|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $49.99 | ![]() $29.99 20 hrs ago
| ![]() $36.69 | ![]() $34.96 | ![]() $29.96 19 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $80.68 | ![]() $44.73 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.99 | ![]() $18.00 1 hr ago
| ![]() $86.13 1 day ago
| ![]() $19.99 1 hr ago
|
![]() |
#121 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
I tried watching the Artist today so I can really give my opinion it based on the previous discussions of this thread but I couldn't do it. After about a half hour I was bored out of my mind and shut it off and deleted it from the Hard Drive. I was hoping and expecting for more.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#122 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
I didn't care for The Artist, but I have no big qualms with the Academy giving it best picture. I thought The Desendants was a better film and for me it was my best picture. I like to think the most positive thing about The Artist was that it hopefully made people intrested in looking at older films. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#123 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
While Artist is...good, it's just not great, in that I'm still not sure exactly what the point of it was. (We're never told straight out why Valentin becomes a self-pitying has-been, so we just sit there and wait for somebody to slap some sense into him--Which isn't until the very, very last scene, and if we've seen "Singin' in the Rain", like Haznavicius clearly has, we're already at least an hour ahead of him.) Which doesn't really persuade me out of the notion that the Academy was giving a sentimental vote to "A movie that celebrates the magic of early Hollywood and silent films...It's the ONLY ORIGINAL film this year to do that! But why would Scorsese make kiddy CGI cartoons?" ( ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#124 | ||
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
To comment on the movie itself, The Artist is more concerned with being an exercise in technique and homage than it is with story, to some detriment. It was a crowdpleaser though - most everyone I know who saw it loved it, and I liked it fine enough - so in that sense it is a worthy Best Picture winner. As a silent film outside of Dujardin's performance it is somewhat pedestrian, but the attention that it brought to forthcoming silents on blu is appreciated. Last edited by Cinemach; 01-05-2013 at 10:25 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#125 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
I am just really tired of filmmakers who make great, cool, fun films not being rewarded while people who make things like Hurt Locker, Crash, The Kings Speech ,The Artist get all the award glory. It just is not right because these are not the best films of the year in watchability or lasting impact. It just does not compute to me how this year Django is gonna get neglected by the Oscars and they are gonna give the awards to Lincoln or Argo or Zero Dark Thirty or something else completely undeserving and it will be yet disappointing Oscars. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#126 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#128 |
Member
|
![]()
Well, those who didn't like The Artist can be happy that this year they will award an American film with the big prize. There's no going around this.
You know, 2012 was so great that I feel like for once we could have ten nominees in Best Picture and all of them would be good films. Last year they found 9 and one of them still was Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close, not to mention the year they had 10. In the end I think that this time we will see 7 or 8 nominees, leaving out something really good like The Master. So... this is the year when I don't want to see only 5 nominees, that would most likely leave out Django Unchained, for example. The five sure-nominees seem to be Lincoln, Zero Dark Thirty, Argo, Les Misérables and Life of Pi. |
![]() |
![]() |
#129 | |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#130 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#131 |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]()
You guys clearly don't understand the point of things like the People's Choice Awards compared to the Academy Awards. Anyone who thinks that 'The Artist' is one of the most disgusting movies the year it was made needs a reality check, and come to understand that the the whole reason it won was because the Academy fell in love with a nostalgic love letter to the silent era. It may not have been the best movie of the year, but that's insane hyperbole to say that's it's one of the most disgusting of the year and that you'd want the actor and director to rot in hell.
You guys sound like you're trying to be the "cool kids" who don't like movies that are awarded, thinking the big blockbusters need to be nominated and win over things like 'Lincoln', which misses the point of the academy awards. We get it, you guys want films for the masses to win, but the kicker is, the last few years, the Academy HAS been nominating movies for the masses. Last year especially, and this year as well. 'Lincoln' is a great movie that critics and audiences are getting behind. It's definitely the front runner to win right now. And even the films that could be runners up, like 'Argo', 'Silver Linings Playbook', and the others are as well. You may not like the films, that doesn't mean others don't and that they don't deserve recognition. I loved 'Django' as well, and it's my second favorite movie of the year, but I don't think it quite deserves best picture. 'Lincoln', on the other hand, I could definitely get behind winning. Every once in a while, the Academy does get behind the cool fun movies, look at the year 'Rocky' won, but if you guys can't see why things like 'The King's Speech' or 'The Godfather' won, then I don't know what to tell you. Maybe the Academy Awards just isn't for you and you should stick to things like the People's Choice Awards, Spike TV awards, or MTV Movie Awards. They all seem to be falling more into the categories of what you guys want. I love fun movies too, look at my collection. But I also understand why that the academy isn't necessarily looking for the fun movie. They're looking for other things. It took me a long time to understand that, but when I did, it made sense, and it's become much more rewarding when I watch these films. I love being diverse enough to love things like 'The Avengers' and 'Lincoln', or 'The Social Network' and 'Sherlock Holmes'. I do want to see directors like Fincher finally get their due, but it took how long for Scorsese to finally get his award? Good things come to those who wait, and just because these films or directors don't get nominated or win awards doesn't make them bad movies. That doesn't even make them the worst movies of the year, and they can still be the best, to YOU. Film is subjective, and clearly that's what all these awards shows clearly show us. Just because your favorite movie of the year doesn't get nominated doesn't mean the academy is wrong. In their heads, they're right, because film is subjective to them. I'd say they're right between 70% to 80% of the time, but sometimes I disagree with them too. But I don't think they need to nominate different movies. I like the ones they choose, because it's good to see great movies get recognition. Last edited by Walts Ghost; 01-06-2013 at 03:40 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#132 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#133 | |
Senior Member
|
![]()
You and I agree on everyone except Best Picture and Best Actor.
I believe Silver Linings Playbook will win Best Picture Joaquin Phoenix Will win for The Master Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#134 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
I really think Looper should be Nominated for Best Picture and Best Director Rian Johnson. It sucks that it won't.. but Looper was my 2012 pick for Best Picture. It's sad the academy hates on Sci-fi so much.
Lincoln was great... albeit slow in parts.... Spielberg just seems to try sooo damn hard with every movie to Win Best Picture. We get it, you are great. Also if John Goodman doesn't get a Nom for Argo.... Wow... , I know Arkin was great but geez... |
![]() |
![]() |
#135 | |
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#137 | |
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Please, there's nothing disgusting with The Artist just because people like it and you don't. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#138 |
Active Member
Apr 2010
Belgium
|
![]()
Perks of being a wallflower should be nominated for Best picture and maybe some acting noms.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#139 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
Well that's a massive overreaction. They can rot in hell because they've won an Oscar? Not to mention that you can't blame them for Tarantino and Lee not having Oscars when they didn't compete in the same year. And is what was is thefilm itself 'disgusting'? Not the reaction to it or the awards glory it go, but the film itself? It wasn't Oscar bait, it was a small, unpretentious, fun film (ironically something you feel doesn't get Oscar recognition), it was one of the most inoffensive films released in recent memory. I can't think of a single way that the film itself was disgusting, merely another case of internet hyperbole.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#140 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
I disagree with this. His last four films have been Indy 4, Tintin, War Horse and Lincoln. That's 50:50 in terms of 'wanting to win Best Picture'. His next is Robopocalypse which is definitely not aiming for Best Picture either.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|