As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
2 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 day ago
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.13
 
The Conjuring 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.13
18 hrs ago
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
Casper 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.57
18 hrs ago
Dan Curtis' Classic Monsters (Blu-ray)
$29.99
1 day ago
Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)
$30.48
1 day ago
Jurassic World: 7-Movie Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$99.99
5 hrs ago
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
House Party 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Players and Recorders
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-22-2007, 02:12 PM   #1
Marlon Marlon is offline
Banned
 
Jul 2007
Default criticism of PS3 as a blu-ray player

Blu-ray is now truly blessed with films of the utmost transfer quality and the two films I'll be using for testing purposes will be 'Eight Below' and 'Flightplan'. Also I'll be comparing the PS3 to the reigning bluray champion which is, of course, the elite Pioneer BDP-94HD (or as its known in Australia LX-70). Needless to say I own both machines as well as the sammy BDP-1000, which is not really worth bothering about.

Firstly, as I watched these two films on my pioneer, I was struck just how, on the whole, remarkably pure, grain free and pristine these films looked. It was just beautiful. I mean seriously beautiful to watch. I might also add that the pioneer also showed up just how artificial and superimposed the grain effect looked in the otherwise splendid movie '300'. The only other way I can describe the aforementioned movies is that they are of a crystaline beauty in terms of presentation, but as I learned, the better the setup then so much better will be results.

I thought that it would be interesting to compare the PS3 bluray performance with the pioneer with respect to these two films. If you're already getting that sinking feel, then I can tell you it'll only get worse. Anyway I'll cut straight to the chase.

1.) Compared to the pioneer the COLOURS rendered by the PS3 are manifestly inferior and the skins tones are especially bad, really BAD. Actually the PS3 made the actors look rather ashen or sallow or pasty (you can take your pick). I really couldn't watch those films any further and the pioneer's rendering quality is just incomparably better.

2.) The CONTRAST of the PS3 is again very inferior to the pioneer and as a consequence the PS3 picture quality lost a lot of vividness. I found the PS3's picture quality looking quite dim and dull in comparison to the pioneer.

3.) The PS3 suffers from GRAINESS where the pioneer has the barest minimum or none at all. This was the most suprising find of the test and I can say that never will the PS3 touch the pristine rendering qualities of the pioneer. The grainy performance of the PS3 spoilt the movies for me and in particular the many close ups in 'flight plan'.

The main purpose of this post is not to bash the PS3 which I really love as a gaming platform, but to report to you the differences between it and a truly great stand alone machine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 02:20 PM   #2
Iceman_II Iceman_II is offline
Expert Member
 
Jan 2007
Ft. Worth
2
308
4
Default

Interesting that your review is pretty much 180 degrees out from just about every other review I have read. Maybe you have a bad PS3.

I find it hard to believe that while nearly every other review I have read says that the output of the PS3 is either close to or as good as various standalones, your review comes back with saying skin tones are "ashen" and "sallow" and the picture is "grainy"

Did you recalibrate the monitor separately for the PS3 and the Pioneer, or did you use the "one setting fits all" theory.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 02:34 PM   #3
partridge partridge is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
partridge's Avatar
 
Oct 2005
England
Default

I use my PS3 as a blu-ray and upscaling DVD player. I have no complaints at all on picture quality. Fair enough I don't have access to any standalone players, but when magazines give the PS3 9/10 for its playback performance I have to question your findings.

The blu-ray movie side of the PS3 is absolutely what it was designed to be; a showcase for blu-ray, unlike the PS2 which was in no way a showcase player for DVD.

Appreciate your opinions, but to make the claims you've made you must have a faulty PS3; my playback is bright, vibrant and damn near perfect. I'm sure there are better standalone players, but there's no way they would make the PS3 look as bad as you suggest.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 02:43 PM   #4
Marlon Marlon is offline
Banned
 
Jul 2007
Default PS3 is working perfectly well

I'm just reporting the god honest truth. The calibrations are the same for both machines and there is nothing wrong with my PS3. Owning a larger 46 inch sony 1080p lcd tv, the differences may be more readily seen than on smaller tvs. I'll have to respectfully disagree that the PS3 is any where near as good as the pioneer, in fact I thought the samsung had better PQ because it had better contrast and more vividness to the colours. The PS3 can't do proper skin tones because the colours are duller and muted and its contrast levels are, incomparison, quite bad. If you have just made the jump from DVD to PS3 bluray, then the PS3 will look flawless but its an average player, merely adequate, in comparison to the pioneer.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 02:43 PM   #5
Smackos Smackos is offline
Senior Member
 
Jun 2007
149
1
8
Default

What are you using to connect up to your display with each player?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 02:45 PM   #6
NutsAboutPS3 NutsAboutPS3 is offline
Expert Member
 
NutsAboutPS3's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
UK
1
Default

How are your players connected to the tv? If via HDMI I find it hard to understand how the colours and contrast can differ - surely it simply reads the values from the disc (albeit after decrypting and decoding) and sends them out via HDMI, as it's all digital I would expect any player to output the same colours?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 02:47 PM   #7
dialog_gvf dialog_gvf is offline
Moderator
 
dialog_gvf's Avatar
 
Nov 2006
Toronto
320
Default

Many intelligent people with spectacular HT systems use PS/3s.
Many of the professional disc reviewers use PS/3s.

I have definitely heard that the Pioneer Elite picture is superior. But, then I would not only expect that, I would absolutely demand it. It would be a complete embarassment if it weren't true.

But, is the difference worth the cost difference, and the lack of Profile 1.1 and 2.0 compatibility?

Now, as for grain. Does that indicate some sort of grain suppression filtering on the Elite? That would be positive for many, although it does mean the picture is being altered from the reality on the disc.

Gary
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 02:52 PM   #8
Marlon Marlon is offline
Banned
 
Jul 2007
Default Tv has 2 HDMI inputs......

The sony 46 incher has 2 hdmi inputs and I've got them both connected with a high end nordost cables (with silver conductors, triple shielding, so on and so forth) which perform really well, much more so than a standard cable.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 02:55 PM   #9
Iceman_II Iceman_II is offline
Expert Member
 
Jan 2007
Ft. Worth
2
308
4
Default

We have found the problem!

You say that you used the same calibrations for both machines... if your calibrations were optimized for the pioneer, the PS3s performance would suffer, and vice versa. If one set of calibrations fit all, then all TVs would come from the factory preset, and you would never need to adjust.

Before you get all pompus over your 46" set, my PS3 looks OUTSTANDING on my 60" Sony, lots of POP and many "3d effects" (depending on the source).

I am sure that the picture on the pioneer is probably a bit better, it had better be for the price premium you have to pay... but your "review" if thats what we are calling it, portrays the PS3 as a piece of garbage, and that it most definately is NOT.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 02:58 PM   #10
Smackos Smackos is offline
Senior Member
 
Jun 2007
149
1
8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlon View Post
The sony 46 incher has 2 hdmi inputs and I've got them both connected with a high end nordost cables (with silver conductors, triple shielding, so on and so forth) which perform really well, much more so than a standard cable.
Yeah very nice, have seen them. I won't even ask how much they've set you back..

Am very suprised by your results though to be honest. Did think that there'd be a slight improvement at non-viewing distances (like 3 inches from the screen, that sort of thing) but for you to say that it's pretty obvious is quite astounding. Like everyone else here I'm really happy by the performance given of my PS3 for PQ against the standalones it's not fell short so far. Either way fair play to ya buddy.. enjoy what ya got either way..know I am
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 02:59 PM   #11
wem003 wem003 is offline
Active Member
 
wem003's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Apex, NC
29
1
Default

Not being ugly - but it just seems like your post is about justifying audiophile level purchases.

I was open to the discussion, but after telling us about your great display, great player, great cables, etc... just doesn't match what I have experienced with this machine.

I haven't tested other blu-ray players, but I have had several upconverting DVD players and this is the best I've seen.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 03:06 PM   #12
Marlon Marlon is offline
Banned
 
Jul 2007
Default There is no problem with the settings

How can I make a fair comparison if I have one set of conditions for the one machine and another set for the other machine? There is no common ground to then make a comparison. I've set up the tv to my liking, which DOESN'T FAVOUR one machine or the other, and only then I made a fair comparison. Of course I'm not saying the PS3 is 'garbage' its terrific. If you just made the jump from DVD it'll then appear to be flawless.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 03:31 PM   #13
Iceman_II Iceman_II is offline
Expert Member
 
Jan 2007
Ft. Worth
2
308
4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlon View Post
How can I make a fair comparison if I have one set of conditions for the one machine and another set for the other machine? There is no common ground to then make a comparison. .
That statement alone tells me that you know not of what you speak.

The question is how can you expect two different companies to have two different machines to output EXACTLY the same hue/saturation/sharpness levels. It isn't about having "common ground" as you say, its about correctly calibrating the video to account for differing outputs from two different pieces of equipment, thereby putting them on an even footing. Any piece of equipment can be made to look like crap if the calibration is off, and if those settings "HAPPEN" to be optimal for another piece of equipment, then one could draw the conclusion that one is far better than the other.

When tests are set up for reputable reviews, the systems are usually calibrated, otherwise, the results are simply subjective and meaningless.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 03:33 PM   #14
cawgijoe cawgijoe is offline
Special Member
 
Feb 2007
1
Default

No issues with my PS3. The PQ is top-notch.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 03:49 PM   #15
SGIBES SGIBES is offline
Senior Member
 
SGIBES's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
Chicago IL
1
Default

That is just not true, IMO anyway, are you sure you dont work for Pioneer or in retail trying to sell their players?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 04:07 PM   #16
petethebaker petethebaker is offline
Member
 
Feb 2007
232
935
1
226
Default

I do not know how you base your opinion but my ps3 has an incredible picture on my hitachi 51 hd. Really you must have a bad machi ne or your calibrations are wrong.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 04:08 PM   #17
ack_bak ack_bak is offline
Power Member
 
Mar 2007
181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceman_II View Post
That statement alone tells me that you know not of what you speak.

The question is how can you expect two different companies to have two different machines to output EXACTLY the same hue/saturation/sharpness levels. It isn't about having "common ground" as you say, its about correctly calibrating the video to account for differing outputs from two different pieces of equipment, thereby putting them on an even footing. Any piece of equipment can be made to look like crap if the calibration is off, and if those settings "HAPPEN" to be optimal for another piece of equipment, then one could draw the conclusion that one is far better than the other.

When tests are set up for reputable reviews, the systems are usually calibrated, otherwise, the results are simply subjective and meaningless.
Agree with Iceman. You should calibrate both HDMI sources individually. It really sounds to me like you calibration is off for the PS3. I own a Samsung standalone player and a PS3 and the PS3 looks sharper to me than the Samsung using the same movies as a reference (and it is ever so slight).
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 04:14 PM   #18
Icemage Icemage is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Jul 2007
Default

One quick question: Have you updated your PS3 firmware and set the HDMI RGB output to Full? If you haven't, that might be what's causing your washed out colors. Should also check the other calibration settings and report them here.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 04:16 PM   #19
bryaaaant bryaaaant is offline
Active Member
 
Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icemage View Post
One quick question: Have you updated your PS3 firmware and set the HDMI RGB output to Full? If you haven't, that might be what's causing your washed out colors. Should also check the other calibration settings and report them here.
just found that option a couple days ago and wow - made a huge difference.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 04:19 PM   #20
CptGreedle CptGreedle is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
CptGreedle's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Sworn super-hero now services Atlanta (and suburbs).
128
5
Send a message via AIM to CptGreedle
Default

It could be something set wrong, it could be a bad PS3. But there is no reason a PS3 should have worse quality than a stand alone player. The thing is built like a tank and is more powerful than my computer. It should be able to give you the best quality available.
As they said, make sure the setting on the PS3 is at "RGB output FULL". It makes a big difference.
Otherwise, see if an exchange will fix it.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Players and Recorders

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Is PS3 Still The Best Blu-ray Player?? Blu-ray Players and Recorders blurayjunkie 191 07-05-2010 03:19 PM
New PS3 article mentions that the PS3 is still the best BLU-RAY player overall. Blu-ray Players and Recorders HDTV1080P 5 04-13-2008 03:51 AM
Ps3 Or Blu-ray Player???? Blu-ray Players and Recorders TheNatureBhoy 5 09-18-2007 09:55 PM
Follow up post:Vindicating the 'criticism of PS3' post Blu-ray Players and Recorders Marlon 17 08-27-2007 03:45 PM
What is wattage of Sony PS3 as Blu-Ray player vs. other Blu-Ray Players? Blu-ray Players and Recorders markw 2 05-02-2007 02:16 AM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:20 AM.