|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $82.99 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $35.94 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $23.60 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $101.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $34.68 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $33.54 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $28.10 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $48.44 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 |
![]() |
#102 |
Banned
|
![]()
I don't have a problem at all with the CGI or overall visual style.
I think stripping it down from its intended 120-fps to 24-fps, creates this weird sort of 'video' look, that I actually think wouldn't be as noticeably present in its intended format. If that makes sense. I hope that Paramount puts out a UHD for this at 60fps, similar to what Sony did with Bill Lynn. This film could be an interesting look into what higher framerates can do for films of this genre. Looks to be a ton of gun and hand-to-hand combat, that is staged with some pretty good angles, so I am curious to see how that would come across with the hyper-realistic visual style. I'm still partial to 24fps myself--but I am not against seeing how higher framerates can continue to be used through trial and error. At some point, a filmmaker is going to crack the visual language for it. |
![]() |
![]() |
#103 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
Because of the 360-degree shutter angle as shot (movies are usually shot with a 180-degree shutter) then you're getting a lot of that 'soap opera' motion in the trailer, even at 24p, but it's still going to look HELLA soapy in 120 or even in 60, it's an unavoidable effect of having so much temporal information vs the strobey 24p motion we're so used to.
Me, I gots no problem with 24p in itself but I loved the hyper-real look of Billy Lynn's @ 60p on the UHD so I'm looking forward to seeing if Ang can actually combine a decent story with those stunning visuals this time around. The de-aging looks stellar, apart from that first shot in profile in the trailer. In the last shot of the young one in the trailer he looks more like Jaden Smith than Will IMO. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Gacivory (04-24-2019) |
![]() |
#104 |
Banned
|
![]()
Oh, I know with the higher framerate that it'll have the hyper-realism look to it--but I was saying that taking the intended 120-fps and taking it down to 24fps, probably makes that hyper-real look not come off as naturally intended as the 120fps it was shot at.
But, yeah, I think that visually, it looks solid still. So, not sure why another poster said it looked like a mess. |
![]() |
![]() |
#108 | |
Blu-ray Archduke
|
![]()
Well, the concept of the film was originally conceived in 1997, lol:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#116 |
Blu-ray Knight
May 2017
|
![]()
The trailer just ran during the NFL Draft. I looks like it could be something good.
Hopefully, it'll be shown in that high frame rate. |
![]() |
![]() |
#118 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
The CG looks fine except when showing the side of Smith's young face early on.
The irony is using this technology on Will Smith, and not on someone a bit less ageless. All the dude has to do is shave and grow taller hair. Boom, he's 20 again instead of 30. |
![]() |
![]() |
#119 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
Plot twist: the trailer doesn't have any CG yet
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
ang lee, gemini man, sci-fi |
|
|