As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best 4K Blu-ray Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Hard Boiled 4K (Blu-ray)
$49.99
 
In the Mouth of Madness 4K (Blu-ray)
$36.69
 
Shane 4K (Blu-ray)
$22.49
1 hr ago
Casino 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.99
1 day ago
Back to the Future 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
23 hrs ago
Shin Godzilla 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.96
 
Spawn 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.99
 
The Mask 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.73
10 hrs ago
Airport: The Complete Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$86.13
1 day ago
A Nightmare on Elm Street Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$96.99
 
I Know What You Did Last Summer 4K (Blu-ray)
$39.99
 
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
1 day ago
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > 4K Ultra HD > 4K Blu-ray and 4K Movies
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-14-2018, 02:07 AM   #81
The Edge The Edge is offline
Power Member
 
The Edge's Avatar
 
Oct 2012
Wilmington, California
340
692
87
2
8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctorossi View Post
It's 2K and it will be on this disc, too. Pixar has indicated that they tested re-rendering at 4K for UHD releases and decided that the cost/benefit wasn't there, so they'll be sticking with 2K for their UHDs for the foreseeable future.
That is SO lame. What’s the point in even releasing on 4K UHD if the transfer isnt going to be native 4K?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2018, 02:14 AM   #82
Doctorossi Doctorossi is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
Doctorossi's Avatar
 
Feb 2009
134
478
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Edge View Post
What’s the point in even releasing on 4K UHD if the transfer isnt going to be native 4K?
Higher bandwidth, high dynamic range, more efficient compression, wide color gamut, increased chromatic resolution and professional scaling.

Not too bad for a ~$5 premium, if you ask me.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
aetherhole (03-15-2018), AKORIS (03-15-2018), Brandon B (03-14-2018), cynatnite (03-14-2018), Dailyan (03-14-2018), Dubstar (03-14-2018), EbonDragon (03-14-2018), flyry (03-14-2018), Geoff D (03-14-2018), gkolb (03-14-2018), legends of beyond (03-14-2018), MattPerdue (03-14-2018), ncraft (03-15-2018), NoFro (03-14-2018), OutOfBoose (03-14-2018), ray0414 (03-14-2018), ryantoyota (05-12-2018), Sky_Captain (03-14-2018), Staying Salty (03-15-2018), s_har (03-15-2018), tonylopez (03-14-2018), Wing Wang17 (03-15-2018)
Old 03-14-2018, 02:26 AM   #83
The Edge The Edge is offline
Power Member
 
The Edge's Avatar
 
Oct 2012
Wilmington, California
340
692
87
2
8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctorossi View Post
Higher bandwidth, high dynamic range, more efficient compression, wide color gamut, increased chromatic resolution and professional scaling.

Not too bad for a ~$5 premium, if you ask me.
But still, you may as well just stick with your 2K BDs. They’re both wasting money and time putting an inferior (in 2018 standards) 2K transfer on a 4K BD and calling it 4K. If you’re gonna realease your feature in 4K, it’s best to not half-ass it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2018, 03:31 AM   #84
Doctorossi Doctorossi is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
Doctorossi's Avatar
 
Feb 2009
134
478
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Edge View Post
But still, you may as well just stick with your 2K BDs.
Only if you want inferior image quality.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Edge View Post
They’re both wasting money and time putting an inferior (in 2018 standards) 2K transfer on a 4K BD and calling it 4K. If you’re gonna realease your feature in 4K, it’s best to not half-ass it.
It’s a 2K movie and they’re putting it on UHD with very little visual compromise. The Pixar UHDs released so far (Cars 3 and Coco) are at least three-quarter-assed.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
EbonDragon (03-14-2018), Geoff D (03-14-2018), gkolb (03-14-2018), legends of beyond (03-14-2018), NoFro (03-14-2018), OutOfBoose (03-14-2018), ray0414 (03-14-2018), ryantoyota (05-12-2018), stigdu (03-14-2018)
Old 03-14-2018, 01:20 PM   #85
Dailyan Dailyan is online now
Blu-ray Baron
 
Dailyan's Avatar
 
Feb 2015
Beyond the Blue Horizon
198
2251
197
58
56
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Edge View Post
That is SO lame. What’s the point in even releasing on 4K UHD if the transfer isnt going to be native 4K?
Don’t buy it. Pure and easy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2018, 01:23 PM   #86
Geoff D Geoff D is offline
Blu-ray Emperor
 
Geoff D's Avatar
 
Feb 2009
Swanage, Engerland
1348
2525
6
33
Default

We've got another one!
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Dailyan (03-14-2018), Fat Phil (03-14-2018), guachi (03-15-2018), NoFro (03-14-2018), Sky_Captain (03-14-2018)
Old 03-14-2018, 03:14 PM   #87
idlebrain idlebrain is offline
Power Member
 
idlebrain's Avatar
 
Nov 2009
Atlanta, GA
7
590
1471
68
Default

Its not about 2K upscale is inferior or anything most of the 2k upscales proved otherwise..but pixar dropping the ball for monitory reasons is not right.I am not expert on costs involved but these pixar movies are universally loved and will sell good.I'm sure 4K rendering would have looked magnificent and future proof for next format.
At least I am glad we are finally seeing catalog titles from Disney/Pixar.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Doctorossi (03-14-2018)
Old 03-14-2018, 07:43 PM   #88
Cobolisdead Cobolisdead is offline
Special Member
 
Cobolisdead's Avatar
 
Jan 2013
68
887
3
8
Default

I can't wait for this film to come out in 4K! Definitely a day 1 UHD pick up for me!
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2018, 08:49 PM   #89
newtonp01 newtonp01 is offline
Active Member
 
Jun 2016
753
1783
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by idlebrain View Post
Its not about 2K upscale is inferior or anything most of the 2k upscales proved otherwise..but pixar dropping the ball for monitory reasons is not right.I am not expert on costs involved but these pixar movies are universally loved and will sell good.I'm sure 4K rendering would have looked magnificent and future proof for next format.
True...but I'm also pretty sure if you were the head of Pixar you also wouldn't spend 10s of millions on native 4K rendering to get maybe 1/10th of that back, if you're lucky.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Geoff D (03-14-2018), gkolb (03-14-2018)
Old 03-14-2018, 09:11 PM   #90
Geoff D Geoff D is offline
Blu-ray Emperor
 
Geoff D's Avatar
 
Feb 2009
Swanage, Engerland
1348
2525
6
33
Default

I dunno about "10s of millions" but I agree in principal with that, I'm not sure where it even said that money was at the root of the decision anyway, apart from people with their "I'm with cynical" hats on. The director literally said "We’ve done tests and don’t see enough of a visual benefit to render at 4K", I don't know how that could be any clearer.

It's not that 4K doesn't give you some added juice, it's how much juice it truly adds vs the time it takes to turn it around, plus other concerns like the loss of spatial resolution that is incurred should they want to "dirty up" the image - designing the 'photography' to match real-world lenses and stops as they did - as well as the temporal resolution that goes out the window whenever things start moving, 24fps being what it is.

There's a reason why 4K VFX is still very rare for feature films, but even on some that had it e.g. Tomorrowland they dropped in 2K VFX for shots that lose so much temporal detail anyway that the viewer would never notice.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2018, 11:45 PM   #91
The Edge The Edge is offline
Power Member
 
The Edge's Avatar
 
Oct 2012
Wilmington, California
340
692
87
2
8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff D View Post
We've got another one!
Whatever.

When you buy 4K with your hard-earned money, don't you expect to be given 4K?

As a common buyer, I do.

I was sorely disappointed w/ Terminator 2's 4K transfer. I'm baffled by those who complain about the Back to the Future trilogy BDs receiving what they deem to be inferior transfers, but are perfectly okay with movies on a 4K physical format not having native 4K transfers. Seems like a double standard to me.

Blu-ray: "The Look and Sound of PERFECT".

Whatever happened to that?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2018, 11:52 PM   #92
The Edge The Edge is offline
Power Member
 
The Edge's Avatar
 
Oct 2012
Wilmington, California
340
692
87
2
8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToEhrIsHuman View Post
Personally I'd like to finally have 'The Incredibles' in 3D
Personally I'd like to as well. I'd like to upgrade all my Pixar discs to 4K. Pixar is making it hard for me and others with the same goal to justify doing so when they half-ass their product like this. A 2K scan with all the technological bells and whistles is not the same as a TRUE 4K scan, and people here know it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2018, 11:53 PM   #93
Geoff D Geoff D is offline
Blu-ray Emperor
 
Geoff D's Avatar
 
Feb 2009
Swanage, Engerland
1348
2525
6
33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Edge View Post
Whatever.

When you buy 4K with your hard-earned money, don't you expect to be given 4K?

As a common buyer, I do.

I was sorely disappointed w/ Terminator 2's 4K transfer. I'm baffled by those who complain about the Back to the Future trilogy BDs receiving what they deem to be inferior transfers, but are perfectly okay with movies on a 4K physical format not having native 4K transfers. Seems like a double standard to me.

Blu-ray: "The Look and Sound of PERFECT".

Whatever happened to that?
Universal were the ones who touted that piece of marketing spiel, and look what happened to most of their catalogue BDs, BTTF included. Heh.

T2 is a piss-poor UHD but ironically enough that one WAS from a 4K remaster. Double heh.

All them K's mean jack shit if the people pulling the strings are asleep at the wheel, yes I'm mixing my metaphors but I'm a rebel, see.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
aetherhole (03-15-2018), Alex82 (03-15-2018), J-Mart (03-15-2018), The Edge (03-16-2018)
Old 03-15-2018, 12:18 AM   #94
PeterTHX PeterTHX is offline
Banned
 
PeterTHX's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
563
14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Edge View Post
Blu-ray: "The Look and Sound of PERFECT".

Whatever happened to that?
THAT was the HD DVD format slogan. It went away when HD DVD did.


Universal used "The Perfect HI-DEF MOVIE Experience" for their early discs.
Disney was "Beyond High Definition"
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2018, 12:44 AM   #95
newtonp01 newtonp01 is offline
Active Member
 
Jun 2016
753
1783
Default

It's true that a 4K render may not cost 10's of millions for The Incredibles (though it likely would for any modern Pixar film!), but the point is it would still cost more than it would earn, barring a theatrical re-release. And honestly, I'm not too sure that there's that much detail in the texturing in a CG movie from 2004.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Edge View Post
Whatever.

When you buy 4K with your hard-earned money, don't you expect to be given 4K?

As a common buyer, I do.

I was sorely disappointed w/ Terminator 2's 4K transfer. I'm baffled by those who complain about the Back to the Future trilogy BDs receiving what they deem to be inferior transfers, but are perfectly okay with movies on a 4K physical format not having native 4K transfers. Seems like a double standard to me.

Blu-ray: "The Look and Sound of PERFECT".

Whatever happened to that?
Firstly, we're not common buyers here. The common buyer is purchasing DVD's and streaming low-bitrate video.

Secondly, T2 is actually a true 4K scan, as mentioned earlier. The majority of 2K upscales look better than it.

Thirdly, as a buyer I expect to be given the best presentation possible. Regardless of an upscale or not, UHD's (as mentioned in practically every other post on this forum) generally still have HDR, WCG, 10bit, better compression, immersive audio, and even at 2K still have an increase in detail. And if we're being really pedantic you aren't being gyped by the studio because the container of the disc is 4K, no matter what is in it. But regardless of all that - I love the movie as an art form. I'll always pay top dollar to have my favorite movies in the absolute best presentation possible no matter what it is.

And as to your last point, that's just a marketing slogan. Not all blu-rays are perfect. Would you go to McDonalds and sue them if you don't love it?

I hope this doesn't sound too confrontational. Don't get me wrong, I would love a true 4K render but it's just not feasible for the producers and it's most likely never gonna happen so why not get the next best thing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AgeofUltron View Post
Crossing fingers for Apocalypto and the Village next!
I would LOVE to get Apocalypto but I'd be honestly surprised if we ever see it on the format.

Last edited by newtonp01; 03-15-2018 at 12:48 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
ryantoyota (05-12-2018)
Old 03-15-2018, 01:31 AM   #96
Jay Mammoth Jay Mammoth is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
Jay Mammoth's Avatar
 
Mar 2011
Buffalo NY
5
588
1612
63
14
1
24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Edge View Post
But still, you may as well just stick with your 2K BDs. They’re both wasting money and time putting an inferior (in 2018 standards) 2K transfer on a 4K BD and calling it 4K. If you’re gonna realease your feature in 4K, it’s best to not half-ass it.
Nah, I Buy UHDs because they look better than the bluray.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2018, 02:21 AM   #97
BallistikBluray BallistikBluray is offline
Active Member
 
BallistikBluray's Avatar
 
Jan 2017
22
201
1
Default

Most people don't know what a digital intermediate is, so Disney wouldn't be able to sell more copies based on that fact alone. Makes sense for them to use the 2k. I will be buying this because I still haven't got the Blu-ray for this one. Hope we get a steelbook!
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2018, 02:45 AM   #98
benji888578 benji888578 is offline
Special Member
 
benji888578's Avatar
 
Aug 2013
USA
132
1574
56
36
1
22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i_max2k2 View Post
Day one (my favorite animated movie).

...
Still my all-time favorite animated movie also.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pieter V View Post
Back in 2012 Dolby showcased some scenes of The Incredibles in Dolby Atmos. No idea, if they were working on an actual Dolby Atmos remix, but OK.

https://www.theverge.com/2012/6/11/3...m-demo-theater...
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterTHX View Post
Incredibles had a hugely active Dolby Surround EX mix theatrically. I would not be surprised in the least if Bird/Pixar had Skywalker remix it into Atmos like Incredibles 2 will be.
Considering they were working on (and I assume, completed, but not released) a 3D conversion set for 2014 theatrical & 3D BD release, it's highly likely an Atmos (theatrical) mix was also already in the works/done, (...the Atmos demo would either be to explore the option or because it was already in the works), also, Finding Nemo in 2012 was re-released in 3D and Dolby Atmos (in theaters), Disney has been including Atmos mixes on their 4K/UHD releases so far, so I'd be surprised if the UHD BD doesn't have Atmos.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZHobbs View Post
http://www.tested.com/art/movies/449...-3d-interview/

Yup


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by jala12 View Post
Would they have to re-render anything or would this be the same render that they used for the BD?
according to the above mentioned (2012) article, it is possible: "We do have the ability to re-render any of our films at a higher resolution such as 4K should we choose to in the future." ...but, they could upscale the 2K DI, if they are lazy. Seems like re-rendering for 4K is a no-brainer for a completely computer based film, (IMO).

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToEhrIsHuman View Post
Personally I'd like to finally have 'The Incredibles' in 3D
me too

Last edited by benji888578; 03-15-2018 at 02:49 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2018, 03:58 AM   #99
guachi guachi is offline
Expert Member
 
Oct 2017
380
1161
683
2
Default

Even if there are now clear visual benefits to 4k re-render Disney could always put a marketing blurb on the cover saying "All new re-mastered in 4k for the best viewing experience!"

It's Disney and if anyone can make such an endeavour financially worthwhile it'd be Disney as they seem to be good at getting top dollar for catalog animated films. The Incredibles probably has a far smaller market among new buyers than it would to double-dippers so marketing matters more in getting people to buy than the mere existence of the film would.

I'm not going to sweat it, myself. But how Disney handles this release is a signal to how they might handle future releases.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2018, 04:16 AM   #100
Dubstar Dubstar is offline
Blu-ray Prince
 
Dubstar's Avatar
 
Jun 2008
down at Fraggle Rock
1
201
1953
304
4
33
29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guachi View Post
Even if there are now clear visual benefits to 4k re-render Disney could always put a marketing blurb on the cover saying "All new re-mastered in 4k for the best viewing experience!"

It's Disney and if anyone can make such an endeavour financially worthwhile it'd be Disney as they seem to be good at getting top dollar for catalog animated films. The Incredibles probably has a far smaller market among new buyers than it would to double-dippers so marketing matters more in getting people to buy than the mere existence of the film would.

I'm not going to sweat it, myself. But how Disney handles this release is a signal to how they might handle future releases.
if they continue compressing audio dynamic range on their discs, they truly are stupid.

Last edited by Dubstar; 03-15-2018 at 04:26 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
blujacket (03-15-2018), The Edge (03-16-2018)
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > 4K Ultra HD > 4K Blu-ray and 4K Movies



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:37 PM.