|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 21 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.49 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $33.49 16 hrs ago
| ![]() $11.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.99 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $99.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $35.33 |
![]() |
#1 |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]()
Interesting article from Newsweek about the use of 3D in upcoming movies. I'll post the text below.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/178815/page/1 I think Katzenberg is a little too optimistic about it's use, but it's certainly a lot cooler now than the old 3D. Last edited by toef; 01-13-2009 at 08:54 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Active Member
Apr 2008
Maryland
|
![]()
They have to think of a way so that I can enjoy a 3D movie without wearing those stupid glasses.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Special Member
![]() Feb 2008
Region B
|
![]()
That can't be true. The human eye can see more than 1080p. Especially more than 800p (which is around what most movies really are on Blu-ray).
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]() Quote:
I was hoping to catch U23D at the local IMAX when it was playing, but never got around to it. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]() Quote:
In an age where Hollywood is really starting to push 3D, you'd think a decision like this would be highly frowned on. So who do you side with...Fox or the theaters? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Blu-ray Count
|
![]()
I side with the theaters since they already are hardly making any money off the movie itself. The theaters are already spending hundreds of thousands of dollars equipping their projectors for 3D and if more studios start trying to make the theaters provide the 3D glasses theaters that haven't converted to 3D (currently around 80% of theaters) may decide that they will never recoup their investment and not upgrade.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
If the movie theaters have to pay for the glasses which the shouldn't have to anyway then its will be pass on to public which doesn't make any sense, the studio is just shooting themselves in the foot..
Its already expensive for a family to goto the movies. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
I'm not sure who I'm with. I know theatres don't make much on the movies themselves, but the theatres where I live charge more to go to a 3D movie
Since I can't think of a good reason it costs more, than they probably should be forking out the bill. On the other hand, since Fox is choosing to make the movie in 3D, part of that choice should include the cost of providing the theatres with glasses. Any way they can do something like with Imax 3D and just reuse the glasses? |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
the 3d movies are already more to watch...MvA was 3 dollars more to watch in 3D than 2D so passing 3d glasses cost along is insane. We pay enough for tickets and food fare already all be dammed if i have to pay for glasses too...however we did keep our glasses from MvA so for me its a mute point as we have our own now and i guess i will put them away for safe keeping that way we won't have to pay if the studio's force that on the theaters and the public...
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]()
To me, it is the similar to the idea for an IMAX movie. Since Hollywood makes a movie for the IMAX, they should not have to provide an IMAX theater to every theater that wants to show the movie. Instead those who have already built and purchased an IMAX theater will get an IMAX version. Likewise, if a theater wants 3-D, they should pay for the glasses. I side with the theaters on this one.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Expert Member
Dec 2008
|
![]()
How does Fox know how many glasses to provide if they are to provide them? Wouldn't that number be dependent on the actual success of the movie? I think the theater should bear the cost of the glasses, they charge more for the 3D version as mentioned previously, and if that doesn't include the cost of the glasses then they can tack that on as well, but allow the movie-goer to bring their own glasses to avoid that cost. I am sure if the theater charges for the glasses they will have a hefty markup on them and be able to recoup all costs easily. They are recylcing the glasses at my theater so they might need to provide a deposit return for people that don't want to keep the glasses for viewing the next 3D movie.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Blu-ray Archduke
|
![]()
fox is a d***
and that is totally ignoring their other faults they should pay for the glasses without question especially since the movie being in 3D was their decision 1million (like it says) for something like ice age is chump change and if the 3D gets good word of mouth it will bring in even more viewers and make their 1million back 100fold count me on the theaters side ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
The Future of Movies: 3-D or IMAX | Movie Polls | Jsheth | 65 | 06-10-2013 04:29 AM |
Future Paramount Movies..... | Wish Lists | ahoward1126 | 22 | 09-13-2009 04:10 PM |
top 4 future paramount movies | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | magic blu-ray | 51 | 02-22-2008 05:48 AM |
BD - The Future Of Movies | Blu-ray Movies - North America | DrinkMore | 9 | 05-17-2007 08:56 PM |
BR Movies - Future Prices? | Blu-ray Movies - North America | kilofox | 13 | 03-06-2007 08:04 AM |
|
|