The Criterion Collection

[DukeTogo84]

Originally Posted by dex14

They're getting released soon in Australia by Chameleon.

Yeah, I plan on getting it, simply to replace the horrible Tartan release. Still would prefer a US release and a Criterion one would be very exciting.

[Sommerswerd]

Originally Posted by DukeTogo84

Yeah, I plan on getting it, simply to replace the horrible Tartan release. Still would prefer a US release and a Criterion one would be very exciting.

I am surprised you aren't a subscriber to the Criterion Channel. There are a lot of Japanese films on there that haven't gotten a physical media release yet.

[DukeTogo84]

Originally Posted by Sommerswerd

I am surprised you aren't a subscriber to the Criterion Channel. There are a lot of Japanese films on there that haven't gotten a physical media release yet.

I've seen almost all of them already. When Criterion was on Hulu I had a month trial and watched everything they had that I hadn't already seen. They haven't added much since that's new to me.

[Mike0284]

Originally Posted by RCRochester

Well I did warn him. He seemed way too outspoken for a newbie. It might not be permanent though unless it actually was a sock.

Originally Posted by DukeTogo84

Yeah, seemed very knowledgable about the site and the reviews here, so it seemed like it was someone who either was already banned, or created the account to say things that they wouldn't say on their main account.

I've also noticed another new account that sounds a lot like someone else who was permanent banned awhile ago...

I mean you can access the site & forums without an account.

I was browsing around here for about 6 months before I made an account.

Originally Posted by Gacivory

I feel like I’m getting paranoid in my old age and just seeing sock accounts everywhere.

[koberulz]

Originally Posted by M A

What I do is import it into Audacity, use the speed change function, export it, then use MKVToolNix or TSMuxer to add it to the file.

I just pulled both into Premiere, synced up the video via a frame at the start and a frame at the end, exported the resulting BFI audio.

[HipsterTrash]

Originally Posted by dvining

That would never happen. Also, WB is the worst thing on earth for removing content from their streaming app.

[CelestialAgent]

Originally Posted by TheArgentinian

My issue with Criterion is less about the content of what they release and more about the availability of what they release.

The way I see it, all these Netflix, Amazon, Neon, A24 releases take up resources and a monthly slot that could be reserved for something that you can't already stream or buy in 4k. Does a new interview or essay really make a difference?

The counterpoint is that many of the titles Criterion are releasing can already be streamed on Criterion Channel, or are a reissue of something another label like Twilight Time released.

Also I’m doubtful to how streaming 4K compares to physical 4K.

[Blu-ray monster]

Originally Posted by SilverScreen96

Sorry, I came off the "Criterion releases with DNR" thread and I just can't stand the idea that so many stunning releases I have by them would supposedly use DNR and look "wrong" instead of beautiful.

As a note from the creator of that thread. All of the films in the “very light” section are mostly there for completion, a lot of the films in that section are the best they have ever looked due to previous releases either being telecined or using even more dnr/EE.

The releases in the very light section have more detail than other releases but just have a bit of dnr. Also I never said they look “wrong”, they just could look better. Stuff like M does look beautiful but also has a SLIGHT bit of dnr as confirmed by criterion.

[The_Iceflash]

Originally Posted by TheArgentinian

My issue with Criterion is less about the content of what they release and more about the availability of what they release.

The way I see it, all these Netflix, Amazon, Neon, A24 releases take up resources and a monthly slot that could be reserved for something that you can't already stream or buy in 4k. Does a new interview or essay really make a difference?

You’re exactly right. What is exactly the point and benefit of a Criterion release of something that can already be streamed or bought in 4k. They seem to be neglecting the preservation aspect of films are not readily available.

Originally Posted by CelestialAgent

The counterpoint is that many of the titles Criterion are releasing can already be streamed on Criterion Channel, or are a reissue of something another label like Twilight Time released.

Also I’m doubtful to how streaming 4K compares to physical 4K.

Even more of a reason why it’s a pointless endeavor that could be better spent on other releases.

[MifuneFan]

Imagine arguing at a site named Blu-ray.com that a physical media release is pointless because it's available to stream

[jedidarrick]

Originally Posted by MifuneFan

Imagine arguing at a site named Blu-ray.com that a physical media release is pointless because it's available to stream

Especially after the HBO Max debacle.
"It's available to stream!"
Will it be available to stream ten, five, hell, even one year from now?

[jw007]

I don't trust any streaming service any longer.

I'd rather spend $15-20 on a blu-ray than worry if a film I love will still be available to stream in the future.

[TolerancEJ]

Streaming is ok. However, if it's a film or program you really enjoy, make sure to own a physical copy. The streaming companies can add or remove programming whenever they wish.

[koberulz]

Streaming is the thing you use to watch films you're unfamiliar with to see if they're worth owning.

[drush9999]

Originally Posted by koberulz

Streaming is the thing you use to watch films you're unfamiliar with to see if they're worth owning.

Exactly, it's the equivalent of renting in the 80s and 90s

[Rayjg]

For me streaming is what it is replacing: normal television viewing. If I don’t want to completely commit to something, or if it’s late or I’m tired, I might start up a steaming pile of streaming. Otherwise, for serious viewing I pop in a disc. Streaming is fast food viewing just like television always has been.

[regeyer]

Originally Posted by koberulz

Streaming is the thing you use to watch films you're unfamiliar with to see if they're worth owning.

Bingo! Streaming is perfect in that regard. And relatively inexpensive.

[jw007]

Originally Posted by regeyer

Bingo! Streaming is perfect in that regard. And relatively inexpensive.

I have several streaming services (Hulu & Live TV - $85 a month, Apple TV+ - $7 a month, Netflix - $16 a month, HBO Max - $15 a month, and Amazon Prime - $9 a month), and it sure adds up!

[flyry]

would it be possible for them to ever release Nine Queens? It's on the channel and was on Filmstruck before.

the lack of latin american movies in the collection is pahetic. the NYT should write a profile on it...

[The_Iceflash]

Originally Posted by MifuneFan

Imagine arguing at a site named Blu-ray.com that a physical media release is pointless because it's available to stream

Ok, how about the Criterion 4K or non-4K releases that already have 4K or non-4K blu-ray releases and use the same transfer, and have almost identical bonus features or is missing some? About as pointless of a release as you can get.

Or like War or the Worlds which got a Criterion blu-ray in 2020 but 2 years later gets a 4K release making the Criterion release worthless. Criterion releases are supposed to be above the rest, not behind or redundant.