|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $81.99 | ![]() $49.99 15 hrs ago
| ![]() $49.99 15 hrs ago
| ![]() $20.32 1 day ago
| ![]() $71.99 | ![]() $11.92 1 day ago
| ![]() $8.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $7.50 1 day ago
| ![]() $20.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $26.99 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $14.99 |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
|
![]()
I have a soundbar but I'm about ready to take the plunge and get a receiver. I'm trying to decide if I want to go 2.0, 2.1, 3.1 or 5.1, and I'm having a hard time figuring out what I'd actually get with different audio tracks at different configurations.
Setup is LG B7, Panasonic UB820, current model Chromecast (4K/HDR), and a laptop (less concerned about that for sound as it's pretty much only used for the kids to play games occasionally). I also used to have a laserdisc player and am strongly considering getting another. This is cinema-only (does not need to do double duty for music or anything like that). I lean more towards dialogue-heavy films (Criterion et al), but I assume a mono or stereo mix sounds essentially the same no matter which kind of system you're using. I just want the action movies to sound great when I do watch them ![]() I think the easiest way to ask is to write out what I think happens in each scenario and hopefully people can confirm, or correct me where I'm wrong. (I'll also try to keep this post up to date, for posterity, since I haven't found this info in a single place anywhere I've looked.) DVD/LD DTS/DD to 2.x/3.1: 5.1 mix with info on the missing channels missing (i.e., no downmixing) DTS-MA/TrueHD (any) to 2.x: Downmixed to 2.0 DTS-MA/TrueHD 5.1 to 3.1: 5.1 mix with info on the missing channels missing (i.e., no downmixing) DTS-MA/TrueHD 7.1 to 3.1: Downmixed to 5.1 with info on the missing channels missing DTS-MA/TrueHD 7.1 to 5.1: Downmixed to 5.1 Atmos/DTS:X: Same behavior as 7.1 Further, I'm under the impression that 2.1 isn't really a thing and that the receiver just directs the appropriate frequencies to the sub from the 2.0 mix - is that correct? Thanks in advance for any help here! |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Blu-ray Ninja
Sep 2013
UK
|
![]()
They will be down mixed - you can’t just ignore the rear channels in a 5.1 for example as you’d ruin the audio mix, so all the channels are “folded down” for stereo for example. Usually this is fine but very rarely you’ll come across a disc that has issues folded down.
Atmos/DTS X is a bit different. Those extra sounds are in the core 7.1 mix, and only receivers compatible will be able to unpick the metadata and place them above. So even though it’s a bit different you still don’t lose actual sound just the discrete channels. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Junior Member
|
![]() Quote:
The type of "folding" for 3.1 was something else I'd wondered about. At one point I had read something that suggested the downmixes go 7.1 -> 5.1 -> 2.0 (with Atmos/DTS:X just being metadata in the 7.1 mix as you mention). If there's no such thing as a 3.1 mix, do 3.1 systems get the 2.0 mix with a phantom center speaker? Or do they get the 5.1 mix with the rear info dropped? That's interesting! Is there a list of those somewhere? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Blu-ray Ninja
Sep 2013
UK
|
![]()
Even the lossy codecs do, yes.
If a 3.1 soundbar is fully compatible with the codecs it is receiving, it will also downmix to a true 3.1 sound, folding down the rear channels. If it’s not compatible (many don’t do DTS) then it’s just to 2.0. But still a fold down, not a deletion. Usually a mix will be fully checked to ensure it folds down properly, but sometimes it can fold down out of phase (Doctor Who Day if the Doctor 3D version is one I can recall) or overpower dialogue. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
audio, surround |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|