|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $24.96 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.99 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $17.49 54 min ago
| ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $13.99 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $30.50 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $29.96 |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Dec 2007
|
![]()
2001, Close Encounters, and Pirates received the highest rating for video quality on this web site's reviews. As a novice, help me understand the relative absence of film grain (a "clean" look) in 2001, a nearly 40-year-old film, and the presence of film grain in Pirates: At World's End, a brand new film, and the "abundance" of film grain in Close Encounters? I'm not sure that a novice viewer would give each film the same video quality rating.
Is it the type of film used? or a filming technique? or an artistic decision? |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Close Encounters vs. 2001: A Space Odyssey | Movie Polls | Sussudio | 142 | 10-14-2024 12:25 AM |
close encounters-which one? | United Kingdom and Ireland | uk-guy | 4 | 06-27-2008 12:27 AM |
|
|