|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $35.99 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $33.49 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.49 19 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $34.99 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $11.99 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.33 | ![]() $35.99 15 hrs ago
|
![]() |
#1 |
Special Member
|
![]()
I've done my share of looking at Blu-ray.com's Blu-ray reviews and their screenshot galleries, and I'm just wondering who does, and what criteria do these people use to determine what a good screenshot is?
Because I notice that very seldomly do they show what I, myself, would take a screenshot of. Most of the time, they're screenshots of faces or similar items. So what I'm saying can be pretty much summed up with the recent review of Minority Report. Screenshot gallery. I mean, with all the interesting imagery in that movie we get these 10 non-descript screens that show absolutely nothing really interesting. And don't tell me face shots are important to show facial detail when the screenshots are .jpg compressed in the first place. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
So, like I said, because they are NOT a true representation of the true quality of the BD, why give us boring shots as examples? Out of all the interesting imagery in this film, like the futurisitic cityscapes, vehicles, etc. all we get is these boring face shots. It'd be like taking pictures at a NASAR race event and giving us a bunch of close-ups of average people in the inner field tailgating instead of the actual race cars. I'm just dying to see the Saving Private Ryan review where we get to see close-ups of Vin Diesel's mug. Yeah, forget all those glorious battle scenes, I wanna see Paul Giamonti's face. I guess it may come down to how people take pictures in general. You know, like those who always go on vacation and they take pictures of themselves rather than of the locales that they're actually at? Like "Here's me at the Grand Canyon" (where you are 80% of the picture and the Grand Canyon is a second thought.) My point is that there can be as much, if not more, detail in the surroundings in a picture (Blu-ray image) than there is on a close-up face shot. Last edited by Lincoln6Echo; 04-25-2010 at 11:49 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Active Member
|
![]()
Those images are just samples taken to show various scenes: face details, dark scenes, color, etc. The images could be taken randomly due to the chunk of reviews at hand, hence reviewers can't be too choosy. Besides, they are very subjective. What constitute "good" screenshots for one person might not be so good for another.
![]() As the disclaimer says they are not the actual representation of the actual film PQ. They are merely "give the viewer a general idea". Look at it this way: A review or report without a single screenshot/image/graph is really boring... ![]() Anyway, one can always read up the review for details & info on the film PQ & SQ. If need to, compare to another review for second opinion (for verification purpose). |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
So for my example of Minority report, I might have used one of the shots of Tom Cruise jumping from one of those tracked cars on the side of the building to another. Or one from the scene in the factory with the sonic gun. I think what I'm saying here, is that the reviewers and I have a completely different idea of what would make for good screenshots to show people what the BD's PQ looks like to some degree. And it relates to how different people take regular everyday photographs. For instance, I tend to hate pictures of people in those grouped "drunkin' party" shots. You know, the "girls gone wild" kind of shots. I tend to like photos of the surrounding environment with minimal persons in it. Now I realize that it is tough to get a clear still shot of a motion picture due to the motion blur in the frame-by-frame motion in the action, but subject matter should still be highly considered. Last edited by Lincoln6Echo; 04-26-2010 at 02:22 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Lincoln6Echo; 04-26-2010 at 07:44 PM. |
||
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Blu-ray user reviews versus editor reviews | Feedback Forum | Bk_Tan | 2 | 12-29-2009 03:55 PM |
Inconsistent Screenshots # in reviews of blu-ray.com | Feedback Forum | seigneur_rayden | 9 | 05-22-2009 05:56 PM |
Blu-ray Reviews and Screenshots | Feedback Forum | thekobrakais | 2 | 02-04-2009 03:22 PM |
What does Blu-ray.com use for the screenshots? | Feedback Forum | JeremyPiven | 61 | 08-14-2008 06:23 PM |
|
|