|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $24.96 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $13.99 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $30.50 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $34.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $29.96 |
|
View Poll Results: The Shining: USA/Uncut vs UK/Cut | |||
USA/Uncut |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
51 | 77.27% |
UK/ Cut |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 22.73% |
Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#7 |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]()
Weirdly for me being from the UK, I recorded the US cut from UK TV on VHS in the 80s. So when I got a "proper" VHS copy later on I was annoyed it was shorter. I imported the longer cut when the first batch of Kubricks came out on DVD around 1999.
It's my preferred cut as it was the one I watched the most back then. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]()
I've always liked The Shining, but I also thought it wasn't quite as great as it's made out to be. I finally saw the US cut about a year ago and it catapulted the film to masterpiece status for me. Better pacing and the sense of claustrophobia is heightened.
Found this: Quote:
Last edited by dallywhitty; 07-14-2017 at 12:30 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Blu-ray Count
|
![]()
USA/UNCUT. People claim the shorter version is more intense. I don't think so. I grew up with the shorter version and I always thought the movie was very good, but not a masterpiece. Then I saw the longer US Cut and suddenly it all clicked for me. The longer version is indeed a masterpiece and a masterclass in film making. It adds much more dread and the feel of isolation. Which makes the movie much more scary imo. Love the incredble slow-burn.
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | dallywhitty (11-08-2017), eiknarf (11-08-2017) |
![]() |
#15 |
Banned
|
![]()
I prefer the longer cut.
That being said, both edits are amazing films. And they each approach the viewer differently. I don't think one is really "better" than the other. They are both great, and both are fascinating and both are compelling. But yes, if you force me to choose one, I will choose the long cut. They are both great. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Banned
|
![]()
I dunno, the longer cut includes scenes that aren't necessary to the progression of the story and Kubrick saw that too. It's nice seeing Hallorann get on a plane and renting a snow mobile, but it really doesn't change anything. Neither does the doctor's visit, Jack's extra interview scene, the extended bar scene and Wendy running into a room full of skeletons. Wasn't the shorter cut Kubricks preferred version?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Expert Member
Mar 2018
|
![]()
Longer cut all the way. Can't say I agree with Kubrick on this one.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|