|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $24.96 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $27.13 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $27.57 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $30.48 1 day ago
| ![]() $99.99 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $34.99 |
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
Jul 2007
|
![]()
Blu-ray is now truly blessed with films of the utmost transfer quality and the two films I'll be using for testing purposes will be 'Eight Below' and 'Flightplan'. Also I'll be comparing the PS3 to the reigning bluray champion which is, of course, the elite Pioneer BDP-94HD (or as its known in Australia LX-70). Needless to say I own both machines as well as the sammy BDP-1000, which is not really worth bothering about.
Firstly, as I watched these two films on my pioneer, I was struck just how, on the whole, remarkably pure, grain free and pristine these films looked. It was just beautiful. I mean seriously beautiful to watch. I might also add that the pioneer also showed up just how artificial and superimposed the grain effect looked in the otherwise splendid movie '300'. The only other way I can describe the aforementioned movies is that they are of a crystaline beauty in terms of presentation, but as I learned, the better the setup then so much better will be results. I thought that it would be interesting to compare the PS3 bluray performance with the pioneer with respect to these two films. If you're already getting that sinking feel, then I can tell you it'll only get worse. Anyway I'll cut straight to the chase. 1.) Compared to the pioneer the COLOURS rendered by the PS3 are manifestly inferior and the skins tones are especially bad, really BAD. Actually the PS3 made the actors look rather ashen or sallow or pasty (you can take your pick). I really couldn't watch those films any further and the pioneer's rendering quality is just incomparably better. 2.) The CONTRAST of the PS3 is again very inferior to the pioneer and as a consequence the PS3 picture quality lost a lot of vividness. I found the PS3's picture quality looking quite dim and dull in comparison to the pioneer. 3.) The PS3 suffers from GRAINESS where the pioneer has the barest minimum or none at all. This was the most suprising find of the test and I can say that never will the PS3 touch the pristine rendering qualities of the pioneer. The grainy performance of the PS3 spoilt the movies for me and in particular the many close ups in 'flight plan'. The main purpose of this post is not to bash the PS3 which I really love as a gaming platform, but to report to you the differences between it and a truly great stand alone machine. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Expert Member
|
![]()
Interesting that your review is pretty much 180 degrees out from just about every other review I have read. Maybe you have a bad PS3.
I find it hard to believe that while nearly every other review I have read says that the output of the PS3 is either close to or as good as various standalones, your review comes back with saying skin tones are "ashen" and "sallow" and the picture is "grainy" Did you recalibrate the monitor separately for the PS3 and the Pioneer, or did you use the "one setting fits all" theory. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Blu-ray Ninja
Oct 2005
England
|
![]()
I use my PS3 as a blu-ray and upscaling DVD player. I have no complaints at all on picture quality. Fair enough I don't have access to any standalone players, but when magazines give the PS3 9/10 for its playback performance I have to question your findings.
The blu-ray movie side of the PS3 is absolutely what it was designed to be; a showcase for blu-ray, unlike the PS2 which was in no way a showcase player for DVD. Appreciate your opinions, but to make the claims you've made you must have a faulty PS3; my playback is bright, vibrant and damn near perfect. I'm sure there are better standalone players, but there's no way they would make the PS3 look as bad as you suggest. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Banned
Jul 2007
|
![]()
I'm just reporting the god honest truth. The calibrations are the same for both machines and there is nothing wrong with my PS3. Owning a larger 46 inch sony 1080p lcd tv, the differences may be more readily seen than on smaller tvs. I'll have to respectfully disagree that the PS3 is any where near as good as the pioneer, in fact I thought the samsung had better PQ because it had better contrast and more vividness to the colours. The PS3 can't do proper skin tones because the colours are duller and muted and its contrast levels are, incomparison, quite bad. If you have just made the jump from DVD to PS3 bluray, then the PS3 will look flawless but its an average player, merely adequate, in comparison to the pioneer.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Expert Member
|
![]()
How are your players connected to the tv? If via HDMI I find it hard to understand how the colours and contrast can differ - surely it simply reads the values from the disc (albeit after decrypting and decoding) and sends them out via HDMI, as it's all digital I would expect any player to output the same colours?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Moderator
|
![]()
Many intelligent people with spectacular HT systems use PS/3s.
Many of the professional disc reviewers use PS/3s. I have definitely heard that the Pioneer Elite picture is superior. But, then I would not only expect that, I would absolutely demand it. It would be a complete embarassment if it weren't true. But, is the difference worth the cost difference, and the lack of Profile 1.1 and 2.0 compatibility? Now, as for grain. Does that indicate some sort of grain suppression filtering on the Elite? That would be positive for many, although it does mean the picture is being altered from the reality on the disc. Gary |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Banned
Jul 2007
|
![]()
The sony 46 incher has 2 hdmi inputs and I've got them both connected with a high end nordost cables (with silver conductors, triple shielding, so on and so forth) which perform really well, much more so than a standard cable.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Expert Member
|
![]()
We have found the problem!
You say that you used the same calibrations for both machines... if your calibrations were optimized for the pioneer, the PS3s performance would suffer, and vice versa. If one set of calibrations fit all, then all TVs would come from the factory preset, and you would never need to adjust. Before you get all pompus over your 46" set, my PS3 looks OUTSTANDING on my 60" Sony, lots of POP and many "3d effects" (depending on the source). I am sure that the picture on the pioneer is probably a bit better, it had better be for the price premium you have to pay... but your "review" if thats what we are calling it, portrays the PS3 as a piece of garbage, and that it most definately is NOT. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Am very suprised by your results though to be honest. Did think that there'd be a slight improvement at non-viewing distances (like 3 inches from the screen, that sort of thing) but for you to say that it's pretty obvious is quite astounding. Like everyone else here I'm really happy by the performance given of my PS3 for PQ against the standalones it's not fell short so far. Either way fair play to ya buddy.. enjoy what ya got either way..know I am ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Active Member
|
![]()
Not being ugly - but it just seems like your post is about justifying audiophile level purchases.
I was open to the discussion, but after telling us about your great display, great player, great cables, etc... just doesn't match what I have experienced with this machine. I haven't tested other blu-ray players, but I have had several upconverting DVD players and this is the best I've seen. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Banned
Jul 2007
|
![]()
How can I make a fair comparison if I have one set of conditions for the one machine and another set for the other machine? There is no common ground to then make a comparison. I've set up the tv to my liking, which DOESN'T FAVOUR one machine or the other, and only then I made a fair comparison. Of course I'm not saying the PS3 is 'garbage' its terrific. If you just made the jump from DVD it'll then appear to be flawless.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Expert Member
|
![]() Quote:
The question is how can you expect two different companies to have two different machines to output EXACTLY the same hue/saturation/sharpness levels. It isn't about having "common ground" as you say, its about correctly calibrating the video to account for differing outputs from two different pieces of equipment, thereby putting them on an even footing. Any piece of equipment can be made to look like crap if the calibration is off, and if those settings "HAPPEN" to be optimal for another piece of equipment, then one could draw the conclusion that one is far better than the other. When tests are set up for reputable reviews, the systems are usually calibrated, otherwise, the results are simply subjective and meaningless. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Power Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Blu-ray Ninja
![]() Jul 2007
|
![]()
One quick question: Have you updated your PS3 firmware and set the HDMI RGB output to Full? If you haven't, that might be what's causing your washed out colors. Should also check the other calibration settings and report them here.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Active Member
Aug 2007
|
![]()
just found that option a couple days ago and wow - made a huge difference.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
It could be something set wrong, it could be a bad PS3. But there is no reason a PS3 should have worse quality than a stand alone player. The thing is built like a tank and is more powerful than my computer. It should be able to give you the best quality available.
As they said, make sure the setting on the PS3 is at "RGB output FULL". It makes a big difference. Otherwise, see if an exchange will fix it. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Is PS3 Still The Best Blu-ray Player?? | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | blurayjunkie | 191 | 07-05-2010 03:19 PM |
New PS3 article mentions that the PS3 is still the best BLU-RAY player overall. | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | HDTV1080P | 5 | 04-13-2008 03:51 AM |
Ps3 Or Blu-ray Player???? | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | TheNatureBhoy | 5 | 09-18-2007 09:55 PM |
Follow up post:Vindicating the 'criticism of PS3' post | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | Marlon | 17 | 08-27-2007 03:45 PM |
What is wattage of Sony PS3 as Blu-Ray player vs. other Blu-Ray Players? | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | markw | 2 | 05-02-2007 02:16 AM |
|
|