|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $79.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $20.46 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $25.60 | ![]() $28.99 | ![]() $289.99 | ![]() $24.99 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $29.49 | ![]() $34.34 1 day ago
| ![]() $14.99 | ![]() $24.99 | ![]() $14.41 1 hr ago
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
|
![]()
I still am an owner of plenty HD DVD movies. The majority have lossy Audio and low bitrate Mpeg 4 HD.. 12 to 15 Mbps. So I wonder how HD DVD would have handled HEVC and ultra HD 4k?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Power Member
|
![]()
Well, they would likely used quad-layer 60GB discs with HEVC, if they could get the disc replication yield worked out and didn't have to use expensive new machines or replication upgrades like Blu-Ray required. Toshiba was working on triple-layer 45GB discs when the format tanked and that probably would have barely been acceptable for UHD content, with no real extras, as BD-50 and BD-66 were included in the UHD-BD spec in order to utilize the available replication hardware and you'd obviously want the higher-capacity for quality, so long as the yields were acceptable.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
|
![]()
I see. didn't realize they were working on larger discs at the time. The ones that I have are 15gb standard and 30gb dual layer discs. I can tell you I have a few HD DVD discs that just quit working all together or skip very badly. I'm glad blu ray won the war! Blu Ray discs hold up much better as far as scratches. Wonder if HD DVD discs could have worked with a hard coating on them. We will never know......
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Blu-ray Duke
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|