Spider-man 1 & 2 single layer?

[BStecke]

Is this correct? Very surprising, if it is . . . they say both Spiderman 1 & 2 are BD-25's . . . kind of odd to me, but the reviews are good, so I guess it doesn't matter.

http://www.thedigitalbits.com/review...eviews009.html

[WickyWoo]

That would certainly explain the lack of PCM on the first 2

Doesn't look like it's hobbled them at all though

[Banjo]

I'm sure it'll still look great.

[Jack Torrance]

It's 50gb. Spider-Man 2 has seamless branching to incorporate the extended 2.1 version, so I would expect nothing less than this anyway:

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/movie...47&show=review

[Chad Varnadore]

Both films use dual layered discs. Bill must have made an assumption they're BD25s because the discs are featureless, assuming he knows how to tell the difference.

[BStecke]

Originally Posted by Chad Varnadore

Both films use dual layered discs. Bill must have made an assumption they're BD25s because the discs are featureless, assuming he knows how to tell the difference.

Bill Hunt isn't the reviewer, it's Greg Suarez.

[MOONPHASE]

dont foget 1 and 2 dont have the original extras to take up space on the disc

[Scorxpion]

Originally Posted by BStecke

Is this correct? Very surprising, if it is . . . they say both Spiderman 1 & 2 are BD-25's . . . kind of odd to me, but the reviews are good, so I guess it doesn't matter.

http://www.thedigitalbits.com/review...eviews009.html

His assumption is wrong according to many website reviewers ,thay are BD-50 DL,Nobody mentioned they are single layer for Both movies 1 and 2.