|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $26.36 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.49 23 hrs ago
| ![]() $37.66 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $18.98 23 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.49 | ![]() $28.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $48.82 15 hrs ago
| ![]() $20.99 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $66.99 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $119.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $28.99 1 day ago
|
![]() |
#1 |
Active Member
Dec 2012
Santa Lucia, Malta
|
![]()
Hi guys,
as the title says I am between these 2 projectors for 4K movie viewing. No gaming or any other media except for movies. Please let me know which one would you choose and why. Thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
I would not get either projector personally since both of them are not true 4K projectors since they do not have a native 4K imaging chip. The Sony WX5000ES LCOS Laser projector is an entry level projector with native 3840 x 2160P imaging chip for $6,000.
https://www.soundandvision.com/conte...ojector-review However like the post mentions you are only interested in the two models mentioned. The one advantage of the Optoma UHZ65LV for $5,999 is that it has more resolution on the imaging chip when compared to the Epson LS12000. The Optoma uses a native 2716 x 1528P imaging chip with pixel shifting technology to simulate near 4K quality, however no HDR10+ on that projector. If I was not allowed to go with the native 4K Sony for $6,000, then I would choose the Epson LS12000 for $4,999 with a native 1,920 x 1080P LCD imaging panels that are optically shifted to simulate 4K resolution. The advantage of the Epson is the HDR10+ which offers the better picture quality then the Optoma when viewing native HDR10+ source material on 4K Blu-ray and 4K streaming. But the Optoma should provide better resolution because of a better imaging chip then the Epson when viewing 4K material. But overall picture quality should be for the Epson with the HDR10+ and better native contrast according to reviews and spec sheets. But finding a projector dealer to demo the projectors would be ideal to see the projectors in person. Only the Optoma projector offers Blu-ray 3D support which is a 1080P format, and if I was into 3D I would choose the Optoma. But for 2D 4K viewing the Epson would be better with HDR10+ material. But the true native 4K Sony for $6,000 is the best option for 4K Blu-ray viewing since one gets all the pixels on the screen. Epson LS12000 professional review https://www.soundandvision.com/conte...ojector-review Optoma UHZ65LV specs https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produ...tor.html/specs Last edited by HDTV1080P; 03-15-2023 at 10:21 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Active Member
Dec 2012
Santa Lucia, Malta
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | HDTV1080P (03-16-2023) |
![]() |
#5 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
The best quality single projector setups are Christie DLP Digital projectors for $113,000 to $150,000+. https://proavwarehouse.com/digital-p...ser-projector/ The best Sony LCOS projector is the VPL-GTZ380 for $80,000. 10,000 LUMENS output https://electronics.sony.com/tv-vide...rs/p/vplgtz380 However, for the average home theater, the best native 4K projector (LCOS) would be the JVC DLA-NZ9 with HDR10+ and 8K e-shift technology. Price is $25,999.95 and it offers Blu-ray 3D support. https://www.jvc.com/usa/projectors/procision/dla-nz9/ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Active Member
Dec 2012
Santa Lucia, Malta
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
Yes the Epson is a good projector with HDR10+ and contrast ratio (no 3D only 2D). However the weakness of the Epson is that it is native 1080P with simulated 4K quality since a shifting optical element is used instead of real native 4K imaging chip.
Quote “The LS12000 is not a "native" 4K projector—Epson continues to use 1,920 x 1,080 LCD panels for imaging duties and combines these with a shifting optical element to produce an "on screen" equivalent of 3,840 x 2,160 pixels with a dual-axis shift. This means the projector will not fully resolve single-pixel 4K patterns, but does provide near 4K quality from a normal seating distance on most screens. It is a bit disappointing that we haven't seen Epson jump into the native 4K display space yet with its consumer projectors. That said, there are no other projector makers currently offering native 4K models at this price point.” https://www.soundandvision.com/conte...ojector-review No under $100,000 consumer DLP projector or LCD projector offers a native 4K imaging chip. However starting at around $6,000 both JVC and Sony offer native 4K imaging chips using LCOS technology. Some commercial movie theaters install Sony LCOS 4K projectors. Plus Sony has that new entry level 4K LCOS Laser projector for only $6,000, but no 3D feature from that entry level model. Here is the list of JVC and Sony LCOS projectors to choose from. JVC has HDR10+ support where as Sony only offers standard HDR10. https://www.jvc.com/usa/projectors/procision/ https://electronics.sony.com/tv-vide...all-projectors Last edited by HDTV1080P; 03-17-2023 at 11:08 PM. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Robert Zohn (03-18-2023) |
![]() |
#8 | |
Active Member
Dec 2012
Santa Lucia, Malta
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
Also when upgrading a projector in 5 to 10 years, one can place the old model on EBAY and sometimes get half the value depending how much life is left on the Laser element. So a $6,000 projector might be able to be sold for $3,000 in 5 to 10 years later when one chooses to upgrade (maybe a lot more if there is inflation). I hope that information is helpful. Last edited by HDTV1080P; 03-18-2023 at 10:36 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
I would definitely recommend an OLED over a projector unless you have enough light-control that you can use it in pitch-black conditions. Otherwise you’ll be sacrificing picture quality since any ambient light will washout the projectedimage. An OLED can work better with some ambient light, as long as you don’t have all the windows open and lights on in the room.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
However, there are high-end native 4K DLP projectors that offer 50,000 and 60,000 lumens that can be used in a bright rooms with lights on or sunshine coming through the windows. But they generally cost over $100,000. I see now that for the first time a native 8K DLP imaging chip has been developed with a resolution of 7680 x 4320P with the new Digital Projection Insight Laser 8K projector. I do not see a price on this projector but I believe it might cost $300,000-$400,000+. Maybe more. It’s for professional installations in a commercial movie theater, big business, or a mansion home theater room. UPDATED PRICE AND INFO LINK FOR THE NATIVE 8K PROJECOTR https://forum.blu-ray.com/showpost.p...postcount=1373 https://www.digitalprojection.com/en...ser-8k-gen-ii/ (neat new native 8K DLP projector) https://na.panasonic.com/us/audio-vi...aser-projector (50,000 lumens) https://www.barco.com/en/product/xdl-4k60#specs (60,000 lumens) Last edited by HDTV1080P; 03-21-2023 at 10:18 PM. Reason: UPDATED INFO FOR NATIVE 8K PROJECTOR |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Active Member
Dec 2012
Santa Lucia, Malta
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
All the new native 4K JVC’s have HDR10+ starting with the entry level model DLA-RS1100 and DLA-NP5 with a list price of $6,999.95. Therefore, JVC’s entry level models are a $1,000 more than Sony’s entry level native 4K projector. Also all of JVC’s including the enter level model support Blu-ray 3D plus native 4096 x 2160P resolution along with the consumer 3840 x 2160P 4K mode. However, you might not want to get the entry level JVC DLA-RS1100 or DLA-NP5 for $7,000 since they are not Laser based light sources but instead use a bulb (lamp) source that needs to be replaced every 4,500 hours. The cheapest JVC projector with a Laser light source that lasts up to 20,000 hours is the JVC DLA-NZ7 and DLA-RS2100 for $10,999.95. The entry level Sony VPL-XW5000ES for $6,000 has features removed in order to get to that price point (No 3D, no native 4096 x 2160P instead native 3840 x 2160P 4K, manual lens adjustment, and no HDMI version 2.1). When comparing the Sony VPL-XW6000ES projector with 2,500 lumens for $11,999.99 the closes JVC version would be the JVC DLA-NZ8 and DLA-RS3100 for $15,999.95. The JVC costs $4,000 more then the Sony for various reasons. JVC has HDR10+ and its native 4K imaging chip simulates 8K with e-shift and it has a native 8K HDMI input.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Active Member
Dec 2012
Santa Lucia, Malta
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
https://www.jvc.com/usa/projectors/procision/dla-nz7/ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Active Member
Dec 2012
Santa Lucia, Malta
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
https://electronics.sony.com/tv-vide.../p/vplxw5000es |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Active Member
Dec 2012
Santa Lucia, Malta
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
https://hdr10plus.org/hdr10-content/ It also depends on how long you are planning on keeping your projector. If you plan on upgrading to a native 8K LCOS model in 5 years you might want to get the low cost entry level Sony model. If you plan on keeping your projector for 10 years or more then I would go with the JVC DLA-NZ7 or a higher end JVC model. Last edited by HDTV1080P; 03-26-2023 at 08:59 PM. |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|