81 |
Power Member
|
![]()
That is SO lame. What’s the point in even releasing on 4K UHD if the transfer isnt going to be native 4K?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#82 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
Not too bad for a ~$5 premium, if you ask me. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | aetherhole (03-15-2018), AKORIS (03-15-2018), Brandon B (03-14-2018), cynatnite (03-14-2018), Dailyan (03-14-2018), Dubstar (03-14-2018), EbonDragon (03-14-2018), flyry (03-14-2018), Geoff D (03-14-2018), gkolb (03-14-2018), legends of beyond (03-14-2018), MattPerdue (03-14-2018), ncraft (03-15-2018), NoFro (03-14-2018), OutOfBoose (03-14-2018), ray0414 (03-14-2018), ryantoyota (05-12-2018), Sky_Captain (03-14-2018), Staying Salty (03-15-2018), s_har (03-15-2018), tonylopez (03-14-2018), Wing Wang17 (03-15-2018) |
![]() |
#83 |
Power Member
|
![]()
But still, you may as well just stick with your 2K BDs. They’re both wasting money and time putting an inferior (in 2018 standards) 2K transfer on a 4K BD and calling it 4K. If you’re gonna realease your feature in 4K, it’s best to not half-ass it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#84 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
Only if you want inferior image quality.
It’s a 2K movie and they’re putting it on UHD with very little visual compromise. The Pixar UHDs released so far (Cars 3 and Coco) are at least three-quarter-assed. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | EbonDragon (03-14-2018), Geoff D (03-14-2018), gkolb (03-14-2018), legends of beyond (03-14-2018), NoFro (03-14-2018), OutOfBoose (03-14-2018), ray0414 (03-14-2018), ryantoyota (05-12-2018), stigdu (03-14-2018) |
![]() |
#87 |
Power Member
|
![]()
Its not about 2K upscale is inferior or anything most of the 2k upscales proved otherwise..but pixar dropping the ball for monitory reasons is not right.I am not expert on costs involved but these pixar movies are universally loved and will sell good.I'm sure 4K rendering would have looked magnificent and future proof for next format.
At least I am glad we are finally seeing catalog titles from Disney/Pixar. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Doctorossi (03-14-2018) |
![]() |
#89 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#90 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
I dunno about "10s of millions" but I agree in principal with that, I'm not sure where it even said that money was at the root of the decision anyway, apart from people with their "I'm with cynical" hats on. The director literally said "We’ve done tests and don’t see enough of a visual benefit to render at 4K", I don't know how that could be any clearer.
It's not that 4K doesn't give you some added juice, it's how much juice it truly adds vs the time it takes to turn it around, plus other concerns like the loss of spatial resolution that is incurred should they want to "dirty up" the image - designing the 'photography' to match real-world lenses and stops as they did - as well as the temporal resolution that goes out the window whenever things start moving, 24fps being what it is. There's a reason why 4K VFX is still very rare for feature films, but even on some that had it e.g. Tomorrowland they dropped in 2K VFX for shots that lose so much temporal detail anyway that the viewer would never notice. |
![]() |
![]() |
#91 |
Power Member
|
![]()
Whatever.
When you buy 4K with your hard-earned money, don't you expect to be given 4K? As a common buyer, I do. I was sorely disappointed w/ Terminator 2's 4K transfer. I'm baffled by those who complain about the Back to the Future trilogy BDs receiving what they deem to be inferior transfers, but are perfectly okay with movies on a 4K physical format not having native 4K transfers. Seems like a double standard to me. Blu-ray: "The Look and Sound of PERFECT". Whatever happened to that? |
![]() |
![]() |
#92 |
Power Member
|
![]()
Personally I'd like to as well. I'd like to upgrade all my Pixar discs to 4K. Pixar is making it hard for me and others with the same goal to justify doing so when they half-ass their product like this. A 2K scan with all the technological bells and whistles is not the same as a TRUE 4K scan, and people here know it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#93 | |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() Quote:
T2 is a piss-poor UHD but ironically enough that one WAS from a 4K remaster. Double heh. All them K's mean jack shit if the people pulling the strings are asleep at the wheel, yes I'm mixing my metaphors but I'm a rebel, see. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: |
![]() |
#94 |
Banned
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#95 | |
Active Member
|
![]()
It's true that a 4K render may not cost 10's of millions for The Incredibles (though it likely would for any modern Pixar film!), but the point is it would still cost more than it would earn, barring a theatrical re-release. And honestly, I'm not too sure that there's that much detail in the texturing in a CG movie from 2004.
Quote:
Secondly, T2 is actually a true 4K scan, as mentioned earlier. The majority of 2K upscales look better than it. Thirdly, as a buyer I expect to be given the best presentation possible. Regardless of an upscale or not, UHD's (as mentioned in practically every other post on this forum) generally still have HDR, WCG, 10bit, better compression, immersive audio, and even at 2K still have an increase in detail. And if we're being really pedantic you aren't being gyped by the studio because the container of the disc is 4K, no matter what is in it. But regardless of all that - I love the movie as an art form. I'll always pay top dollar to have my favorite movies in the absolute best presentation possible no matter what it is. And as to your last point, that's just a marketing slogan. Not all blu-rays are perfect. Would you go to McDonalds and sue them if you don't love it? I hope this doesn't sound too confrontational. Don't get me wrong, I would love a true 4K render but it's just not feasible for the producers and it's most likely never gonna happen so why not get the next best thing? I would LOVE to get Apocalypto but I'd be honestly surprised if we ever see it on the format. ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by newtonp01; 03-15-2018 at 12:48 AM. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | ryantoyota (05-12-2018) |
![]() |
#96 |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]()
Nah, I Buy UHDs because they look better than the bluray.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#97 |
Active Member
|
![]()
Most people don't know what a digital intermediate is, so Disney wouldn't be able to sell more copies based on that fact alone. Makes sense for them to use the 2k. I will be buying this because I still haven't got the Blu-ray for this one. Hope we get a steelbook!
|
![]() |
![]() |
#98 | ||||
Special Member
|
![]()
Still my all-time favorite animated movie also.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
me too Last edited by benji888578; 03-15-2018 at 02:49 AM. |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
#99 |
Expert Member
|
![]()
Even if there are now clear visual benefits to 4k re-render Disney could always put a marketing blurb on the cover saying "All new re-mastered in 4k for the best viewing experience!"
It's Disney and if anyone can make such an endeavour financially worthwhile it'd be Disney as they seem to be good at getting top dollar for catalog animated films. The Incredibles probably has a far smaller market among new buyers than it would to double-dippers so marketing matters more in getting people to buy than the mere existence of the film would. I'm not going to sweat it, myself. But how Disney handles this release is a signal to how they might handle future releases. |
![]() |
![]() |
#100 | |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Dubstar; 03-15-2018 at 04:26 AM. |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|