|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $24.96 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $19.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $27.13 23 hrs ago
| ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $27.57 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $29.95 |
![]() |
#1 | |
Banned
Jul 2009
|
![]() Quote:
The entire premise was built upon the fact tha an egg or eggs got aboard the Sullaco, more than likely via the queen. They just chose to not show it on screen to keep it more mysterious. Do you understand that, genius? A big part of the plot of the first part of this movie is about whether or not an Alien actually made it onto Fury 161. Showing a lot of the Alien on screen before that, and spelling it all out for the audience, works against that theme. Please read that several times so it soaks in a bit. Again, a plot hole is something accidental. You may as well be calling Ripley being lost in space for 50 years a plot hole becuase it doesn't sound plausible or the eggs in the diralect being a plot hole because how they got there isn't explained. Stop being rediculous. Just because you don't like the movie, doesn't mean you get to redefine words or accuse David Fincher or being an idiot. Yes, eggs were placed on the Sulacco in Alien 3 canon. Notice how you don't see the ****ing queen untill she pops out and slices Bishop in half. If we saw the queen the whole damn time, you would have a point, but you don't at all. The fact that Alien biology was added onto with Alien 3 also doesn't prove your point or else the queen herself would be a "plot hole." And Alien 3 really isn't that unpopular anymore. The extended cut has made people realize it actually has some merit. |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|