|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $7.99 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $19.99 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $9.99 16 hrs ago
| ![]() $19.99 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $16.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $13.99 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $9.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $9.99 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $16.99 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $9.99 16 hrs ago
| ![]() $39.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.99 13 hrs ago
|
![]() |
#19541 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Anyway, if Transformers: Dark of the Moon didn’t do it by now, Titanic in 3D should make believers out of all but the most jaded conversion-aversion diehards that the science of 2D -> 3D conversion can hold its own (and in some cases allows for greater control and precision) as compared with native stereoscopic capture…https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread...or#post5283297 As an aside, relating to my mention of Men in Black III at the end of the above linked post ^ from October past….following pre-production testing using native stereoscopic capture (i.e. 3D rigs), the filmmaker chose to shoot in 2D and convert rather than shoot in 3D for the principal photography, given his directorial style during a comedic shoot, as well as his preference of lens and media choice which were better suited by using a 2D camera. In other words, he had confidence in the merits of preferring and doing a 2D -> 3D conversion for this motion picture over that of native 3D capture. More on that later when I’ve got more time. This is going to be a very busy week for me in terms of getting things done prior to heading out to NAB (it’s not just all about broadcast) 2012. |
|
![]() |
#19542 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19543 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19544 | |
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]() Quote:
It's a given every season! |
|
![]() |
#19545 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
#19546 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
Nice video
![]() Take that and the comments made in the paragraphs below the pic of the horse-back riders here…http://www.hometheater.com/content/h...-4k-way-page-2 , for even if one doesn’t understand the nuances of oversampling theory in order to harvest all 35mm detail and also to avoid aliasing (http://efilm.com/publish/2008/05/19/4K%20plus.pdf), and you don’t get the opportunity to tour a facility like Colorworks, I think it’s pretty evident as to the value of 4K scanning even for Blu-ray production (1920 x 1080 4:2:0 8-bit) and exhibition on 1080p displays. All I would add to the video is that 4K wetgate scanning greatly helps in reducing the time needed for frame-by-frame digital restoration using software tools (which is great) but it is of little help if the emulsion itself is damaged. |
![]() |
#19547 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
Shark, where’s that spiel you promised on the stuntman? Am I going to have to post a pic of all my Viewfinders https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread...le#post5981973 ( read the Wiki link)
Grand Prix Finisher Pins in order to encourage you to get on the stick? Geez, do I have to carry this thread all by myself. |
![]() |
#19548 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19549 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
People PM’ed me for pics of our Pom. Here he is wearing his little cap to go with the fact that the bride and groom were Scots and the wedding had a Scottish theme to it. (Deci do your thing when you get a chance)
The Little Fella by Night.jpg Last edited by Deciazulado; 11-13-2012 at 02:14 AM. |
![]() |
#19550 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Last edited by Deciazulado; 11-13-2012 at 02:16 AM. |
![]() |
#19551 | ||
Active Member
Oct 2008
|
![]() Quote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but a wetgate (be it printing or scanning) only helps with base-side scratches and dings, not emulsion-side, right? What's your opinion on the various IR dirt mapping schemes available? Imagetrends (the creators of Digital ICE) has a demo reel... |
||
![]() |
#19552 | ||
Super Moderator
|
![]() Quote:
(Ties in quite nicely with the Transformers reference) |
||
![]() |
#19554 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
#19555 | |
Senior Member
Oct 2008
|
![]() Quote:
thanks for the welcome, will try to post a bit more again but time is always at a premium these days. I may be old fashioned but I seriously doubt that I would watch my own movies in 4k - I have a feeling they will not quite reach the heights of "proper" feature films ![]() Good to hear though that people are looking for solutions to bring 4k to the displays - from what I hear 4k HDMI inputs are even scarcer than 4k HDMI outputs? What about TV stations and 4k? I remember back in the days 1080i HDTV movies were the first source of digitally delivered high definition movies that were already available when the first 1080p digital consumer projectors were released but this time there seems to be little hope of 4k movie content from TV stations, not even in Japan. Hope that the division of Sony where you are working is not affected by the layoffs! |
|
![]() |
#19557 | |
Banned
Feb 2009
Toronto
|
![]()
Whooops.
Greetings from Asheville... ![]() http://twitchfilm.com/interviews/201...ey-gilbert.php Quote:
|
|
![]() |
#19558 |
Blu-ray Count
Jul 2007
Montreal, Canada
|
![]()
Hi Penton, discussing 4K in another thread and making a typo (put 8" instead of 5"). It got me thinking.
Assuming read speed would not be an issue (since there are 12x BD-r drives)and normal BD is 1.5x, has anyone thought of increasing the diameter to increase cpacity? obviously there will be the issue of linear velocity at the outer rim, but if we move from 5" (12cm) to 8" (20cm) we would be more then quadrupling the capacity. (assuming my math is OK) |
![]() |
#19559 | |
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]() Quote:
Even at the commercial level, the goal is to do more while getting physically smaller. I'd be just fine with BD100's making the rounds before 8" platters make their return! |
|
![]() |
#19560 |
Expert Member
Aug 2007
|
![]()
The size of current optical discs is so entrenched with consumers, retail, and production lines that I don't want to even contemplate moving to a larger format. That, and blu-rays are thinner than previous formats by necessity, making larger diameter ones might cause strength and stability issues. Better to just add layers for now, I think.
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Ask questions to Compression Engineer insider "drmpeg" | Insider Discussion | iceman | 140 | 11-21-2019 05:40 AM |
Ask questions to Blu-ray Music insider "Alexander J" | Insider Discussion | iceman | 280 | 07-04-2011 06:18 PM |
Ask questions to Sony Pictures Entertainment insider "paidgeek" | Insider Discussion | iceman | 958 | 04-06-2008 05:48 PM |
Ask questions to Sony Computer Entertainment insider "SCE Insider" | Insider Discussion | Ben | 13 | 01-21-2008 09:45 PM |
UK gets "Kill Bill" 1&2, "Pulp Fiction", "Beowulf", "Jesse James", and more in March? | Blu-ray Movies - North America | JBlacklow | 21 | 12-07-2007 11:05 AM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|