|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 | ![]() $101.99 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $124.99 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $134.99 56 min ago
| ![]() $39.95 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $33.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $23.79 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.96 |
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
Jan 2010
|
![]()
Just got it at Target for $14.99 and the PQ is not what I had in mind. The picture is a little fuzzy and not as sharp as I thought it would be. Wideshots are not very detailed at times. Checked the review on here and the PQ received a 3.5, I would rate it as a good 3.0, btw my TV is perfectly calibrated. Still felt that Universal would of worked a tad bit more on this great movie.
Anyone feel the same way about the PQ? |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Banned
Jan 2010
|
![]()
Ah. So that was R. Scott's intention? Of course it will not look any better than how it already looks, but the fuzzy look I wasn't digging. Dont get me wrong, there are some shots that look truly Blu-ray reference, mainly face close ups.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Active Member
Nov 2009
|
![]()
Considering you can get this used on DVD for next to nothing I would feel violated paying 15 bucks to say I got it on Blu. That's just me.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Moderator
|
![]() Quote:
I don't think it's a terrible looking Blu-ray either....... but The movie isn't for me......... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Active Member
Nov 2009
|
![]()
Close. Just OK ain't OK for me. I sprung for Blu prices on Lost and quite a few others but I am not buying marginal upgrades. Just not worth it for me some others don't mind spending what amounts to 5 times or more.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Banned
Jan 2010
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Moderator
|
![]()
ahh gonna say.... people in "lincolnview's" neck of the woods probably don't have electricity yet, let alone computers/internet
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Active Member
Nov 2009
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Banned
Jan 2010
|
![]()
Im not complaining that the PQ is terrible because is not. Just letdown that it looks the way it does, not what i expected really. But if its directors intention, I can totally live with it. Like some can't live with the fact that "300" is so grain heavy. Its beautiful the way it is. Grain sets the tone right for that type of film.
For $15 I think it was a good enough deal, its more expensive in Amazon. Now, if i had already viewed this disc before I would've probably not have bought at that price. I had waited for a $9.99 drop. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Super Moderator
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
If Blu-ray transfer is bad do you watch upconverted DVD? | Blu-ray Movies - North America | Miller Lite1 | 54 | 12-02-2009 06:03 AM |
how much of a difference is between upconverted dvd and hd on a 20" tv? | Display Theory and Discussion | coralfangs | 5 | 05-12-2008 03:48 PM |
Upconverted DVD | Newbie Discussion | Cinemaddict | 4 | 03-29-2008 06:21 PM |
Upconverted DVD Vs Blu-Ray - Difference On Screen Size | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | Merc1785 | 9 | 01-30-2008 01:08 PM |
|
|