|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $27.57 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.13 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $30.50 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $26.96 |
![]() |
#4781 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
that, given the dual functionality of the Sony’s F55 4K cameras, which, for instance proves very helpful in the editorial process for The Blacklist as noted recently here that there was a dual workflow for that Muse concert, as noted - https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread...se#post8312149 Meaning the HD files (from the 4K camera) were used as the source for the subsequent Blu-ray release and the 4K files were used for the 4K theatrical presentations. I would assume if Ultraflix is promoting that show as native 4K content, then the streaming version arose from the 4K files originally used for the theatrical presentations. It might be interesting for those who have the Blu-ray of that Muse concert (which was shot in HD and finished in HD, according to my friend) to compare it to the streaming 4K version and see if ? NanoTech/Ultraflix gave the superior sourced content (4K content) the bitrate it deserved to outperform the HD Blu-ray version. Concerts can often demand higher bitrates (compared to movie content) in order to show the best PQ no matter which display device (LCD or OLED) you watch it on. Last edited by Penton-Man; 03-18-2015 at 06:58 PM. Reason: fixed links for clarity |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4782 | |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() Quote:
[Show spoiler]
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4783 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
![]() As to Arsenal 2nd leg match hope to watch the 2nd half tonight and thanks for the spoiler. ![]() Barca v. Man City, I don't know when I'll get to. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4784 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4786 |
Member
|
![]()
Some of the "gold" rated 4k older movies they have up are Rocky, Rain Man, Fargo, Robocop but at 9.99 per rental. They have a nice selection of cheaper titles and lots of under 10 minute freebies. Lots of documentary stuff, concerts (Jethro Tull, Aerosmith, The Who).
The app runs a speed test when you log in to see if you have the bandwidth requirements for 4k streaming if not it gives you a similar message to vudus proceed with 4k, proceed with HD, etc. My speed test was 30mbps and haven't had any buffering or stops. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4787 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
We have the 4K 70” P series Viz down in the place we keep in San Diego. Fine value given the cost
![]() ![]() I don’t own the Blu-ray disc of the concert – https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Muse-...Blu-ray/88995/ but maybe someday, in case no serious videophile does it first and we’re ever hit by a series on rainy days down in S.D. (which is rare), I’ll buy the dang thing and do a comparison picture analysis of both deliverables (streaming vs. Blu-ray). On a cutting edge note of what’s been happening since that concert and what’s WAAAAY under the consumer radar, is that a concert during a rock festival in France last fall was mastered in HDR and was presented this winter for analysis by professionals (some of whom are involved in the standards process) to see how HDR would meet the challenge (vs SDR) of capturing and displaying intense lighting variation…. ![]() I heard it did well. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4789 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4791 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4792 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4793 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() Note: I’ve taken the liberty to bold phrases below which I feel pertinent to discussions we’ve had over the years here in this thread regarding the parameters of next gen video (UHD). "Hi guys, ….I was impressed - and I'm rarely am ... not by any of the big names out there coming out with new bigger sensored cameras or introducing new anamorphic lenses, maybe a little by the Varicam 35... impressed by one device or let's say game changer in viewing experience: HDR Demonstration at the Sony booth. I personally find that HDR is a wrong labelling here because first HDR is associated, at least for me, with HDR photography which is in most cases awful, surreal looking images (of course there are some very artistic, skilful and aesthetic HDR photos out there as well) and second because it's not really HDR, but just +/- 14 stops of dynamic range that the cameras can record in RAW nowadays that are put onto display. So to keep that short: I was amazed by the highlights that didn't just roll of smoothly or were still visible, but they are just FULLY there in all it's colourfulness - no blown out parts (besides some streetlights). For me, this is a whole new experience of watching film because it still looks very natural. The guys at Sony told me that this is all still in very early stages and unfortunately the shots were mainly night time Las Vegas (?) images, however if this eventually hits the market it will be a day in paradise for us cinematographers I believe ![]() cinemas will jump on this train first, so that they are a step ahead of home TVs to have this superior image, but if it hits the home/consumer market before the cinemas have enough lead time I don't know what will happen to the cinema market ... besides the huge screen and the often called »cinema experience« it will be surpassed by a superior image by home TVs ... let's see. So, some specs: the screen that Sony has it's a 1000nits screen. Hearing the panel of Dolby (unfortunately only the second half since I was so stunned by the Sony demo that I kept rewatching it numerous times and missed the first part) they are aiming for 10.000nits. And Dolby itself showed a comparison between an ordinary/standard TV and their 4000nits monitor. Was pretty impressive although some clouds were still blown out…." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4794 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Originally, in the more scientific literature as opposed to marketing interviews or sales pitches, SDR (standard dynamic range, or what we have now in our mastering and end user pipelines), was actually acronym labeled by engineers as LDR….standing for low dynamic range. For example, see: https://www.cs.ubc.ca/~heidrich/Papers/APGV.09_2.pdf http://www.banterle.com/francesco/pu...EGstar2009.pdf The switch in terminology from ‘LDR’ to thee now more popular ‘SDR’ was probably made out of kindness to the sensibilities of legacy dynamic range viewers/users so as to not highlight its deficiency. Both acronyms signify the same thing, namely, hamstrung display dynamic range as compared to the inherent capability our human visual system, or, in terms of acquisition, even modern day digital camera RAW images. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4795 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4796 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
4K sequences acquired with a high-end Phantom camera - http://www.visionresearch.com/Produc...hantom-Flex4K/ ) which were HDR-graded on a SIM2….http://www.sim2-professional.com/en/HDR_tech ….SIM2 multimedia being headquartered in Italy
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4800 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
it's at least worth watching a bit of it, fastforwarding to a couple different points. By the look of it i'm pretty sure it was shot digitally, so it's a good representation of what more early 4K releases could look like.
Marco Polo also looks amazing, but I've already watched every episode. I didn't think the older movies on Netflix were particularly impressive. The new Netflix series Bloodlines is also available in 4K as of a couple days ago. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|