Ah ha! Proof I wasn't as nuts as you all thought I was!

[AlexKx]

Now I swear. Proof that I wasn't freakin' nuts after all. You folks totally SLAMMED me for being off my rocker and flat on the floor when I found out over the last couple of months that Blu-Ray discs were being used for a TOTALLY different reason than what I understood that they were going to be used for after YEARS of waiting for it to be released since the year 2001 or so.

http://www.howstuffworks.com/framed....gy/3696306.stm

Now again. I TOTALLY think Blu-Ray's capacity should be used for High Definition before getting more hours onto one layer of a disc but it certainly IS different from what I understood it was going to be used for for a LONG time until the last couple of months according to this article if I am understanding it right. Am I not? I just didn't understand the facts of High Definition and that a clear cut one way decision was made for the entire industry. Again I think that the decision is the right one but am I still to understand that the storage space should be able to be increased more and more to hold more hours on one layer like it was originally thought it would?

[pedigree]

Originally Posted by AlexKx

Now I swear. Proof that I wasn't freakin' nuts after all. You folks totally SLAMMED me for being off my rocker and flat on the floor when I found out over the last couple of months that Blu-Ray discs were being used for a TOTALLY different reason than what I understood that they were going to be used for after YEARS of waiting for it to be released since the year 2001 or so.

http://www.howstuffworks.com/framed....gy/3696306.stm

Now again. I TOTALLY think Blu-Ray's capacity should be used for High Definition before getting more hours onto one layer of a disc but it certainly IS different from what I understood it was going to be used for for a LONG time until the last couple of months according to this article if I am understanding it right. Am I not? I just didn't understand the facts of High Definition and that a clear cut one way decision was made for the entire industry. Again it is the right one but am I still to understand that the storage space should be able to be increased more and more to hold more hours on one layer like it was originally thought it would?

you got that from my post on that other guys thread didnt you lol
glad it helped someone (unless you didnt get it there cuz then im owned)

wow that was your thread

[Ex Accountant]

He may have a point, but I still think he's nuts

[ADPNIGHTMARE]

LOL @ 2 Smokin Hot Mistresses in ex accountants sig

[pedigree]

Originally Posted by Ex Accountant

He may have a point, but I still think he's nuts

Sony Bravia KDL-52XBR2 LCD Flat Panel
Playstation 3
Panasonic SA-XR50 6.1 Receiver
Bose Surround Sound Speakers & Subwoofer
10,739 Blu-Ray Discs, 2 PS3 Games
1 Smokin Hot Wife
2 Smokin Hot Mistresses
1 Dog who can't catch a frisbee

Zomg you have 10,739 blu rays
no wonder you need 2 mistresses your wife wont have sex with you cuz u spend too much on bd's

[Shin-Ra]

FORUM RULES

2. Please do not discuss religion or politics

Thanks.

[kotton247]

Originally Posted by Shin-Ra

Thanks.

ha! I'm so lost about what the message is supposed to be in this thread, that I can't discuss anything.

[Maxell]

I wonder if that's still a possibility or if any company will ever do something like this: putting about 20+ hours of dvd resolution video on blu-ray disc. Some think this may be crazy, but it may be good for having old tv shows that can't really be upgraded to 1080p, but you have have all of "Threes Company: Season One" on one disc!

[Ascended_Saiyan]

It's a great idea, but I think they will have a REALLY hard time getting the read/write speed to a usable level (getting all that information on and reading it off the disc quickly).