|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $42.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $22.50 1 day ago
| ![]() $63.50 1 day ago
| ![]() $19.89 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $79.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $25.60 | ![]() $149.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $19.99 | ![]() $26.28 1 day ago
| ![]() $289.99 |
![]() |
#30522 | |
Power Member
|
![]() Quote:
Newer movies on DVD look too soft on the player. I actually wonder if that is maybe due to the lack of care studios are putting in their DVDs vs. Blu-Ray or even 4K?? People need to understand though that as the resolution goes up, DVD is going to look worse and worse. But overall, I like the DVD playback of the 820. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Vilya (03-02-2021) |
![]() |
#30524 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
On most cases, DV looks better on my Panasonic 65GZ1000 OLED over HDR10 (could be due to the way tone mapping works on my TV). The improvements are mostly subtle and comes in the form of deeper / nuanced colours and better rendition of highlights. For instance, Man of Steel, The Prestige DV stream looked better TO ME EYES over the HDR10 on disc. Yesterday, I compared Maze Runner D+ DV Vs. HDR10 (disc/stream). I noticed differences right off the bat. In terms of colour palette and highlight rendition, D+ was noticeably better. However, The disc did better on fast motion scenes due to better compression. Otherwise, it's like tossing a coin. For those who are strictly physical, better get a capable TV to enjoy your collection. I am planning to upgrade to Sony 77A90J or Panasonic JZ2000 subject to how these turn out as there is so much hype around these TVs at least in the UK. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30525 |
Active Member
Aug 2020
|
![]()
That was before the 20% discount and I had a $75 credit as well. It was definitely worth waiting for it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30526 | |
Blu-ray King
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: |
![]() |
#30527 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
But many discs with MEL are just 77 Kbps. Do you think this would really improve compression on top HDR10? Do understand the DV enhancement layer is saving some of these Studio Canal UHDs from falling apart. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30529 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
I hate these types of comparison. People have the tendency to think that they are actually comparing the differences between the two by looking at the YouTube stream. This is as foolish as doing audio comparison by listening and comparing the different system via audio recording.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30530 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
You can even see Geoff posting comparison pictures in his reviews. Some people have the time and passion to go the extra mile to help others. At least he is not taking crap like Quantum who thinks HDR is a scam. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30531 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
![]() The same is true with speaker/headphone comparisons. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30533 | ||
Blu-ray King
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
|
||
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Steedeel (Yesterday) |
![]() |
#30534 |
Blu-ray Archduke
|
![]()
[QUOTE=Geoff D;18684946]Where did I say that MEL improves compression? I was referring to the underlying HDR10 layer of the MEL discs which will, 9 times out of 10, still be better compressed than the stream. Indeed, David Mackenzie prefers to use MEL because he can fully optimise the HDR10 encode and just bolt on the dynamic metadata. So even though the MEL disc and the stream are both just 10-bit transport streams plus dynamic metadata, the disc still wins for compression. Usually
![]() Disc for the win as usual! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|