|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $48.55 | ![]() $24.99 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.99 | ![]() $21.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.99 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $13.99 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.99 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $17.99 22 hrs ago
| ![]() $48.33 | ![]() $29.96 | ![]() $13.99 | ![]() $17.99 |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
May 2008
|
![]()
I am in the market for a blu-ray camcorder and have done enough research to confuse myself. I have a 58 inch Panasonic 1080P Plazma TV, receiver that sends HDMI 3 to the TV from several sources including a Sony Playstation 3 on which I can play blu-ray movies. The broadcast I receive over DirecTV are 1080i; the sony playstation sends 1080p to the TV. Blu-ray 1080p is much superior to 1080i.
My question is: Are there any camcorders on the market that record in 1080p? My research shows that the JVC GZ-HD7 and Hitachi's blu-ray disc camcorder have a lot of talk of blu-ray on their website but refer to blu-ray "full HD" without saying if recording is in 1080i or 1080p. Apparently playback can be 1080p but the question I have is what is the recording format; 1080i or 1080p. Does anyone know if there are any camcorders on the market that record in 1080p? Thanks, Ed |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Special Member
Feb 2008
|
![]()
I am pretty sure they are all 1920x1080i for consumer models. Non-full HD models like HDV tape are 1440x1080i (anamorphic) the picture is actually 4:3 then the pixels are stretched horizontally in to a 16:9 picture (still looks impressive). Go with the Sony HDR-SR12, the picture is amazing just forget about the i and p, and look at the picture! We have bought two of them for the business. Probably be purchasing the semi-pro Sony PMW-EX1 soon!
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Active Member
|
![]()
I just picked up the Sony HDR-SR11 (just like the SR12 but with only 60Gb hard drive.) I know it only records in 1920x1080/60i. Would there be any benefit to deinterlacing on the computer and making it 1920x1080/30p before burning it to Blu or should I just burn it as is? any thoughts would be appreciated.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Special Member
Feb 2008
|
![]()
I would leave it native. Progressive tends to only work when the original source is progressive. If you do play around with de-interlacing it, make sure you don't lose the natively shot video, and be sure to let us know your comparisons. I think where motion is used, de-interlacing it would do more harm than good. But that's all just theory until you try it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Special Member
Feb 2008
|
![]()
I had a De-interlacing option back on Premiere 6.5 (which is a little old now) I think I used it for still images only.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
should I get a blu-ray camcorder? | Blu-ray Camcorders | ulri4651 | 28 | 06-19-2008 11:10 AM |
Blu-ray camcorder | Blu-ray Camcorders | jono1414 | 0 | 05-29-2008 08:39 PM |
HD camcorder question | Blu-ray Camcorders | Amon37 | 6 | 03-17-2008 11:02 PM |
Blu-ray camcorder | Blu-ray Camcorders | Ron | 11 | 10-04-2006 10:32 AM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|