As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
22 hrs ago
The Howling 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
8 hrs ago
The Bone Collector 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
16 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 day ago
Death Wish 3 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
18 hrs ago
It's a Wonderful Life 4K (Blu-ray)
$11.99
4 hrs ago
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
Spotlight 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
14 hrs ago
Death Line 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
8 hrs ago
Jurassic World: 7-Movie Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$99.99
1 day ago
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.33
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Entertainment > General Chat
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-29-2008, 03:04 PM   #1
mikejet mikejet is offline
Banned
 
mikejet's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Los Angeles, CA
5
29
Default Why is Toshiba so anti Blu?

I understand that they lost and it's not their format but why is Toshiba so anti Blu still? I mean shouldn't they support the format that will endup the standard in maybe 10 years? Seriously come on. I mean Sony knew when to bite the bullet on Beta.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2008, 03:09 PM   #2
stockstar1138 stockstar1138 is offline
Banned
 
stockstar1138's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
Default

it has to do both with this gen and with last gen.

Toshiba holds the most patents for DVD technology. If they go and support blu, they are basically going to be supporting a format in which they have NO royalties whatsoever to takeover a format in which they have more royalties than any other company out there.

The more they support blu, the more money they lose from consumers turning away from DVD.

They have a very vested intrest in keeping DVD alive, while trying to promote random formats that might hurt blu from fully taking over the DVD market.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2008, 03:11 PM   #3
eChopper eChopper is offline
Expert Member
 
eChopper's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
21
74
2
Default

Jealousy
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2008, 03:14 PM   #4
jadedeath jadedeath is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
jadedeath's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
Default

Philistine Pig Ignorance?

Logan
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2008, 03:27 PM   #5
Elandyll Elandyll is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
Elandyll's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
MD
188
1
Default

I think it's a double thing.

On one hand, they receive a ton of royalties from the DVD patents (they even receive some from Blu Ray players sold, as they are DVD compatible).
so the longer the DVD is around, the better for them.
This being said, every Blu Ray player that sells that isn't a Mitsubishi player is also potential lost $$.

On the other hand, I am convinced they also do that out of spite.
Hence the research and Press releases that intend to minimise true HD, via their "it's almost as good as HD" SRT, XDE, and now the idiotic ramblings about SD cards replacing discs (right, when it obivously will never be as cheap to produce chip components rather than plastic layer based high replication capacity discs).
I do believe that rather than adopt the new standard and make money when it'll start replacing (in parts) DVD, they'd rather try to see it sink (not that it's going to happen, or that it would be thanks to them if it were to happen).
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2008, 03:27 PM   #6
Downhere Downhere is offline
Power Member
 
Downhere's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
Central Florida
444
2
8
Default

It's all business. There are still other companies who support Blu but haven't even put out a player yet, same with Toshiba (except they don't support Blu). Honestly, there are enough other companies that are making players so it's all good either way.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2008, 05:00 PM   #7
tron3 tron3 is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
tron3's Avatar
 
Aug 2004
New Jersey
3
Default

Toshiba is a barking dog. They had to buy exclusive studio support the first time out. Second time out most studios probably won't even listen to them. I would hope Paramount learned something from that PR debacle.

Any new format to follow is just repackaged blu-ray because it will all be high def. Change for the purpose of change will simply confuse the unwitting consumer and piss off the rest.

I said it here a few years ago, "don't piss off the consumer". Someone from Sony must browse this site because an article quoting a Sony rep said the same thing!

I even posted a thread on Sony extending an olive branch to Toshiba. Behold an article of that title appears and Sony did exactly as I suggested. Naturally, Tool-shiba shot down a white flag.

Now, are these both coincidences, or is Sony listening to the consumer? I say they listen to the consumer.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2008, 05:58 PM   #8
bluflu bluflu is offline
Special Member
 
bluflu's Avatar
 
Mar 2007
Default

In a word, money! Toshiba's cash cow is DVD. Fortunately Blu-ray doesn't need Toshiba now that Warner, Universal, and Paramount have seen the light.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2008, 08:58 PM   #9
EricJ EricJ is offline
Banned
 
Jul 2007
The Paradise of New England
6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tron3 View Post
Toshiba is a barking dog. They had to buy exclusive studio support the first time out. Second time out most studios probably won't even listen to them. I would hope Paramount learned something from that PR debacle.
Also...desperation has traumatized them into becoming gullible enough to actually BELIEVE half the cockamamie theories that Microsoft threw out to "strategically" sour-grapes the popularity of hard Blu disks--

They've already staked the company's future on downloads, upconverted-DVD and Smart Disk flash cards, and if MS told them that we'll someday watch movies on limburger cheese, they'd buy up three Wisconsin dairies...
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2008, 09:03 PM   #10
jadedeath jadedeath is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
jadedeath's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tron3 View Post
Now, are these both coincidences, or is Sony listening to the consumer? I say they listen to the consumer.
You would never hear some of the diehard leftover HD-DVD fans over on HDD admit that.

They'd think that Sony screwed them again for making Blu-Ray the only High Def format and that Toshiba hadn't suckered them.

Logan
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 12:26 AM   #11
Anthony P Anthony P is offline
Blu-ray Count
 
Jul 2007
Montreal, Canada
Default

Quote:
I understand that they lost and it's not their format but why is Toshiba so anti Blu still? I mean shouldn't they support the format that will endup the standard in maybe 10 years? Seriously come on. I mean Sony knew when to bite the bullet on Beta.
because it won't be in 10 years but in a couple of years. Toshiba was not ready to go past DVD they wanted to get their full 15-20 (?) years. But a few companies started BD and started selling recorders in Japan and they realised they where up the creek without a paddle and so threw together HD DVD hoping to stop the rush to a new format. The issue is that if BD takes hold and becomes the DVD replacement, the same way DVD replaced VHS, then they lose the DVD royalties and they can't introduce something new for the next 10-15 years (and maybe longer).


HD DVD was always just the initial volley (offensive) against BD getting established, it was no where strong enough to keep the war for a long stalemate (the way SACD/DVD-A where) that would have had HD disks dying by the time Toshiba would be ready with their new format.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 02:50 AM   #12
U4K61 U4K61 is offline
Special Member
 
U4K61's Avatar
 
Mar 2007
Connecticut
40
4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stockstar1138 View Post
it has to do both with this gen and with last gen.

Toshiba holds the most patents for DVD technology. If they go and support blu, they are basically going to be supporting a format in which they have NO royalties whatsoever to takeover a format in which they have more royalties than any other company out there.

The more they support blu, the more money they lose from consumers turning away from DVD.

They have a very vested intrest in keeping DVD alive, while trying to promote random formats that might hurt blu from fully taking over the DVD market.
Nothing like Toshiba's promise of up converting DVD to "Near HD Quality" to keep the horse they road in on alive and well. 480p Upconversion

Last edited by U4K61; 01-12-2010 at 04:26 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 03:18 AM   #13
Uxi Uxi is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Uxi's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Southern California
14
191
9
Default

two words: sour grapes
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 12:49 PM   #14
camper camper is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
camper's Avatar
 
Dec 2007
367
445
1
1
Default

The quicker Blu Ray overtakes DVD, the more royalty revenue Toshiba loses. It's an exceptionally simple concept--the longer DVD stays in the game the more money they bring in.

camper
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 12:55 PM   #15
tron3 tron3 is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
tron3's Avatar
 
Aug 2004
New Jersey
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jadedeath View Post
You would never hear some of the diehard leftover HD-DVD fans over on HDD admit that.

They'd think that Sony screwed them again for making Blu-Ray the only High Def format and that Toshiba hadn't suckered them.

Logan
George Carlin had a joke about how people talk about the deceased they did not like. "Yeah, he was an @$$hole. .....But a well meaning @$$hole."

In short, people who lie to themselves and each other don't change the truth. I think people realize I can be pursuasive and educational. But I also know when a person is just holding to an agenda. I simply click the ticker and yell, "NEXT!" People who refuse to learn are worse than those who can't learn because they limit their own potential.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 01:20 PM   #16
fighthefutureofhd fighthefutureofhd is offline
Blu-ray Baron
 
fighthefutureofhd's Avatar
 
Jun 2008
Dry County
Default

it's business plain and simple. don't think that any one of you wouldn't do the same. they stand to loose a lot of money here. i may not necessarily agree with their stance or tactics, but i understand why they're doing it and begrudge them of it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 08:39 PM   #17
EricJ EricJ is offline
Banned
 
Jul 2007
The Paradise of New England
6
Default

There is, however, a lot of truth in "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em"...

And Toshiba?...YOU CAN'T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 09:45 PM   #18
Uxi Uxi is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Uxi's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Southern California
14
191
9
Default

Toshiba has the golden opportunity to make a good Blu-ray player and perhaps throw in HDDVD support, instead of sucking their thumb and giving the middle finger to the supporters of their dead format.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Entertainment > General Chat

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Why is UltimateDisney.com Anti-Blu-ray? Blu-ray Movies - North America Ernest Rister 66 02-04-2009 04:31 PM
New battle cry for anti Blu-ray propaganda Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology USF Bull 33 04-23-2008 09:22 AM
WB anti Blu-ray - TROY? Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology Patranus 43 09-21-2007 04:22 PM
Europe Probes Blu-ray For Anti-Trust Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology HDTV1080P 25 07-06-2007 06:37 AM
More anti-Sony and anti-BD crap from Rob Endele Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology dobyblue 6 12-16-2006 02:40 AM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:24 AM.