|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $82.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $22.95 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.99 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $41.99 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $19.96 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $101.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $7.00 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.89 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $70.00 |
![]() |
#22322 | |
Member
|
![]() Quote:
First of all, most of these films were shot on 16mm, which translates incredibly well to the blu-ray format because the resolution of the film source and the HD format are extremely close. You see natural film grain, and if you view a well transferred film sourced from a 16mm print on BRD projected on a large screen, your mind can truly be tricked into thinking it's film. I did this with Gimme Shelter recently and I dare say it looked better than the one theatrical presentation I saw years ago. Secondly, the quality of your viewing experience of the Brakhage films on home video will be directly related to the quality of the compression scheme used. This is always the case for home viewing, but for Brakhage's work it becomes even more important because in many of these films literally every frame has a radically different image. The changes in color and texture are abrupt and happen incredibly fast. You just don't get the same effect on a DVD, with the narrower data stream. If you can, I encourage you to look at the Brakhage material on DVD and BRD side by side both in motion and frame by frame. The difference is not subtle. Last edited by tyrone_slothrop; 12-15-2010 at 05:00 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22323 |
Special Member
|
![]()
I think the difference - at the risk of being hippie - is heart.
There are two real reasons to make movies, a strong need to tell a story and a vehicle to make cash. A film can be both. Look at "Cronos". No doubt that was a labor of love. Look at "Dukes of Hazzard: The Beginning". Clearly a product churned out for cash. Did "Dark Knight" make bank? Did "Star Trek" '09? Did "Lord of the Rings"? Of course they did, but there was also a desire from the filmmakers to really make something wonderful. Nolan, Abrams and Jackson cared about Batman Kirk and Frodo. Whenever I see an interview with Bay he talks about how amazing the special effects are - and to a degree I'll admit he probably enjoys making those effects - but he doesn't care about making a great story. I remember when Bay was only slightly terrible a few years ago. This was during the very early development of Tranformers. He talked for 10 minutes about the movie and never once mentioned anything about Transformers, only spectacle. To put it another way. Some filmmakers make films for themselves because they want those tales to exist. Oh sure, they hope the audience enjoys them and they hope some money is made to finance future projects, but they don't pander to the audiences demands. Other filmmakers give the audience whatever they want in search of the box office. That's the difference. So I have no beef with popcorn films or big budget films. I think we Criterion fans sometimes dismiss them outright. I object to film without passion. |
![]() |
![]() |
#22324 |
Blu-ray Ninja
Sep 2009
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22325 |
Special Member
|
![]()
For those who are bored. The next film announced will have the URL
http://www.criterion.com/films/27544-name-of-film So feel free to type in your guesses. |
![]() |
![]() |
#22326 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22327 | |
Member
|
![]() Quote:
I think I was the only person in the world who liked The Island. Exaggeration. I don't really like the rest of those movies though. Coincidentally, I'm reading a similarly themed book right now. (Probably not too hard to guess, but I'm going to leave the title out because that might be a spoiler.) Why did we stop playing the least favorite Criterion blu? I've only seen about 10, but I'm going with Man Who Fell to Earth. Although I watched more special features on that than any other movie. I like all the movies so far for what they are. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22329 |
Active Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22330 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
Sep 2009
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22332 |
Blu-ray Ninja
Sep 2009
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22333 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22335 | |
Expert Member
|
![]() Quote:
LOTR is not a popcorn flick in my opinion. It's too grand in scale, so many characters, places etc.. Same with the Harry Potter films. I see your point that Bay makes movies to make money and I agree. My only point is that he is good at doing exactly that. Herzog- never tried the north location. I live south and the guy that manages the SUnset Valley location is a pretty nice guy and will let you use them more then once. You should hit them up in July, just after I get my shopping out of the way! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22338 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22340 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
The Brown Bunny - 5/10 stars (6,998 votes)
"Professional motorcycle racer Bud Clay heads from New Hampshire to California to race again. Along the way he meets various needy women who provide him with the cure to his own loneliness, but only a certain woman from his past will truly satisfy him." - imdb.com hmmm... needy women? cure to his own "loneliness"? truly satisfy him? Last edited by aggienader08; 12-15-2010 at 05:50 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Criterion Collection | Wish Lists | Chushajo | 26 | 08-14-2025 12:45 PM |
Criterion Collection? | Newbie Discussion | ChitoAD | 68 | 01-02-2019 10:14 PM |
Criterion Collection Question. . . | Blu-ray Movies - North America | billypoe | 31 | 01-18-2009 02:52 PM |
The Criterion Collection goes Blu! | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | bferr1 | 164 | 05-10-2008 02:59 PM |
|
|