|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() £49.99 | ![]() £22.99 | ![]() £39.99 | ![]() £30.60 1 day ago
| ![]() £16.99 | ![]() £16.99 | ![]() £9.99 | ![]() £13.99 | ![]() £10.99 | ![]() £14.99 | ![]() £9.99 | ![]() £9.99 |
![]() |
#101 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
I was about to order the steelbook of this (just finally ordered the LotR: Extended BDs - from Zavvi and out of stock at the moment but under £30 for the first time I think so hoping they will get some in and honour the price! - and was hoping to have a marathon viewing) but news of the Extended version in Q4 means I think I'll wait... hope the extended gets a steelbook release too!
|
![]() |
![]() |
#104 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
Not interested in 3D at all, so as long as the Extended edition is also available in a 2D only edition, I'm happy.
Presumably there'll be a boxed set once all three films are released, but that means waiting another three years or so before buying them at all, or else buying now and knowing that you'll have to double-dip once the box comes. Instead, I'd love to be able to buy the first BD in a box that makes a companion to the LotR Extended set, with space intended for the second and third films when they come. |
![]() |
![]() |
#106 | ||
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
If you search for The Hobbit it comes up in the results with the £13 price and the option to add it to your basket but once you try and checkout it says Quote:
Last edited by Buddy Ackerman; 02-20-2013 at 08:02 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#108 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
For those who were worried/annoyed/concerned that we wouldn't be able to access the live stream preview of Desolation of Smaug due to our release date being after the event - looks like Amazon customers will be in luck:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#109 |
Expert Member
|
![]()
Hmm,may have to go with amazon then despite the fact they no longer offer release date delivery!!
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#110 |
Active Member
|
![]()
There and Back Again has been pushed back to December 2014. To be honest, I thought they'd do that. It's more of a Christmas film than a summer one.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#112 | |
Gaming Moderator
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#113 |
Expert Member
|
![]()
I will only buy the blu ray of the film i saw in the cinema. In my humble opinion the film is as long and as detailed as it needs to be. Adding another hour or two would probably just drag it out as it was already 1 minute off three hours!! It may have worked with lotr and i don't dispute that but they have already added so much more to the hobbit film than it has. Three 2-3hour movies are quite enough for me. So i will be picking up the standard 2D edition besides after waiting so long for this to come out on blu ray waiting til october for an extended version would be out of the question for me.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#115 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#117 |
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]()
I haven't seen the film yet but it's one BD that will be opened as soon as it arrives and put in the player straight-away.
I know it's bee said a few times but I still don't understand why we need three films to tell the story of one shortish book, The Fellowship of the Rings is 531 pages, The Two Towers 416 and The Return of the King 624 and only needed one film each, The Hobbit is 310 pages! It would be nice to watch a complete story but I guess we have to wait a few years... |
![]() |
![]() |
#118 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
More specifically with The Hobbit and Lord of the Rings, there's a huge difference in the storytelling of former and the latter. The Hobbit is a very plainly written, episodic story where very little detail is given over what is needed to move the plot along with minimum characterization. Which is fine for the children's book it is - it's a classic - but would have felt rushed if directly adapted (in my opinion of course). And while a battle in a book like that can be described in a couple of lines it's not something that a film can do - unless you turn a days-long battle into a two minute montage which would obviously be very unsatisfactory! Lord of the Rings however is written in a way where everything is detailed - the language, the world around them, the culture. It's a book concerned with the details as much as it is the plot as Tolkien was building up Middle-Earth and was interested in bringing as much detail to the cultures and history of the world as possible - there are paragraphs after paragraphs of descriptions of the land. Of course a film adaptation doesn't need this much detail and that which it does need it can tell visually. If The Hobbit had been written in the same sweeping, detailed prose that Lord of the Rings was then it would be a much longer book. As much as The Hobbit has been expanded, so has Lord of the Rings been condensed. I was wondering why three films would be needed too - and it's something that can't be fairly judged as right or wrong until we have seen them all - but, having seen the first part and seeing where it ends, I can't imagine having to sit through to the point where the film was due to end if it was a two-parter - we would have been talking at least an extra forty minutes. So I can see the logic so far and am interested in seeing how the other two play out. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#119 | ||
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]() Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#120 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|