|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 | ![]() $101.99 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $124.99 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $23.79 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $33.49 | ![]() $22.96 | ![]() $134.99 4 hrs ago
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Oct 2006
|
![]()
I have a question about the blu-ray. The question doesent have anything to do with the subject of this thread, but i didnt want to create a new one.
My friend told me that blu-ray uses mpeg2 codec, but i have always thought it used vc1 like hd-dvd does. As i understand it vc1 is better than mpeg2 because obviously mpeg2 is a lot older codec. This combined with the fact that many hd-dvd movies are getting better review from picture quality, does this mean that hd-dvd:s will always have better picture quality than blu-ray? or will blu-ray change codec at some point. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Nov 2006
|
![]()
Not an expert on this but as far as I know the initial batch of Blu-Ray movie are all encoded using mpeg2 and most since then now use one of the two newer codecs, VC1 or H.264/AVC.
I might add that I am quite impressed with the picture quality of H.264 videos that I play on my iPod. Despite having a low resolution they come up half decent on my 17" CRT. JB |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Active Member
Nov 2006
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Oct 2006
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Active Member
Nov 2006
|
![]()
Old isn't necessarily crap. Depending on who you speak to, it could also be described as mature. Mission Impossible (if i'm not mistaken) is one unique title where the studio had decided to release as mpeg2 on Blu-ray, and VC-1 on HD-DVD, and the image qualities are comparable (some might argue that the mpeg2 turned out better).
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Oct 2006
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Active Member
Nov 2006
|
![]()
I do not know how there can be an "average" of reviews. If one is happy to consider the recent reviews, then blu-ray no longer seems to be disadvantaged.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Super Moderator
|
![]()
There is an addition to MPEG2 for HD (and that is new, well as new as the other codecs). MPEG2 is the least compressed so uses much more disc space. General rule of thumb, the less compression the better, however not always the case, especially if sacrificing bandwidth. HD-DVD will be very reluctant to use MPEG2 as space is an issue, many of the movies they have released are using up most of the disc and the epics haven't even been announced e.g. Ben Hur, Gone with the Wind etc, with high compression on Blu Ray will be tight, I think it's going to be a disc swap for HD-DVD. Once HD-DVD dies an untimely death, this will be next battle ground for arguments, which is the better codec.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Site Manager
|
![]()
Tomokka: Both High Definition disc formats can use MPEG-2, VC-1, and AVC.
AVC is the same thing as MPEG 4 Part 10 which is the same thing as H.264 (It's called different by different organizations) (Like Apple's FireWire is called i.Link by Sony and IEEE 3994 in the Windows world) (Don't "cornfuze" MPEG-4 Part 10/AVC/H.264 with the earlier MPEG-4 Part 2) Both AVC and VC-1 are advanced codecs that I think evolved from mpeg4 roots (VC-1 from the WM9 variation of doing it, and I think that you'd have to pay a fee to MS to use it on a disc, and for the MPEGs you'd pay the MPEG/LA group) Advanced codecs have more features and of course they are supposed to be more efficient at shrinking the file size than MPEG-2 (Meaning they can give equivalent quality at smaller file sizes) As Blue mentions, there's also various "levels" of the codecs, (like H.264 level 4, level 4.1, level 4.2 etc) those levels increase resolution (some levels go beyond 1080p up to the highest film scanning resolutions), frame rate (things like 60p ![]() I don't have extensive experience watching HD-DVDs but I've seen good looking transfers and bad looking transfers. The good looking ones had higher VC-1 bitrates and the bad ones had lower VC-1 bitrates ( ![]() ![]() ![]() One of the best "transfers" I've seen is the Aladdin/Hitchikers/Flightplan/Narnia Pioneer BD player demo. Recently I've seen the Fox demo/trailer thing, and in it particulary Walk The Line looked amazing. Don't know what's the bitrate or codec on those (The Kingdom of Heaven section stated MPEG-2) but if they are all MPEG-2 I'd probably feel woozy ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
What codec will be used ? | Audio Theory and Discussion | Crispy | 4 | 02-01-2010 01:30 AM |
Video Codec Question | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | TenaciousDHo | 5 | 08-01-2009 12:58 PM |
Lets hear it... | Home Theater General Discussion | kusutare | 2 | 04-24-2007 04:20 PM |
|
|