My review of Quantum of Solace - Blu-ray Forum

partridge · 11-01-2008, 10:45 AM

So, I saw QOS last night...

I'll get this out of the way first - Casino Royale is better.

If you enjoyed CR you will love this one, but if you want a bigger, better film you won't get that (in my opinion).

QOS is a relentless film which seldom stops for breath, the set pieces are superb with a hell of a lot going on at times and you really feel the pain of some of the action. Once again Daniel Craig puts in a performance that is entirely convincing and you really feel the fight scenes, though they are not as brutal as CR's were.

This is a direct sequel to CR, the first time a Bond movie has done this and I get the feeling that Daniel Craig's time as Bond will form one continuous tale; no bad thing!

There is one particular set piece that I wish was longer, it is set against the backdrop of a performance of Tosca (opera) and is stunning - I'd go so far as to say, for an action sequence, it's beautiful. Towards its end it features a fantastic stand off between Bond and Greene.

So, no Q and only one "gadget" but no complaints from me. This is another cracking Bond film and underlines that Craig IS Bond, long may he reign

I've deliberately not put any spoilers in here I just wanted to give an initial feel for the movie, if you have anything specific to ask, please do, I'll check back later.

Summary: Go and see it, it's great but Casino Royale has the edge.

sbjork · 11-01-2008, 10:55 AM

I was worried when Marc Forster said that the running time was 100 minutes. That does not give much breathing room for anything but the action setpieces. Oh well, I shall see for myself on the 14th . . .

P@t_Mtl · 11-01-2008, 10:58 AM

Thanks for the post, will not be seeing it in theater, will wait for the srping when it come's out on BD. Bond films are about the only blind buy I would consider

partridge · 11-01-2008, 12:15 PM

I was concerned about the running time but I didn't feel it was a short film at all, it does work, though I'd prefer a longer film with some breathing space!

bajor27 · 11-01-2008, 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by partridge

I was concerned about the running time but I didn't feel it was a short film at all, it does work, though I'd prefer a longer film with some breathing space!

It's only 100 minutes? Wow, that does seem short

Moefiz · 11-01-2008, 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bajor27

It's only 100 minutes? Wow, that does seem short

Compare to CR which was over 2 1/2 hrs..it sure does seem short.

Blu-Ron · 11-01-2008, 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by partridge

So, I saw QOS last night...

I'll get this out of the way first - Casino Royale is better.

If you enjoyed CR you will love this one, but if you want a bigger, better film you won't get that (in my opinion).

QOS is a relentless film which seldom stops for breath, the set pieces are superb with a hell of a lot going on at times and you really feel the pain of some of the action. Once again Daniel Craig puts in a performance that is entirely convincing and you really feel the fight scenes, though they are not as brutal as CR's were.

This is a direct sequel to CR, the first time a Bond movie has done this and I get the feeling that Daniel Craig's time as Bond will form one continuous tale; no bad thing!

There is one particular set piece that I wish was longer, it is set against the backdrop of a performance of Tosca (opera) and is stunning - I'd go so far as to say, for an action sequence, it's beautiful. Towards its end it features a fantastic stand off between Bond and Greene.

So, no Q and only one "gadget" but no complaints from me. This is another cracking Bond film and underlines that Craig IS Bond, long may he reign

I've deliberately not put any spoilers in here I just wanted to give an initial feel for the movie, if you have anything specific to ask, please do, I'll check back later.

Summary: Go and see it, it's great but Casino Royale has the edge.

If you say that CR was better...QOS must be really bad!

partridge · 11-01-2008, 04:55 PM

sigh. Yeah, whatever, great contribution to the topic, y a w n

DeeChizzle · 11-01-2008, 06:53 PM

Although Casino Royal has grown on me I will probably like QOS better for two reasons...

1. Olga Kurylenko
2. The running time is only an hour and 45 minutes

partridge · 11-01-2008, 07:04 PM

Gemma Arterton is an eye catcher too, shame she's not in it that much

Olga Kurylenko has amazing legs!!!

DeeChizzle · 11-01-2008, 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by partridge

Gemma Arterton is an eye catcher too, shame she's not in it that much

Olga Kurylenko has amazing legs!!!

Olga Kurylenko has amazing everything

. My favorite Bond Girl.

Beta Man · 11-02-2008, 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by partridge

So, I saw QOS last night...

I'll get this out of the way first - Casino Royale is better..

I don't think Casino Royale is a very good movie........ The whole card-playing thing just dragged on..... and Craig isn't a very good Bond in my opinion...... I think they're getting too "PC" and that's not what Bond is about..... it could be the directors, it could be Craig, it could be the screen-writers.... who knows....

James Bond would never lower himself to play such a low-brow game such as Texas Hold-em......... no way.

I've been pretty disappointed in the newer Bond films, and since I love the older ones..... I feel like it's watching an old friend slowly die.....

I've purchased them all.... but I may have to pass on Quantum of Solace.... we'll see.

11-01-2008, 10:45 AM	#1
partridge Blu-ray Ninja Member since:Oct 2005 Location:England	My review of Quantum of Solace So, I saw QOS last night... I'll get this out of the way first - Casino Royale is better. If you enjoyed CR you will love this one, but if you want a bigger, better film you won't get that (in my opinion). QOS is a relentless film which seldom stops for breath, the set pieces are superb with a hell of a lot going on at times and you really feel the pain of some of the action. Once again Daniel Craig puts in a performance that is entirely convincing and you really feel the fight scenes, though they are not as brutal as CR's were. This is a direct sequel to CR, the first time a Bond movie has done this and I get the feeling that Daniel Craig's time as Bond will form one continuous tale; no bad thing! There is one particular set piece that I wish was longer, it is set against the backdrop of a performance of Tosca (opera) and is stunning - I'd go so far as to say, for an action sequence, it's beautiful. Towards its end it features a fantastic stand off between Bond and Greene. So, no Q and only one "gadget" but no complaints from me. This is another cracking Bond film and underlines that Craig IS Bond, long may he reign I've deliberately not put any spoilers in here I just wanted to give an initial feel for the movie, if you have anything specific to ask, please do, I'll check back later. Summary: Go and see it, it's great but Casino Royale has the edge.

Similar Threads
thread	Forum	Thread Starter	Replies	Last Post
Review - 007 Quantum of Solace	Wish Lists	Wanted10	0	03-19-2009 07:55 PM
Quantum of Solace blu-ray review	Movies	Twitch9	18	03-16-2009 10:39 PM
Anyone know when a Quantum Of Solace review will pop up	Feedback Forum	harryviewty	2	03-09-2009 02:39 AM
Quantum of Solace - IGN Review - 7.0 / 10.0	PS3	Marine Mike	32	02-03-2009 10:06 PM

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

11-01-2008, 10:55 AM	#2
sbjork Active Member Member since:Oct 2008	I was worried when Marc Forster said that the running time was 100 minutes. That does not give much breathing room for anything but the action setpieces. Oh well, I shall see for myself on the 14th . . .

11-01-2008, 10:58 AM	#3
P@t_Mtl Blu-ray Duke Member since:Sep 2008 Location:Montreal Home Theater Gallery:4 Blu-ray collection:452 DVD collection:513 Trading Score:3	Thanks for the post, will not be seeing it in theater, will wait for the srping when it come's out on BD. Bond films are about the only blind buy I would consider

11-01-2008, 12:15 PM	#4
partridge Blu-ray Ninja Member since:Oct 2005 Location:England	I was concerned about the running time but I didn't feel it was a short film at all, it does work, though I'd prefer a longer film with some breathing space!

11-01-2008, 04:55 PM	#8
partridge Blu-ray Ninja Member since:Oct 2005 Location:England	sigh. Yeah, whatever, great contribution to the topic, y a w n

11-01-2008, 06:53 PM	#9
DeeChizzle Power Member Member since:Nov 2007 Location:The Last Frontier Blu-ray collection:188 Blu-ray reviews:74 Trading Score:47	Although Casino Royal has grown on me I will probably like QOS better for two reasons... 1. Olga Kurylenko 2. The running time is only an hour and 45 minutes

11-01-2008, 07:04 PM	#10
partridge Blu-ray Ninja Member since:Oct 2005 Location:England	Gemma Arterton is an eye catcher too, shame she's not in it that much Olga Kurylenko has amazing legs!!!

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals