|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $48.55 | ![]() $24.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $31.99 | ![]() $13.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.96 | ![]() $48.33 | ![]() $30.00 | ![]() $24.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $44.96 | ![]() $21.99 | ![]() $100.00 | ![]() $21.18 1 hr ago
|
![]() |
#163 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
The link in that ^ post from ericsson also contains Parts 1 and 3. But, img, I do like Youtube as a vehicle. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#165 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
Exactly what I thought, I'm sure all the company's that have patents with Blu ray have alot of interest in new Blu ray format's succeeding. Would not make sense to completely stop that patent revenue stream.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#166 |
Senior Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#168 |
Special Member
Jan 2007
|
![]()
So h.265 doesn't inherently produce better-quality video, correct? It simply allows you to encode at a higher bitrate because it produces files of a smaller size?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#169 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#170 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
Vargo, img eL with NAB 2014 imminent - Beamr video is back in the news yet again, this time with optimization of HEVC…http://www.prnewswire.com/news-relea...253738081.html
|
![]() |
![]() |
#171 | |
Senior Member
|
![]()
I wonder what encoder they stole this time.
https://gist.github.com/Daiz-/5043109 I would not bother to waste any more breath on these guys. Quote:
It allows you to use a lower bitrate (thus lower size, or lower bandwidth requirements) while maintaining the same quality. Or to use the same bitrate while increasing the quality. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#172 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#173 |
Senior Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#174 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
x265 0.9 was released the other day, I will test it later but here are some screens from encodes I did a few weeks ago using 0.8:
http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison.php?id=67384 http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison.php?id=67386 It is still not ready for prime-time (there is a tendency to blur fine detail) but they are getting there, and you can clearly see how it outperforms x264 in these examples. |
![]() |
![]() |
#175 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
H.265 would give you a better picture. It gives a Bigger Resoluton and more Pixels per square inch. Also 4k and 8k is a part of H.265 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#176 |
Active Member
Dec 2007
Ft. Myers, FL
|
![]()
Anyone heard what is the status of the first amendment to h.265. I know it includes extensions to HEVC to support UHD with higher frame rates, greater bit depth and higher fidelity color sub-sampling schemes. Some or all of these 4K/UHD extensions to HEVC are anticipated to be needed for the Blu-ray UHD (4K) format, such as support for 4:2:2 with 10 or 12-bit depth and frame rates up to 60 Hz. Early in 2013, it was said that the first amendment to h.265 was expected to be completed by the end of 2013, but I have not seen any official announcement out of ITU that it as been approved yet.
Last edited by ronjones; 05-12-2014 at 01:18 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#177 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
A reminder…..the contribution document deadline for the next JCT-VC meeting is June 20. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#178 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread...ns#post8728050 at the earliest, but Richard keeps a better handle on the meetings than I do…. https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread...vc#post9101143 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#179 | |
Senior Member
Oct 2007
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#180 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
See keynote #3 http://www.sid.org/ |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|