|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $82.99 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $33.54 1 hr ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $124.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $39.02 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $35.99 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $33.49 | ![]() $33.49 |
![]() |
#161 |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]()
8K? Awesome. Upgrade your TV and all your titles...
But wait! By then 16K will be out and you don't want to be left behind. So get the 16K TV and upgrade all your titles. But wait! By then there will be 32K and you don't want to be left behind. So get the shiny 32K TV and upgrade... Oh, and then we can have Blu-ray, 4K, 8K, 16K, and 32K reviews for the exact same title on here. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Indy64 (01-31-2018) |
![]() |
#162 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
If folks really desire to see more detail with their imagery, give me 4K 120fps instead, science - https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread...t#post14544289
Not marketing. |
![]() |
![]() |
#163 | ||
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#164 | ||
Special Member
![]() Mar 2010
Portishead ♫
|
![]() Quote:
We're stuck with motion sickness @ 24fps, it blurs our vision in moving action, we need 60fps and 120fps. I bet Ang Lee must feel frustrated, I would. His effort is the best thing that happened @ some theaters and on 4K UHD Blu-ray in the last x years of cinema. I sure agree with you. I want it all, and I want it now. ...8K UHD HDR10+ Dolby Vision, 120fps or 240fps, and 3D on 4K with dts:X (Dolby Atmos). ____ Bonus (this is music humor only, life's short...): Last edited by LordoftheRings; 02-03-2018 at 07:10 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#165 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
Like I said, it was no surprise, but it's still an example of how the Japanese are moving things along. As for my second point, seeing as QL discs are as rare as unicorn poo right now then 100GB simply isn't going to be enough for 8K to break into the physical disc market, not that another 28GB would make a massive amount of difference anyways. Just putting an 8K piece of news into the 8K thread.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#166 |
Blu-ray Count
|
![]()
Bring back the 12" laserdisc! With all that surface area, it could hold oodles of data now. Those large shiny platters would would make 8K as popular as 8 track tapes.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#167 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.denofgeek.com/uk/dvd-blur...ectable-format |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#169 |
Blu-ray Count
|
![]()
And they are pretty heavy, too. The larger cover art was nice, though. I had about 1200 at one time.
A larger diameter disc may be necessary to hold more data unless they can keep layering the 5" discs like an infinite optical onion. |
![]() |
![]() |
#170 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
The "IOO" format, I like that. There are other formats and developments in the optical disc field that can hold hundreds of GB's like Optical Disc Archive but this is an EXTREMELY expensive system that's intended for long term storage and not day-to-day handling (as it is they come in caddies). But unless someone takes it upon themselves to design Blu-ray's mass-market successor - a risky proposition in the shrinking market for physical media - then 8K on pressed disc is a non-starter.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#171 |
Special Member
![]() Mar 2010
Portishead ♫
|
![]() Last edited by LordoftheRings; 01-31-2018 at 10:06 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#172 | |
Special Member
May 2017
Earth v1.1, awaiting v2.0
|
![]()
http://www.avsforum.com/8k-evolving-view/
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#173 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
8K TV is coming soon to a living room near you. Here's what you need to know about the next big leap in flat-panel display resolution. Yes the author was inclined to boast that the AI Upscaling” of the Q9S would be able to satisfy the lack of 8K content by its great upscaling ability. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#174 |
Senior Member
May 2017
1444 No steps, No door
|
![]()
Funny thing is that if that was possible to bring back LD. You could put the entire LotR on one side and The Hobbits on the other. That would be AWESOME but just imagine what a glossy boxset would look like that BIG
![]() It would be worth every penny. ![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Vilya (02-02-2018) |
![]() |
#175 |
Active Member
|
![]()
I'd much rather we stuck at 4k for 5-10 years let it mature and move everything over. Provide far higher bitrate and less compressed content. 8k is unnecessary in most cases and more or less just a marketing ploy by manufacturers to sell something new.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#176 | |
Active Member
Sep 2015
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#179 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
Then we'll be talking about 8k but I'm sceptical about a physical version but then I was about 4k as well so the lesson I've learnt is that whatever you think is going to happen, probably won't. I never thought I'd be able to buy some new albums on cassette tape (the worst of all formats!) in 2018, that's for sure. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | mrtickleuk (02-03-2018) |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|