|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $68.47 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.49 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $26.59 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $49.99 | ![]() $14.49 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $36.69 | ![]() $29.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $31.99 | ![]() $34.96 | ![]() $54.45 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.49 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $86.13 |
![]() |
#1 |
Active Member
|
![]()
I know test patterns are important when setting brightness and contrast but I am wondering if using actual material also matters. I was using the monster isf calibration disc just to see how it compares to the DVE and I noticed something.
I lose detail when I set the brightness and contrast based on DVE test patterns compared to using the actual examples used on monster disc ie when I lower my contrast I see more details (creases) on the white shirt. The same goes for brightness, I have it set based on my test pattern but when I raise it a bit I can see more detail between a man wearing a black suit with a black shirt (see the collar better)in the test pattern. I would like to know people's thoughts about this. Is the test pattern the way to go? Obviously you dont base your calibration settings on film to film but I guess compared to the monster isf examples. ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
ISF calibration | Display Theory and Discussion | zoso0928 | 23 | 06-25-2009 02:19 AM |
isf calibration | Display Theory and Discussion | dtowntke | 15 | 01-12-2009 05:36 PM |
ISF Calibration Confusion?!?!?! | Display Theory and Discussion | backtothecanvas | 20 | 08-15-2008 10:03 PM |
ISF calibration. Is it worth it? | Home Theater General Discussion | Blu Tiger | 27 | 05-20-2007 01:19 PM |
ISF Calibration | Home Theater General Discussion | Heresy | 5 | 02-24-2007 12:07 AM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|