|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best PS3 Game Deals
|
Best PS3 Game Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $15.05 | ![]() $14.99 | ![]() $39.96 | ![]() $30.96 | ![]() $69.97 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $19.70 | ![]() $26.03 | ![]() $16.88 | ![]() $39.80 | ![]() $59.95 | ![]() $39.99 | ![]() $39.95 |
|
View Poll Results: Dynamic in-game adds are | |||
a great idea because it helps keep the PSN service Free for the gamer. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
39 | 82.98% |
a dumb idea. I'd rather pay for the PSN sevice than have to see adds. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 17.02% |
Voters: 47. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
|
![]()
Sony will be incorporating Dynamic In-Game ads on PS3 games.
Sony has enlisted the marketing firm IGA Worldwide for the job of creating these adds. Also, IGA Worldwide is now the exclusive ad provider for all Electronic Arts games developed and published for the PS3. Don't jump to any crazy conclusions! There is a very good reason for Sony's decision to incorporate these adds. The adds cover the cost of the FREE PSN online service. I say, bring on the adds!!! I welcome them with open arms. I see this as a great trade. We get PSN service Free, they get to run ads. I'm fine with this decision. I knew it was coming back in 2006 when Sony announced that PSN would be Free. Very smart business decision. In a world where the corporation giants step on the consumer as if they were ants 99% of the time, this decision to run dynamic in-game adds is a decision I can be happy about because if favors the gamer. The bottom line is, it saves us money! What do you think? Last edited by superdynamite; 06-10-2008 at 03:58 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Banned
Mar 2008
|
![]()
I'll take the adds. I don't want to pay for the service. PS2 was $2 a year for online service. I can live with that. I dumped my XBL after I got my PS3 because of the monthly charge.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Active Member
|
![]()
I never payed a dime for ps2 SOCOM. is this something that was phased out?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
Also, in a way it doesn't matter, but if the loading screens start getting filled with advertisements I will not be happy. It will make me wonder if those load screens are necessary or just a way to provide ad space. Again, it all comes down to how they are used. If they suit the games environment, that is fine. If you happen upon a TV in a game and end up having to sit through a 30 second ad without being able to break out of it, that is not good. Likewise, fantasy settings really have little place for modern advertising. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Senior Member
Sep 2007
AZ
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
But what if there is a problem like if you're playing Madden online, your opponent is just 2 points up with seconds left on the clock and you're going for a field goal. Just when your about to hit it...an ad similar to those on IGN pops up. You miss your field goal, and your opponent has a field day. If in game pop ups ever happen, I will never play online again. Well thats just how I picture it, I hope I don't give any games publishers trolling the forum any ideas.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
The Busey
|
![]()
I'm not too sure why everyone is complaining. They aren't charging you to update your system or play online.
The only things they are charging you for is stuff that didn't come with your purchases. Heck, they are even offering you free stuff that you don't even have to pay for such as demos and trailers. They sent out an update for my GTAIV and I didn't have to pay for it other than my cable bill which didn't change because I got it. My point is that they aren't charging you for stuff that is required to play these games so why complain that you aren't getting stuff that you didn't pay for? As a lot of people that live on their own realize that everything in this world eventually comes with a price tag, so it will not be a huge shocker if one day they start charging us to use the PSN because after all it is a business. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Blu-ray Samurai
Sep 2007
Vegas Baby, Vegas
|
![]()
If the ads are "product placement," I don't mind. If they are intrusive, I do.
As to paying for PSN, I don't care. I pay about $4 a month for XBL, which is nothing. That's not even one gallon of gas where I live. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Feb 2008
Texas
|
![]()
Wow. How did this thread end up in a debate over English, grammar and math? HAHA.
Anyway...if the ads are on big billboards and banners or something while your running around Home, that's fine. Prototype, I believe, is supposed to have giant real-world billboards. Not a problem. Like was stated earlier, as long as there are no non-skip able videos when you log into basic functions, it should be ok. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Banned
Mar 2008
PSN ID- damreg1022
|
![]()
exactly. Why the F would you want to have ads ruin your game experience? Just Sonybots who like the idea. If it was anyone else, they would be laughing and making fun of it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Super Moderator
|
![]()
Nobody's saying they want ads to ruin their game experience.
No more arguing, silly namecalling, any of it. Including this. Games with a particular theme like ICO or Shadow of the Colossus will likely never incorporate ads. Games like Burnout show ads on in-game billboards which makes perfect sense as long as they're tasteful. The ads in a game like Free Realms (Sony Online Entertainment) are more regular and intrusive because the game is given away totally for free. Last edited by Shin-Ra; 06-08-2008 at 02:25 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
A good example would be this: Network TV you receive free over the air, and has commercials. Pay Channels like HBO which you specifically pay a monthly fee for doesn't have commercials. They are just moving that form of advertisement into gaming, which they are finally realizing is becoming a large part of peoples lives. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Power Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Power Member
|
![]()
If the ads are what people believe them to be, just In game Banners and Billboards, or maybe print ads during Loading would be ok. As long as it's not having to watch a whole advertisement before loading up the PS Store or anything like that. Anyways, it's not like we can really do anything about it, the amount of people that would be turned off of using the Store probably wouldn't equal the amount of money they make from the ads
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
Since the ads are dynamic I highly doubt we'll see them during load time. That would be almost impossible since they're dynamic. They could be shown on the stadium jumbo-tron. That would be able to hold a dynamic ad. Last edited by superdynamite; 06-10-2008 at 03:58 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Banned
|
![]()
If it keeps PSN FREE, I'm all for Dynamic Ads.
Last edited by superdynamite; 06-10-2008 at 03:58 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Banned
Feb 2008
|
![]()
M$ runs adds and still charges for the XBL service. This is were I think Sony has the advantage. I love PSN and I especially love that it is free.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
I vote c, having real ads in appropriate places adds a extra level of realism.. by the way ads is spelled ad not add and, that concludes another episode of "Spelling Police"
Char Aznable: One does not care to remember the mistakes of one's youth. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
What is your main reason for owning a PS3? | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | GOAT | 49 | 12-28-2009 07:00 PM |
Sony adds YouTube upload support to PS3 SDK! | PS3 | Shin-Ra | 25 | 05-16-2008 02:10 PM |
PS3 SD DVD scaler adds bad edge enhancement | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | faux123 | 7 | 04-27-2008 01:29 AM |
|
|